Article content
NOT FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OR FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. WIRE SERVICES
Written by Business Wire on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
The content in this section is supplied by Business Wire for the purposes of distributing press releases on behalf of its clients. Postmedia has not reviewed the content.
Author of the article:
Business Wire
Published Feb 14, 2025 • 5 minute read
NOT FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OR FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. WIRE SERVICES
Article content
Article content
TORONTO — dynaCERT Inc. (TSX: DYA) (OTC: DYFSF) (FRA: DMJ) (“dynaCERT” or the “Company“) is pleased to announce a non-brokered private placement offering of up to 33,333,334 units at a price of $0.15 per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of up to $5,000,000 (the “Offering”). Each unit (each, a “Unit”) will be comprised of one (1) common share of the Company (a “Common Share”) and one (1) common share purchase warrant (a “Warrant”). Each Warrant is exercisable into one (1) Common Share at an exercise price of $0.20 per Warrant for a period of thirty-six (36) months. All dollar values are in Canadian dollars.
Advertisement 2
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
or
Article content
The Units to be issued under the Offering will be offered to purchasers pursuant to the listed issuer financing exemption (“LIFE”) under Part 5A of National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus Exemptions in the provinces of Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta, and in certain other jurisdictions pursuant to applicable securities laws. The Units will not be subject to resale restrictions pursuant to applicable Canadian securities laws. dynaCERT has prepared and filed an offering document (the “Offering Document”) relating to the Offering that can be accessed under the Company’s profile at www.sedarplus.com, as well as on the Company’s website at www.dynacert.com. Prospective investors should read the Offering Document before making an investment decision.
Closing of the Offering is subject to certain conditions, including, but not limited to, the receipt of all necessary approvals, including but not limited to, the approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”).
As described in greater detail in the Offering Document, the proceeds of the Offering will be used to finance sales of the Company’s HydraGEN™ Technology Products to participants in the mining, oil & gas, transportation and generator sectors on a global basis and for working capital and for general corporate purposes.
The securities described herein have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) or any state securities laws, and accordingly, may not be offered or sold within the United States except in compliance with the registration requirements of the 1933 Act and applicable state securities requirements or pursuant to exemptions therefrom. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities in any jurisdiction.
About dynaCERT Inc.
dynaCERT Inc. manufactures and distributes Carbon Emission Reduction Technology along with its proprietary HydraLytica™ Telematics, a means of monitoring fuel consumption and calculating GHG emissions savings designed for the tracking of possible future Carbon Credits for use with internal combustion engines. As part of the growing global hydrogen economy, our patented technology creates hydrogen and oxygen on-demand through a unique electrolysis system and supplies these gases through the air intake to enhance combustion, which has shown to lower carbon emissions and improve fuel efficiency. Our technology is designed for use with many types and sizes of diesel engines used in on-road vehicles, reefer trailers, off-road construction, power generation, mining and forestry equipment. Website: www.dynaCERT.com.
Top Stories
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
READER ADVISORY
This press release of dynaCERT Inc. contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements”. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause dynaCERT’s actual results, performance or achievements, or developments in the industry to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results may vary from the forward-looking information in this news release due to certain material risk factors. This news release is not intended for distribution to U.S. news services or for dissemination in the United States. Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance of achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.
Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: uncertainty as to whether our strategies and business plans will yield the expected benefits; availability and cost of capital; the ability to identify and develop and achieve commercial success for new products and technologies; the level of expenditures necessary to maintain and improve the quality of products and services; changes in technology and changes in laws and regulations; the uncertainty of the emerging hydrogen economy; including the hydrogen economy moving at a pace not anticipated; our ability to secure and maintain strategic relationships and distribution agreements; and the other risk factors disclosed under our profile on SEDAR at www.sedarplus.com. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.
Advertisement 4
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.
Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of the release.
On Behalf of the Board
Murray James Payne, CEO
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250214327884/en/
Contacts
Jim Payne, Chairman & CEO
dynaCERT Inc.
#101 – 501 Alliance Avenue
Toronto, Ontario M6N 2J1
+1 (416) 766-9691 x 2
jpayne@dynaCERT.com
Investor Relations
dynaCERT Inc.
Nancy Massicotte
+1 (416) 766-9691 x 1
nmassicotte@dynaCERT.com
Article content
Share this article in your social network
Featured Local Savings
Written by Business Wire on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
The content in this section is supplied by Business Wire for the purposes of distributing press releases on behalf of its clients. Postmedia has not reviewed the content.
Author of the article:
Business Wire
Published Feb 14, 2025 • 47 minute read
MEDELLIN, Colombia — Mineros S.A. (TSX:MSA, MINEROS:CB) (“Mineros” or the “Company”) today reported its financial and operating results for the three months and year ended December 31, 2024. All dollar amounts – other than per share amounts – are expressed in thousands of US dollars unless otherwise stated. For further information, please see the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis posted on Mineros’ website https://mineros.com.co/en/investors/financial-reports and filed under its profile on www.sedarplus.com.
Advertisement 2
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
or
Article content
Article content
Article content
Andrés Restrepo, President and Chief Executive Officer of Mineros, commented: “We are very pleased with our results for the fourth quarter and year-ended December 31, 2024. From a financial perspective, high and rising gold prices provided us with record revenues and record profits for 2024 of $538.6M and $86.6M from the production and sale of 213,245 ounces of gold at an average price $2,387. Net earnings per share were $0.29. From an operational perspective our Hemco operation is running smoothly and our partnership with artisanal miners under the Bonanza model continues to deliver excellent results aligned with our vision of bringing benefit to all stakeholders thereby allowing us to produce close to the top end of our guidance. Our Nechí Alluvial operation met revised guidance for annual production. We continue to implement various efficiency measures to improve production. We are proud of the work we do in the El Bagre area and continue to effect positive change in the lives of locals through participation in formalizing some informal miners working alongside us. Cash Cost and all-in sustaining costs were in line for Nechí and just above the higher end of guidance for Hemco because of the very strong gold price.”
HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2024
For the three months ended December 31, 2024:
For the year ended December 31, 2024:
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
2024 Performance and 2025 Guidance
The Company achieved its revised production guidance for 2024 with the production of 213,245 ounces of gold, above the midpoint of the guided range. The Company had adjusted guidance in the third quarter of 2024 to better give stakeholders an idea of how the Nechí Alluvial Property and the Hemco Property were each performing against guidance, and to provide better information as to where Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and AISC per ounce of gold sold were trending. For 2025, we expect gold production to be between 201,000 and 223,000 ounces, building on the consistent performance of our Nicaragua underground mines and partnerships with artisanal miners and the diligence with which our teams at the Nechí Alluvial Property resolve issues as they arise. We remain focused on operational excellence and delivering strong, reliable returns for our shareholders.
The following table summarizes the Company’s production performance relative to 2024 guidance, and 2025 guidance:
Production Gold 2024 1 |
2024 Guidance1 2 |
2025 Guidance1 |
|
Nechí Alluvial Property |
82,017 |
77,000 – 85,000 |
81,000 – 91,000 |
Hemco Property |
34,344 |
33,000 – 35,000 |
33,000 – 36,000 |
Company Mines |
116,361 |
110,000 – 120,000 |
114,000 – 127,000 |
Artisanal – Nicaragua |
96,884 |
93,000 – 98,000 |
87,000 – 96,000 |
Consolidated |
213,245 |
203,000 – 218,000 |
201,000 – 223,000 |
The following table summarizes the Company’s cash cost and AISC performance relative to 2024 guidance, and 2025 guidance:
Cash Cost per ounce of |
2024 Performance ($/oz) |
2024 Guidance ($/oz 1 |
2025 Guidance ($/oz)1 2 3 |
Nechí Alluvial Property |
1,113 |
1,250 – 1,350 |
1,220 – 1,320 |
Hemco Property |
1,402 |
1,340 – 1,420 |
1,420 – 1,520 |
Consolidated |
1,282 |
1,250 – 1,330 |
1,340 – 1,430 |
AISC per ounce of gold |
|||
Nechí Alluvial Property |
1,345 |
1,450 – 1,550 |
1,440 – 1,540 |
Hemco Property |
1,585 |
1,500 – 1,580 |
1,680 – 1,780 |
Consolidated |
1,551 |
1,480 – 1,570 |
1,650 – 1,750 |
Top Stories
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 4
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Further to the Company’s January 25, 2025 news release, the composition of Cash Cost for the Nechi Alluvial Property (Colombia) segment was revised in the fourth quarter of 2024 to exclude an intercompany royalty between the Company and its subsidiary, Mineros Aluvial S.A.S. BIC, aligning the composition of those measures for reporting historical performance with the composition of those measures used in disclosing the Company’s guidance. This reduces Cash Cost and Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold for that segment. The Company notes that guidance provided for the Nechi Alluvial Property (Colombia) segment has always excluded the intercompany royalty, even though disclosure of historical Cash Cost performance for the segment did not, which resulted in an inconsistency in reporting of this measure between guidance and historical measures, which has now been addressed. The Company clarifies that all guidance and all historical calculations of Cash Cost and AISC on a consolidated basis previously disclosed by the Company have excluded the effect of this intercompany royalty, and accordingly, they have not been affected by this change.
Annual gold production for 2025 at the Nechí Alluvial Property is expected to be between 81,000 and 91,000 ounces. At the Nechí Alluvial Property, the Company anticipates Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and AISC per ounce of gold sold to increase slightly compared with 2024 due to inflationary pressures.
Advertisement 5
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
At the Hemco Property, the Company anticipates annual production in 2025 of 120,000 to 132,000 ounces of gold, including 87,000 to 96,000 ounces of gold from artisanal production. We have cultivated strong relationships with the artisanal mining community, creating a strategic advantage in sourcing gold. This collaborative approach ensures consistent access to high-quality minerals, allowing us to maintain stable production levels and deliver on our guidance commitments with greater confidence. The Company anticipates both Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and AISC per ounce of gold sold to increase due to higher assumed gold prices resulting in 2025, which would increase the cost of artisanal production.
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND YEAR-ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2024
The following table summarizes quarterly financial highlights for the three months and year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Three Months Ended |
Change |
Year ended |
Change |
|||||||||||||
2024 |
2023 |
2024 |
2023 |
|||||||||||||
($) |
($)2 |
($) |
% |
($) |
($)2 |
($) |
% |
|||||||||
Revenue |
150,158 |
130,427 |
19,731 |
15 |
538,566 |
447,290 |
91,276 |
20 |
||||||||
Cost of sales |
(95,664) |
(82,663) |
(13,001) |
16 |
(354,567) |
(301,888) |
52,679 |
17 |
||||||||
Gross Profit |
54,494 |
47,764 |
6,730 |
14 |
183,999 |
145,402 |
38,597 |
27 |
||||||||
Profit for the period from continuing operations |
23,195 |
22,808 |
387 |
2 |
86,552 |
74,538 |
12,014 |
16 |
||||||||
Loss for the period from discontinued operations |
— |
(1,043) |
1,043 |
(100) |
— |
(57,324) |
57,324 |
(100) |
||||||||
Net Profit for the period |
23,195 |
21,765 |
1,430 |
7 |
86,552 |
17,214 |
69,338 |
403 |
||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations ($/share) |
0.08 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
2 |
0.29 |
0.25 |
0.04 |
16 |
||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing and discontinued operations ($/share) |
0.08 |
0.07 |
— |
7 |
0.29 |
0.06 |
0.23 |
403 |
||||||||
Average realized price per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) 1 |
2,662 |
1,975 |
687 |
35 |
2,387 |
1,937 |
449 |
23 |
||||||||
Average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz)1 |
2,662 |
1,975 |
687 |
35 |
2,387 |
1,937 |
449 |
23 |
||||||||
Average realized price per ounce of gold sold from discontinued operations ($/oz) 1 |
— |
— |
— |
0 |
— |
1,938 |
(1,938) |
(100) |
||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA1 |
56,895 |
53,364 |
3,531 |
7 |
210,099 |
172,146 |
37,953 |
22 |
||||||||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz) 1 |
1,408 |
1,018 |
390 |
38 |
1,282 |
1,066 |
216 |
20 |
||||||||
AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz) 1 |
1,775 |
1,316 |
458 |
35 |
1,551 |
1,299 |
253 |
19 |
||||||||
Net cash flows generated by operating activities |
73,221 |
52,932 |
20,289 |
38 |
144,192 |
89,908 |
54,284 |
60 |
||||||||
Net free cash flow1 |
56,706 |
36,761 |
19,945 |
54 |
86,807 |
49,202 |
37,605 |
76 |
||||||||
ROCE1 |
37% |
30% |
6% |
21% |
37% |
30% |
6% |
21 % |
||||||||
Net Debt 1 |
(70,483) |
(24,316) |
(46,167) |
190 |
(70,483) |
(24,316) |
(46,167) |
190 |
||||||||
Dividends paid |
7,475 |
5,228 |
2,247 |
43 |
27,663 |
20,519 |
7,144 |
35 |
Advertisement 6
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Financial Highlights for the three months ended December 31, 2024
Advertisement 7
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Financial Highlights for year ended December 31, 2024
Advertisement 8
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Advertisement 9
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Operational Highlights by Material Property
The following table sets forth the gold produced for the continuing and discontinued operations of the Company for the three months and year ended December 31, with a discussion of the operational highlights for each of the three months ended December 31, 2024, following the table.
(All numbers in ounces unless otherwise noted)
Three Months |
Change |
Year ended |
Change |
||||||||||||||||
2024 |
2023 |
ounces |
% |
2024 |
2023 |
ounces |
% |
||||||||||||
Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) |
22,528 |
27,920 |
(5,392 |
) |
(19 |
) |
82,017 |
93,757 |
(11,740 |
) |
(13 |
) |
|||||||
Hemco Property |
8,797 |
9,480 |
(683 |
) |
(7 |
) |
34,344 |
32,732 |
1,612 |
5 |
|||||||||
Artisanal Mining |
22,864 |
24,639 |
(1,775 |
) |
(7 |
) |
96,884 |
93,219 |
3,665 |
4 |
|||||||||
Nicaragua |
31,661 |
34,119 |
(2,458 |
) |
(7 |
) |
131,228 |
125,951 |
5,277 |
4 |
|||||||||
Total Gold Produced from Continuing Operations |
54,189 |
62,039 |
(7,850 |
) |
(13 |
) |
213,245 |
219,708 |
(6,463 |
) |
(3 |
) |
|||||||
Gualcamayo Property (Argentina) |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
31,061 |
(31,061 |
) |
(100 |
) |
|||||||||
Total Gold Produced from Discontinued Operations |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
31,061 |
(31,061 |
) |
(100 |
) |
|||||||||
Total Gold Produced |
54,189 |
62,039 |
(7,850 |
) |
(13 |
) |
213,245 |
250,769 |
(37,524 |
) |
(15 |
) |
|||||||
Total Silver Produced |
112,142 |
198,427 |
(86,285 |
) |
(43 |
) |
765,611 |
623,976 |
141,635 |
23 |
Advertisement 10
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Operational Highlights for the three months ended December 31, 2024
The following table summarizes E&E expenditures for the three months and year ended December 31, 2024 and comparative periods.
Three Months Ended |
Change |
Year ended |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||
2024 |
2023 |
$ |
% |
2024 |
2023 |
$ |
% |
||||||||||||||||||
E&E expenditures capitalized 1, 2 |
$ |
1,705 |
$ |
3,812 |
$ |
(2,107 |
) |
(55 |
) |
$ |
4,711 |
$ |
6,779 |
$ |
(2,068 |
) |
(31 |
) |
|||||||
E&E expenditures expensed 3 |
2,072 |
2,556 |
(484 |
) |
(19 |
) |
6,354 |
6,092 |
262 |
4 |
|||||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
3,777 |
$ |
6,368 |
$ |
(2,591 |
) |
(41 |
) |
$ |
11,065 |
$ |
12,871 |
$ |
(1,806 |
) |
(14 |
) |
Health and Safety
Mineros reaffirms its commitment to provide and maintain a safe and healthy work environment in which all employees and contractors conduct themselves in a responsible and safe manner. Thus, the Company is committed to achieving a high standard of Occupational Health and Safety through the implementation of all policies, procedures, and standards and the continuous improvement of management systems, setting targets and monitoring performance. Operations at both of the Company’s Material Properties are ISO 45001 (Occupational Health and Safety Management) certified.
Advertisement 11
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The following table presents the safety statistics for the Year ended December 31, 2024, and the comparative period in 2023.
Health and Safety KPIs |
Year ended December 31, |
||
2024 |
2023 |
||
Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) |
LTIFR1 |
0.45 |
0.66 |
TRIFR 2 |
1.59 |
2.64 |
|
Hemco Property (Nicaragua) |
LTIFR |
0.03 |
0.34 |
TRIFR |
0.79 |
1.31 |
|
Mineros (Weighted Average) |
LTIFR |
0.21 |
0.49 |
TRIFR |
1.12 |
1.94 |
GROWTH AND EXPLORATION PROJECT UPDATES
Near Mine Exploration, Hemco Property Expansion
Near mine exploration is focused on the current mining operations, the Panama Mine and the Pioneer Mine. Mineralization is related to an epithermal gold system associated with multiple quartz veins.
A diamond drill program totaling 134 holes and 37,860 metres was completed in 2024. The objective of this campaign was to increase the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves at the Panama Mine and the Pioneer Mine. In the fourth quarter of 2024, the drill program advanced at the Panama Mine and the Pioneer Mine, with 7,829 metres of drilling completed in 29 holes. A total of 4,004 metres were drilled at the Panama Mine and 3,825 metres at the Pioneer Mine. The Company faced delays in its drilling program due to mechanical issues with the drilling rigs.
For 2025, the Company has planned a diamond drilling campaign of approximately 30,000 metres to expand the current Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. A total of 17,500 metres is planned for the Panama Mine and 12,500 metres for the Pioneer Mine.
Brownfield Exploration, Hemco Property Expansion
Brownfield exploration is centered on the Bonanza block, which encompasses the concession areas between the Panama Mine and the Pioneer Mine. The mineralization belongs to the same epithermal gold trend that comprises the Panama and Pioneer mines, characterized by multiple quartz veins.
For 2025, Mineros has planned an 18,000 metre diamond drilling campaign to mainly evaluate two brownfield targets, Cleopatra and Orpheus. The objective of this drilling campaign aligns with the Company’s strategic plan to ensure the mineral resources being mined at the Panama and Pioneer mines are replaced.
Advertisement 12
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Porvenir Project
The Porvenir Project is a pre-development stage project located 10.5 km southwest of the existing Hemco Property facilities. Mineralization consists of a volcanic hosted gold-zinc-silver deposit with epithermal quartz veins of intermediate sulphidation.
In 2024, Mineros completed work to evaluate alternative mining methods for the Porvenir Project to improve extraction efficiency and reduce costs, including through the analysis of alternative geometallurgical assumptions and analysis of metallurgical test work results, which allowed for the refinement of the geometallurgical model for the Porvenir Project, completed in fourth quarter of 2024. This work was guided by the findings of the geomechanical study which was also completed in 2024.
The Company is updating the Mineral Resources and Reserves for the Porvenir Project to maximize its value, with the prefeasibility study optimization scheduled for completion in 2025.
Guillermina Target
The Guillermina target is an epithermal zinc-gold-silver deposit, located four kilometers west of the Pioneer deposit.
A total of 40 holes comprising 6,498 metres of diamond drilling was completed in 2024, achieving 100% of the original plan.
For 2025, Mineros has planned a 2,000-meter diamond drilling campaign to collect material for metallurgical testing and to conduct infill drilling on current inferred resources, with the aim of upgrading them to the category of Indicated Mineral Resource as such term is defined under NI 43-101.
Leticia Deposit
The Leticia Deposit is an epithermal gold-silver-zinc deposit, located 500 m northwest of the Porvenir Project.
For 2025, Mineros has planned a 1,300-meter diamond drilling campaign focused on infill drilling of current Inferred Mineral Resources, with the goal of upgrading them to the Indicated Mineral Resource category.
Luna Roja Deposit
The Luna Roja Deposit is a skarn gold system, located 24 km southeast from the existing Hemco facilities. The Company is focusing on expanding the current Mineral Resources and identifying new targets surrounding the main deposit.
In the fourth quarter of 2024, internal metallurgical testing at the Hemco Lab, along with all technical work and analysis for updating the Mineral Resource estimate for the Luna Roja Deposit, was completed. The updated estimate has been reviewed by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd., with publication planned for 2025.
Advertisement 13
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The Company carried out fieldwork targeting geophysical anomalies in the fourth quarter of 2024. Due to the limited presence of outcrops in the area, additional geophysical analysis and drilling are required to support further investigations.
No drilling activities are scheduled for the Luna Roja Deposit in 2025.
Hemco Property Regional Exploration
Mineros’ regional greenfield exploration is focused on two areas with early-stage targets: Rosita and Bonanza districts. The Bonanza district excludes the designated brownfield area known as the Bonanza block, see Brownfield Exploration, Hemco Property Expansion.
A total of 10 holes comprising 1,374 metres of diamond drilling was completed in the fourth quarter of 2024, achieving approximately 92% of the original plan at the Okonwas Target, part of the Rosita I concession. Assay results are expected to be received in the first quarter of 2025, however, preliminary observations indicate multiple semi-parallel thin veins containing chalcopyrite, sphalerite and galena, suggesting a gold-zinc-silver mineralization.
For 2025, Mineros adjusted its regional drilling strategy to align with the Company’s strategic plan, which prioritizes replacing Mineral Resources at the Panama and Pioneer Mines. For greenfield exploration, efforts will be concentrated on two key areas:
A 14,500-meter drilling campaign is planned for 2025, with approximately 6,000 meters allocated for exploration in the Rosita District and 8,500 meters in the Bonanza District.
Near Mine Exploration, Nechí Alluvial Property Expansion
At the Nechí Alluvial Property, Mineros is exploring for alluvial gold predominantly east of the Nechí River, where the Company is currently mining within quaternary alluvial sediments.
Advertisement 14
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
A total of 14,910 metres in 531 holes were completed in 2024, approximately 50% higher than the Company’s original drilling plan. A total of 3,132 metres in 101 holes were drilled in the fourth quarter of 2024, with 390 metres focused on Mineral Resource expansion and 2,742 metres of infill drilling in the current production area. From the total, 892 metres in 31 holes of ward drilling and 2,240 metres in 70 holes of sonic drilling were completed.
In 2024, Mineros increased infill drilling to improve Mineral Resource estimates and reduce geological uncertainty in the current production zone.
In early 2024, Mineros carried out reconnaissance drilling at the Río Cauca target as part of its regional exploration strategy. Using sonic drilling, 681 m were completed across two concessions (503244 and 503248) to evaluate the potential of quaternary sedimentary units, including terraces and alluvial plains, for hosting economically viable gold deposits.
A 10,000 metre-drilling campaign is planned for 2025, where approximately 4,750 metres are designed to expand the current Mineral Resources, 5,000 metres of infill drilling in the production areas and 250 metres of continuing reconnaissance drilling at the Río Cauca Target. From the total, 3,300 metres of ward drilling and 6,700 metres of sonic drilling are planned.
CONFERENCE CALL AND WEBCAST DETAILS
As a reminder the Company will host a conference call Tuesday, February 18, 2025, at 9:00 am EST (9:00 AM Colombian Standard Time) to discuss the results. The conference call will be in Spanish with simultaneous translation in English.
Please join us here.
The live webcast requires previous registration, and interested parties are advised to access the webcast approximately ten minutes prior to the start of the call. The webcast will be archived on the Company’s website at www.mineros.com.co for approximately 30 days following the call.
ABOUT MINEROS S.A.
Mineros is a gold mining company headquartered in Medellin, Colombia. The Company has a diversified asset base, with relatively low cost mines in Colombia and Nicaragua and a pipeline of development and exploration projects throughout the region.
The board of directors and management of Mineros have extensive experience in mining, corporate development, finance and sustainability. Mineros has a long track record of maximizing shareholder value and delivering solid annual dividends. For almost 50 years Mineros has operated with a focus on safety and sustainability at all its operations.
Advertisement 15
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Mineros’ common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “MSA”, and on the Colombia Stock Exchange under the symbol “MINEROS”.
QUALIFIED PERSON
The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Luis Fernando Ferreira de Oliveira, MAusIMM CP (Geo), Mineral Resources and Reserves Manager for Mineros S.A., who is a qualified person within the meaning of NI 43-101.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release contains “forward looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward looking information includes statements that use forward looking terminology such as “may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, “should”, “intend”, “target”, “plan”, “expect”, “budget”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “schedule”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “continue”, “potential”, “view” or the negative or grammatical variation thereof or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. Such forward looking information includes, without limitation, statements with respect to the Company’s outlook for 2025; estimates for future mineral production and sales; the Company’s expectations, strategies and plans for the Material Properties; the Company’s planned exploration, development and production activities; statements regarding the projected exploration and development of the Company’s projects; adding or upgrading Mineral Resources and developing new mineral deposits; estimates of future capital and operating costs; the costs and timing of future exploration and development; estimates for future prices of gold and other minerals; expectations regarding the payment of dividends; and any other statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future plans, intentions, levels of activity, results, performance or achievements.
Forward-looking information is based upon estimates and assumptions of management in light of management’s experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, as well as other factors that management believes to be relevant and reasonable in the circumstances, as of the date of this news release including, without limitation, assumptions about: favourable equity and debt capital markets; the ability to raise any necessary additional capital on reasonable terms to advance the production, development and exploration of the Company’s properties and assets; future prices of gold and other metal prices; the timing and results of exploration and drilling programs, and technical and economic studies; the development of the Porvenir Project; completion of its drilling programs; the accuracy of any Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates; the geology of the Material Properties being as described in the applicable technical reports; production costs; the accuracy of budgeted exploration and development costs and expenditures; the price of other commodities such as fuel; future currency exchange rates and interest rates; operating conditions being favourable such that the Company is able to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; political and regulatory stability; the receipt of governmental, regulatory and third party approvals, licenses and permits on favourable terms; obtaining required renewals for existing approvals, licenses and permits on favourable terms; requirements under applicable laws; sustained labour stability; stability in financial and capital goods markets; inflation rates; availability of labour and equipment; positive relations with local groups, including artisanal mining cooperatives in Nicaragua, and the Company’s ability to meet its obligations under its agreements with such groups; and satisfying the terms and conditions of the Company’s current loan arrangements. While the Company considers these assumptions to be reasonable, the assumptions are inherently subject to significant business, social, economic, political, regulatory, competitive and other risks and uncertainties, contingencies and other factors that could cause actual actions, events, conditions, results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those projected in the forward-looking information. Many assumptions are based on factors and events that are not within the control of the Company and there is no assurance they will prove to be correct.
Advertisement 16
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
For further information of these and other risk factors, please see the ‘”Risk Factors” section of the Company’s annual information form dated March 25, 2024, available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.
The Company cautions that the foregoing lists of important assumptions and factors are not exhaustive. Other events or circumstances could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated or projected and expressed in, or implied by, the forward looking information contained herein. There can be no assurance that forward looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward looking information.
Forward looking information contained herein is made as of the date of this news release and the Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, except as and to the extent required by applicable securities laws.
NON-IFRS AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
The Company has included certain non-IFRS financial measures and non-IFRS ratios in this news release. Management believes that non-IFRS financial measures and non-IFRS ratios, when supplementing measures determined in accordance with IFRS, provide investors with an improved ability to evaluate the underlying performance of the Company. Non-IFRS financial measures and non-IFRS ratios do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures employed by other companies. This data is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. For a discussion of the use of non-IFRS financial measures and reconciliations thereof to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, see below.
EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, certain investors use earnings before interest and tax (“EBIT”), earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), and adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”), which excludes certain non-operating income and expenses, such as financial income or expenses, hedging operations, exploration expenses, impairment of assets, foreign currency exchange differences, and other expenses (principally, donations, corporate projects and taxes incurred). The Company believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results because it is consistent with the indicators management uses internally to measure the Company’s performance and is an indicator of the performance of the Company’s mining operations.
Advertisement 17
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The following table sets out the calculation of EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to Net profit for the three months and years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023:
Three Months Ended |
Year ended |
||||||||||||||
2024 |
2023 |
2024 |
2023 |
||||||||||||
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
||||||||||||
Net Profit For The Period |
$ |
23,195 |
$ |
21,765 |
$ |
86,552 |
$ |
17,214 |
|||||||
Less: Interest income |
(613 |
) |
(352 |
) |
(1,691 |
) |
(1,302 |
) |
|||||||
Add: Interest expense |
2,217 |
1,557 |
8,260 |
5,118 |
|||||||||||
Add: Current tax 1 |
15,598 |
12,472 |
53,123 |
42,561 |
|||||||||||
Add/less: Deferred tax 1 |
(699 |
) |
(3,376 |
) |
1,894 |
(14,520 |
) |
||||||||
EBIT |
$ |
39,698 |
$ |
32,066 |
$ |
148,138 |
$ |
49,071 |
|||||||
Add: Depreciation and amortization |
11,632 |
12,330 |
48,548 |
45,099 |
|||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ |
51,330 |
$ |
44,396 |
$ |
196,686 |
$ |
94,170 |
|||||||
Less: Other income |
(516 |
) |
(1,082 |
) |
(2,908 |
) |
(6,104 |
) |
|||||||
Add: Share of results of associates |
20 |
117 |
99 |
117 |
|||||||||||
Less: Finance income (excluding interest income) |
(24 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(107 |
) |
(107 |
) |
|||||||
Add: Finance expense (excluding interest expense) |
25 |
1,051 |
173 |
3,833 |
|||||||||||
Add: Other expenses |
4,831 |
4,152 |
10,802 |
10,053 |
|||||||||||
Add: Exploration expenses |
2,072 |
2,556 |
6,354 |
6,092 |
|||||||||||
Less: Foreign exchange differences |
(843 |
) |
1,139 |
(1,000 |
) |
6,768 |
|||||||||
Add: Loss for the period from discontinued operations 2 |
— |
1,043 |
— |
57,324 |
|||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA3 |
$ |
56,895 |
$ |
53,364 |
$ |
210,099 |
$ |
172,146 |
Cash Cost
The objective of Cash Cost is to provide stakeholders with a key indicator that reflects as close as possible the direct cost of producing and selling an ounce of gold.
The Company reports Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold which is calculated by deducting revenue from silver sales, depreciation and amortization, environmental rehabilitation provisions and including cash used for retirement obligations and environmental and rehabilitation and sales of electric energy. This total is divided by the number of gold ounces sold. Cash Cost includes mining, milling, mine site security, royalties, and mine site administration costs, and excludes non-cash operating expenses. Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold is a non-IFRS financial measure used to monitor the performance of our gold mining operations and their ability to generate profit, and is consistent with the guidance methodology set out by the World Gold Council.
Advertisement 18
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The following table provides a reconciliation of Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold on a by-product basis to cost of sales for the three months and years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023:
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2024 |
2023 |
2024 |
2023 |
|||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
$ |
95,664 |
$ |
82,663 |
$ |
354,567 |
$ |
301,888 |
||||||||
Less: Cost of sales of non-mining operations1 |
— |
(257 |
) |
(827 |
) |
(751 |
) |
|||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
(11,469 |
) |
(11,885 |
) |
(47,430 |
) |
(43,665 |
) |
||||||||
Less: Sales of silver |
(3,520 |
) |
(4,669 |
) |
(21,239 |
) |
(14,384 |
) |
||||||||
Less: Sales of electric energy |
(2,270 |
) |
(2,071 |
) |
(7,581 |
) |
(5,346 |
) |
||||||||
Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision |
(3,296 |
) |
(1,846 |
) |
(7,360 |
) |
(4,788 |
) |
||||||||
Add: Use of environmental and rehabilitation liabilities |
728 |
1,137 |
1,539 |
1,137 |
||||||||||||
Add: Use of Retirement obligations |
469 |
81 |
1,672 |
81 |
||||||||||||
Cash Cost from continuing operations |
$ |
76,306 |
$ |
63,153 |
$ |
273,341 |
$ |
234,172 |
||||||||
Gold sold (oz) from continuing operations |
54,189 |
62,039 |
213,245 |
219,708 |
||||||||||||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz) |
$ |
1,408 |
$ |
1,018 |
$ |
1,282 |
$ |
1,066 |
||||||||
Cash Cost from discontinued operations |
— |
— |
— |
66,262 |
||||||||||||
Gold sold (oz) from discontinued operations |
— |
— |
— |
31,737 |
||||||||||||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from discontinued operations ($/oz) |
$ |
— |
$ |
0 |
$ |
— |
$ |
2,088 |
||||||||
Cash Cost |
$ |
76,306 |
$ |
63,153 |
$ |
273,341 |
$ |
300,434 |
||||||||
Gold sold (oz) |
54,189 |
62,039 |
213,245 |
251,445 |
||||||||||||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
1,408 |
$ |
1,018 |
$ |
1,282 |
$ |
1,195 |
Changes in Composition of Cash Cost
The composition of Cash Cost from continuing operations was revised in the fourth quarter of 2023 to adjust for asset retirement obligations and environmental rehabilitation provisions in connection with the sale of the Gualcamayo Property. Values for prior periods have been adjusted from amounts previous disclosed to reflect these changes.
The composition of Cash Cost was revised in the second quarter of 2024 to deduct revenue from sales of electric energy from cost of sales to better reflect the costs to produce an ounce of gold. Values for prior periods have been adjusted from amounts previous disclosed to reflect these changes.
Changes in Composition of Cash Cost – Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) Segment
Advertisement 19
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The composition of Cash Cost for the Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) segment was revised in the fourth quarter of 2024 to exclude an intercompany royalty, which reduces Cash Cost and Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold for that segment. The Company notes that guidance provided for the Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) segment has always excluded the intercompany royalty, even though disclosure of historical Cash Cost performance for the segment did not, which resulted in an inconsistency in reporting of this measure between guidance and historical measures. Disclosure of Cash Cost and Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold for the Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) segment has been adjusted from amounts previously disclosed in historical MD&A to reflect this change. For greater certainty, this change does not affect Cash Cost and Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold of the Company on a consolidated basis, or for any other segment.
All-in Sustaining Costs
The objective of AISC is to provide stakeholders with a key indicator that reflects as close as possible the full cost of producing and selling an ounce of gold. AISC per ounce of gold sold is a non-IFRS ratio that is intended to provide investors with transparency regarding the total costs of producing one ounce of gold in the relevant period.
The Company reports AISC per ounce of gold sold on a by-product basis. The methodology for calculating AISC per ounce of gold sold is set out below and is consistent with the guidance methodology set out by the World Gold Council. The World Gold Council definition of AISC seeks to extend the definition of total Cash Cost by deducting cost of sales of non-mining operations and adding administrative expenses, sustaining exploration, sustaining leases and leaseback and sustaining capital expenditures. Non-sustaining costs are primarily those related to new operations and major projects at existing operations that are expected to materially benefit the current operation. The determination of classification of sustaining versus non-sustaining requires judgment by management. AISC excludes current and deferred income tax payments, finance expenses and other expenses. Consequently, these measures are not representative of all the Company’s cash expenditures. In addition, the calculation of AISC does not include depreciation and amortization cost or expense as it does not reflect the impact of expenditures incurred in prior periods. Therefore, it is not indicative of the Company’s overall profitability. Other companies may quantify these measures differently because of different underlying principles and policies applied. Differences may also occur due to different definitions of sustaining versus non-sustaining.
Advertisement 20
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The following table provides a reconciliation of AISC per ounce of gold sold to cost of sales for the three months and years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023:
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2024 |
2023 |
2024 |
2023 |
|||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
$ |
95,664 |
$ |
82,663 |
$ |
354,567 |
$ |
301,888 |
||||||||
Less: Cost of sales of non-mining operations 1 |
— |
(257 |
) |
(827 |
) |
(751 |
) |
|||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
(11,469 |
) |
(11,885 |
) |
(47,430 |
) |
(43,665 |
) |
||||||||
Less: Sales of silver |
(3,520 |
) |
(4,669 |
) |
(21,239 |
) |
(14,384 |
) |
||||||||
Less: Sales of electric energy |
(2,270 |
) |
(2,071 |
) |
(7,581 |
) |
(5,346 |
) |
||||||||
Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision |
(3,296 |
) |
(1,846 |
) |
(7,360 |
) |
(4,788 |
) |
||||||||
Add: Use of environmental and rehabilitation liabilities |
728 |
1,137 |
1,539 |
1,137 |
||||||||||||
Add: Use of Retirement obligations |
469 |
81 |
1,672 |
81 |
||||||||||||
Add: Administrative expenses |
9,231 |
6,730 |
22,448 |
18,355 |
||||||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization of administrative expenses 2 |
(163 |
) |
(445 |
) |
(1,118 |
) |
(1,434 |
) |
||||||||
Add: Sustaining leases and leaseback 3 |
2,455 |
2,070 |
9,838 |
7,995 |
||||||||||||
Add: Sustaining exploration 4 |
31 |
337 |
191 |
885 |
||||||||||||
Add: Sustaining capital expenditures 5 |
8,313 |
9,822 |
26,125 |
25,378 |
||||||||||||
AISC from continuing operations |
$ |
96,173 |
$ |
81,667 |
$ |
330,825 |
$ |
285,351 |
||||||||
Gold sold (oz) from continued operations |
54,189 |
62,039 |
213,245 |
219,708 |
||||||||||||
AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz) |
$ |
1,775 |
$ |
1,316 |
$ |
1,551 |
$ |
1,299 |
||||||||
AISC from discontinued operations |
— |
— |
— |
76,911 |
||||||||||||
Gold sold (oz) from discontinued operations |
— |
9,947 |
— |
31,737 |
||||||||||||
AISC per ounce of gold sold from discontinued operations ($/oz) |
— |
— |
— |
2,423 |
||||||||||||
AISC |
$ |
96,173 |
$ |
81,667 |
$ |
330,825 |
$ |
362,262 |
||||||||
Gold sold (oz) |
54,189 |
71,986 |
213,245 |
251,445 |
||||||||||||
AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
1,775 |
$ |
1,134 |
$ |
1,551 |
$ |
1,441 |
Advertisement 21
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Changes in Composition of AISC
The composition of AISC from continuing operations and AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations was revised in the fourth quarter of 2023 to adjust for asset retirement obligations and environmental rehabilitation provisions in connection with the sale of the Gualcamayo Property. Values for prior periods have been adjusted from amounts previous disclosed to reflect these changes.
Changes in Composition of AISC – Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) Segment
The composition of AISC for the Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) segment was revised in the fourth quarter of 2024 to exclude an intercompany royalty, which reduces AISC and AISC per ounce of gold sold for that segment. The Company notes that guidance provided for the Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) segment has always excluded the intercompany royalty, even though disclosure of historical AISC performance for the segment did not, which resulted in an inconsistency in reporting of this measure between guidance and historical measures. Disclosure of AISC and AISC per ounce of gold sold for the Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) segment has been adjusted from amounts previously disclosed in historical MD&A to reflect this change. For greater certainty, this change does not affect AISC and AISC per ounce of gold sold of the Company on a consolidated basis, or for any other segment.
Cash Cost and All-in Sustaining Costs by Operating Segment
The following tables provide a reconciliation of Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and AISC per ounce of gold sold by operating segment1 to cost of sales, for the three months and years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023:
Three months ended December 31, 2024
Nechi Alluvial |
Hemco |
||||||
Cost of sales |
$ |
39,055 |
$ |
61,032 |
|||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
(3,881 |
) |
(7,550 |
) |
|||
Less: Sales of silver |
(64 |
) |
(3,456 |
) |
|||
Less: Sales of electric energy |
(2,270 |
) |
— |
||||
Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision |
(3,296 |
) |
— |
||||
Add: Use of environmental and rehabilitation liabilities |
728 |
— |
|||||
Add: Use of Retirement obligations |
— |
469 |
|||||
Cash Cost |
$ |
26,048 |
$ |
50,495 |
|||
AISC Adjustments |
|||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization of administrative expenses |
(4 |
) |
(11 |
) |
|||
Add: Administrative expenses |
1,495 |
959 |
|||||
Add: Sustaining leases and Leaseback |
636 |
1,819 |
|||||
Add: Sustaining exploration |
31 |
— |
|||||
Add: Sustaining capital expenditure |
4,056 |
4,257 |
|||||
AISC |
$ |
32,262 |
$ |
57,519 |
|||
Gold sold (oz) |
22,528 |
31,661 |
|||||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
1,156 |
$ |
1,595 |
|||
AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
1,432 |
$ |
1,817 |
Advertisement 22
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Three months ended December 31, 2023
Nechi Alluvial |
Hemco |
||||||
Cost of sales |
$ |
33,969 |
$ |
52,822 |
|||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
(4,265 |
) |
(7,583 |
) |
|||
Less: Sales of silver |
(61 |
) |
(4,608 |
) |
|||
Less: Sales of electric energy |
(2,071 |
) |
– |
||||
Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision |
(1,846 |
) |
— |
||||
Cash Cost |
$ |
22,852 |
$ |
40,712 |
|||
AISC Adjustments |
|||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization administrative expenses |
(4 |
) |
(7 |
) |
|||
Add: Administrative expenses |
799 |
897 |
|||||
Add: Sustaining leases and Leaseback |
547 |
1,523 |
|||||
Add: Sustaining exploration |
337 |
— |
|||||
Add: Sustaining capital expenditure |
4,075 |
5,747 |
|||||
AISC |
$ |
28,606 |
$ |
48,872 |
|||
Gold sold (oz) |
27,920 |
34,119 |
|||||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
818 |
$ |
1,193 |
|||
AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
1,025 |
$ |
1,432 |
Year ended December 31, 2024
Nechi Alluvial |
Hemco |
||||||
Cost of sales |
$ |
135,587 |
$ |
233,923 |
|||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
(16,643 |
) |
(30,625 |
) |
|||
Less: Sales of silver |
(215 |
) |
(21,024 |
) |
|||
Less: Sales of electric energy |
(7,581 |
) |
— |
||||
Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision |
(7,360 |
) |
— |
||||
Add: Use of environmental and rehabilitation liabilities |
1,539 |
— |
|||||
Add: Use of Retirement obligations |
— |
1,672 |
|||||
Cash Cost |
$ |
91,262 |
$ |
183,946 |
|||
AISC Adjustments |
|||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization of administrative expenses |
(15 |
) |
(43 |
) |
|||
Add: Administrative expenses |
3,637 |
3,394 |
|||||
Add: Sustaining leases and Leaseback |
2,696 |
7,142 |
|||||
Add: Sustaining exploration |
191 |
— |
|||||
Add: Sustaining capital expenditure |
12,524 |
13,601 |
|||||
AISC |
$ |
110,295 |
$ |
208,040 |
|||
Gold sold (oz) |
82,017 |
131,228 |
|||||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
1,113 |
$ |
1,402 |
|||
AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
1,345 |
$ |
1,585 |
Three months ended December 31, 2023
Nechi Alluvial |
Hemco |
||||||
Cost of sales |
$ |
33,969 |
$ |
52,822 |
|||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
(4,265 |
) |
(7,583 |
) |
|||
Less: Sales of silver |
(61 |
) |
(4,608 |
) |
|||
Less: Sales of electric energy |
(2,071 |
) |
– |
||||
Less: Intercompany royalty |
(4,011 |
) |
— |
||||
Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision |
(1,846 |
) |
— |
||||
Add: Use of environmental and rehabilitation liabilities |
1,137 |
— |
|||||
Add: Use of Retirement obligations |
— |
81 |
|||||
Cash Cost |
$ |
22,852 |
$ |
40,712 |
|||
AISC Adjustments |
|||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization administrative expenses |
(4 |
) |
(7 |
) |
|||
Add: Administrative expenses |
799 |
897 |
|||||
Add: Sustaining leases and Leaseback |
547 |
1,523 |
|||||
Add: Sustaining exploration |
337 |
— |
|||||
Add: Sustaining capital expenditure |
4,075 |
5,747 |
|||||
AISC |
$ |
28,606 |
$ |
48,872 |
|||
Gold sold (oz) |
27,920 |
34,119 |
|||||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
818 |
$ |
1,193 |
|||
AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
1,025 |
$ |
1,432 |
Advertisement 23
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Reconciliation of Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and AISC per ounce of gold – Nechí Alluvial Segment (Colombia)
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the calculation of Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and the AISC per ounce of gold sold for the Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia) segment for the three months and year ended December 31, 2023, reflecting changes made to the composition of those measures in the 2024 financial year and to align with the manner in which guidance is reported.
Cash Cost Reconciliation
Three Months Ended |
Year ended |
||||||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) – Previously reported |
$ |
1,036 |
$ |
1,046 |
|||
Adjustments ($/oz) |
|||||||
Less: Intercompany royalty |
(144 |
) |
(142 |
) |
|||
Less: Sales of electric energy |
(74 |
) |
(57 |
) |
|||
Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) restated |
$ |
818 |
$ |
847 |
AISC Reconciliation
Three Months Ended |
Year ended |
||||||
AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) – Previously reported |
$ |
1,168 |
$ |
1,188 |
|||
Adjustments ($/oz) |
|||||||
Less: Intercompany royalty |
(144 |
) |
(142 |
) |
|||
AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) restated |
$ |
1,024 |
$ |
1,046 |
Net Free Cash Flow
The Company uses the financial measure “net free cash flow”, which is a non-IFRS financial measure, to supplement information regarding cash flows generated by operating activities. The Company believes that in addition to IFRS financial measures, certain investors and analysts use this information to evaluate the Company’s performance with respect to its operating cash flow capacity to meet recurring outflows of cash.
Net free cash flow is calculated as cash flows generated by operating activities less non-discretionary sustaining capital expenditures and interest and dividends paid related to the relevant period. As the Gualcamayo Property was sold in September 2023, amounts related to the metrics shown in the following table have been calculated to reflect only the continuing operations of the Company.
The following table sets out the calculation of the Company’s net free cash flow to net cash flows generated by operating activities for the three months and years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023:
Advertisement 24
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||
2024 |
2023 |
2024 |
2023 |
||||||||||||
Net cash flows generated by operating activities |
$ |
73,221 |
$ |
52,932 |
$ |
144,192 |
$ |
89,908 |
|||||||
Non-discretionary items: |
|||||||||||||||
Sustaining capital expenditures (excluding Gualcamayo) |
(8,313 |
) |
(9,822 |
) |
(26,125 |
) |
(25,378 |
) |
|||||||
Interest paid |
(727 |
) |
(1,121 |
) |
(3,597 |
) |
(7,572 |
) |
|||||||
Dividends paid |
(7,475 |
) |
(5,228 |
) |
(27,663 |
) |
(20,519 |
) |
|||||||
Net cash flows used in (generated from) discontinued operations 1 |
— |
— |
— |
12,763 |
|||||||||||
Net free cash flow |
$ |
56,706 |
$ |
36,761 |
$ |
86,807 |
$ |
49,202 |
1. Composition of net free cash flow has been revised to exclude net cash flows used in (generated from) discontinued operations.
Return on Capital Employed (“ROCE”)
The Company uses ROCE as a measure of long-term operating performance to measure how effectively management utilizes the capital it is provided. This non-IFRS ratio is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The calculation of ROCE, expressed as a percentage, is Adjusted EBIT (calculated in the manner set out in the table below) divided by the average of the opening and closing capital employed for the 12 months preceding the period end. Capital employed for a period is calculated as total assets at the beginning of that period less total current liabilities.
Year ended December 31, 2024 |
|||||||
2024 |
2023 |
||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (last 12 months) |
$ |
210,099 |
$ |
172,146 |
|||
Less: Depreciation and amortization (last 12 months) |
(48,548 |
) |
(45,099 |
) |
|||
Adjusted EBIT (A) |
$ |
161,551 |
$ |
127,047 |
|||
Total assets at the beginning of the period |
493,757 |
569,543 |
|||||
Less: Total current liabilities at the beginning of the period |
(84,765 |
) |
(134,581 |
) |
|||
Opening Capital Employed (B) |
$ |
408,992 |
$ |
434,962 |
|||
Total assets at the end of the period |
582,036 |
493,757 |
|||||
Less: Current liabilities at the end of the period |
(106,022 |
) |
(84,765 |
) |
|||
Closing Capital employed (C) |
$ |
476,014 |
$ |
408,992 |
|||
Average Capital employed (D)= (B) + (C) /2 |
$ |
442,503 |
$ |
421,977 |
|||
ROCE (A/D) |
37 |
% |
30 |
% |
Net Debt
Net Debt is a non-IFRS financial measure that provides insight regarding the liquidity position of the Company. The calculation of net debt shown below is calculated as nominal undiscounted debt including leases, less cash and cash equivalents. The following sets out the calculation of Net Debt as at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
As at December 31, |
|||||||
2024 |
2023 |
||||||
Loans and other borrowings |
$ |
25,927 |
$ |
32,802 |
|||
Less: Cash and cash equivalents |
(96,410 |
) |
(57,118 |
) |
|||
Net Debt |
$ |
(70,483 |
) |
$ |
(24,316 |
) |
Advertisement 25
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Average Realized Price
The Company uses “average realized price per ounce of gold sold” and “average realized price per ounce of silver sold”, which are non-IFRS financial measures. Average realized metal price represents the revenue from the sale of the underlying metal as per the statement of operations, adjusted to reflect the effect of trading at the holding company level (parent company) on the sales of gold purchased from subsidiaries. Average realized prices are calculated as the revenue related to gold and silver sales divided by the number of ounces of metal sold. The following table sets out the reconciliation of average realized metal prices to sales of gold and sales of silver for the three months and years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
2024 |
2023 |
2024 |
2023 |
|||||||||
Sales of gold from continuing operations |
$ |
144,239 |
$ |
122,530 |
$ |
508,965 |
$ |
425,647 |
||||
Gold sold from continuing operations (oz) |
54,189 |
62,039 |
213,245 |
219,708 |
||||||||
Average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz) |
$ |
2,662 |
$ |
1,975 |
$ |
2,387 |
$ |
1,937 |
||||
Sales of gold from discontinued operations |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
61,516 |
||||
Gold sold from discontinued operations (oz) |
— |
— |
— |
31,737 |
||||||||
Average realized price per ounce of gold sold from discontinued operations ($/oz) |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
1,938 |
||||
Average realized price per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) |
$ |
2,662 |
$ |
1,975 |
$ |
2,387 |
$ |
1,937 |
||||
Sales of silver from continuing operations |
$ |
3,520 |
$ |
4,669 |
$ |
21,239 |
$ |
14,384 |
||||
Silver sold from continuing operations (oz) |
112,142 |
198,427 |
765,611 |
614,756 |
||||||||
Average realized price per ounce of silver sold from continuing operations ($/oz) |
$ |
31 |
$ |
24 |
$ |
28 |
$ |
23 |
||||
Sales of silver from discontinued operations |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
217 |
||||
Silver sold from discontinued operations (oz) |
— |
— |
— |
9,220 |
||||||||
Average realized price per ounce of silver sold from discontinued operations ($/oz) |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
24 |
||||
Average realized price per ounce of silver sold ($/oz) |
$ |
31 |
$ |
24 |
$ |
28 |
$ |
23 |
_________________
1 Average realized price per ounce of gold sold, Cash Cost per ounce of gold from continuing operations, AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations, and net free cash flow are non-IFRS financial measures, and ROCE is a non-IFRS ratio, with no standardized meaning under IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and detailed reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, see “Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures”.
2 Capital investments refers to additions to exploration, property, plant and equipment, and intangibles (which includes asset retirement obligation amounts and leases) for the Nechí Alluvial Property, the Hemco Property, and the La Pepa Project segments. It excludes additions to property, plant and equipment, exploration or intangibles of Mineros and other segments. For additional information as additions to exploration, property, plant and equipment, and intangibles, see Note 7 of our audited consolidated financial statements for the three months and year ended December 31, 2024.
3 For information regarding the composition of sustaining capital expenditures, see Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures – All-In Sustaining Costs in this news release.
4 For additional information regarding segments (Material Properties), see Note 7 of our audited consolidated financial statements for the three months and years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250214272424/en/
Contacts
For further information, please contact:
Ann Wilkinson
Vice President, Investor Relations
+1 416-357-5511
relacion.inversionistas@mineros.com.co
Investor.relations@mineros.com.co
Article content
Share this article in your social network
Comments
Featured Local Savings
Written by John Heinzl on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
I am worried about the impact of tariffs on my portfolio. With respect to investing in U.S. stocks, are Canadian-listed ETFs that employ currency hedging a good way to protect against losses if the Canadian dollar goes down?
I think you’ve got it backward. If you invest in U.S. stocks, either directly or through an exchange-traded fund, a weakening Canadian dollar will actually benefit you.
Consider a simple example. Say you bought a share of a U.S. company trading on the New York Stock Exchange for US$50 when the Canadian dollar was at 75 US cents. The purchase would have cost you $66.67 in Canadian dollars (50/0.75).
Now, suppose the loonie fell to 69 US cents while stock price stayed constant at US$50. Your U.S. stock would now be worth $72.46 in Canadian currency (50/0.69).
As a Canadian investor holding U.S. investments, your enemy is a rising Canadian dollar, not a falling one. If the loonie were to rise to, say, 80 US cents, the U.S. stock trading at US$50 would be worth just $62.50 in Canadian money.
With U.S. President Donald Trump this week slapping 25-per-cent tariffs on imported aluminum and steel and additional tariffs potentially on the way, the consensus seems to be that our struggling dollar – which was trading Friday at around 70.5 US cents – won’t be rallying any time soon.
But currency movements are notoriously difficult to predict, and given the capricious nature of Mr. Trump’s decision making, anything is possible.
So, what to do?
Well, to protect against the risk of a rising loonie, you could purchase a currency-hedged version of a Canadian-listed ETF that invests in U.S. stocks. One example (among many) is the iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-hedged), which trades in Canadian dollars on the Toronto Stock Exchange (ticker symbol: XSP) and holds all of the companies in the S&P 500 index.
There are arguments for and against hedging. If you’re nervous about a potential rise in the Canadian dollar, a hedged ETF should, at least in theory, help to control currency-related volatility. In a perfect world, the hedged ETF would achieve the same return – before taxes and fees – of the underlying index it tracks, regardless of whether the Canadian dollar rises, falls, or remains unchanged against the U.S. dollar.
But in practice, hedging is far from perfect. That’s because the methodology – which involves locking in an exchange rate by buying currency forward contracts, usually for a month at a time – isn’t exact, and also because it adds to the ETF’s costs.
What’s more, if you hedge at the wrong time, you could pay a price.
For the three years from Dec. 31, 2021, through Dec. 31, 2024, the S&P 500 index gained 23.4 per cent, excluding dividends. During the same period, the Canadian dollar tumbled nearly 10 US cents. As a result, Canadian investors who held the non-hedged version of the iShares S&P 500 index ETF (XUS) achieved a significantly higher return of about 40 per cent, thanks to extra juice from the falling loonie. The hedged version (XSP) rose just 19.3 per cent.
Hindsight is 20-20, of course, but the past few years were a terrible time to hedge one’s U.S. exposure.
What about the future? I don’t have a crystal ball, but it’s worth noting that the Canadian dollar has recovered some ground in recent weeks, indicating that the tariff threats are at least partly priced in. Should sanity prevail and an all-out trade war be averted, it’s possible that the loonie could rally.
On the other hand, the loonie could drop further if Mr. Trump follows through on his threat to slap 25-per-cent tariffs on most imports from Canada and Mexico when the 30-day reprieve ends in early March. One hopeful sign is that the pushback from U.S. business leaders opposed to tariffs is getting louder.
As James Farley, chief executive officer of Ford Motor Co., warned this week: “Let’s be real honest. Long term, a 25-per-cent tariff across the Mexico and Canadian border would blow a hole in the U.S. industry that we have never seen.”
Is the risk of a rising loonie high enough to justify hedging one’s U.S. investments? We’ll only know after the fact. In the meantime, if you are worried about a rise in the Canadian dollar, you could compromise by hedging a portion of your U.S. investments while leaving the rest unhedged. That way, regardless of what happens to the Canada-U.S. exchange rate, you will have made the correct call for at least part of your portfolio.
E-mail your questions to jheinzl@globeandmail.com. I’m not able to respond personally to e-mails but I choose certain questions to answer in my column.
Written by TSX Stocks on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
The futures linked to Canada’s major stock index were tepid on Friday as investors awaited further details about U.S. tariffs.
At 6.44 a.m., March futures for the S&P/TSX Index were down 0.03%. ET (1144 GMT).
U.S. president Donald Trump has directed his economic team in order to develop plans for reciprocal duties on countries that tax U.S. imported goods, increasing the risk of a trade war between American allies and enemies.
This directive was issued on Thursday and begins a potentially long investigation into the tariffs imposed by other countries on U.S. products. It does not impose immediate new tariffs.
Trump started a trade conflict earlier this month by first imposing tariffs against Mexico and Canada, then pausing the duties, but continuing to impose them on Chinese goods.
Gold prices are rising on the commodities market. They will likely reach a weekly gain of seven consecutive weeks due to the demand for safe havens amid the growing concern over the global trade conflict.
The oil prices increased as well, ending a three-week streak of weekly declines. This was due to the rising fuel demand.
The S&P/TSX Composite Index of the Toronto Stock Exchange rose on Thursday, as investors remained calm despite tariff threats and signs that inflation in the United States was rising.
The U.S. Retail Sales figures are released on Friday at 8:30 am ET. These numbers are crucial in determining consumer demand. ET.
Investors will be watching closely next week for the Bank of Canada to announce its interest rate policy based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
In the corporate news, TC Energy’s fourth-quarter profits beat expectations on Friday.
CLICK CODES TO GET CANADIAN MARKETS UPDATES:
TSX Market Report
Canadian Dollar and Bond Report
Global Stocks Poll for Canada
Canadian markets directory (Reporting by Ragini Mathur in Bengaluru; Editing by Sahal Muhammed)
(source: Reuters)
Written by Sammy Hudes The Canadian Press on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
Air Canada may reduce flights to certain U.S. destinations later this year if demand from travellers begins to lag, as the airline acknowledged Friday it is coping with uncertainty from the current economic environment, including the threat of tariffs.
The Montreal-based carrier is preparing in case customers decide to fly south of the border less often in 2025, said executive vice-president of revenue and network planning Mark Galardo.
But he cautioned that hasn’t yet been the case, with January booking trends aligning with the company’s expectations.
“We are anticipating proactively that there could be a slowdown,” Galardo told analysts on a conference call, as the airline reported its fourth-quarter earnings.
“In the U.S., we don’t see any major slowdown or anything substantial that would change our view of the market. That being said, if we could de-risk this a little bit and be a bit proactive and move capacity into other sectors we see strength in, I think that’s the right move right now in this context.”
Galardo said leisure destinations such as Florida, Las Vegas and Arizona could be affected if Canadians pull back on travel plans to the U.S.
He said there could be an opportunity to redeploy airplanes to domestic Canadian leisure markets instead.
“It’s still premature to discuss the potential impact, if any, of actual or potential regulatory tariffs or possible retaliations,” Galardo said.
“We’re diligently and continuously monitoring customer behaviour and market dynamics. If these shift in the future, we have ample flexibility to respond by moving capacity around as we’ve always done.”
Despite those preparations, Air Canada maintained its guidance for 2025. In its outlook, the airline said it expects its capacity measured by available seat miles to be up three to five per cent from 2024.
It expects its adjusted cost per available seat mile to range from 14.25 to 14.50 cents.
The carrier reported its adjusted cost per available seat mile for 2024 was 13.80 cents, an increase of 2.3 per cent from 2023.
In its fourth quarter, Air Canada reported a loss of $644 million, compared with a profit of $184 million in the same quarter a year earlier, as its operating revenue increased. The airline said its loss amounted to $1.81 per diluted share for the quarter ended Dec. 31, compared with earnings of 41 cents per diluted share a year ago.
Operating revenue for the quarter totalled $5.4 billion, up from $5.2 billion in the same quarter last year.
On an adjusted basis, Air Canada said it earned 25 cents per diluted share, compared with an adjusted loss of 12 cents per diluted share in the same quarter last year. Analysts on average had expected an adjusted profit of 26 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.
“Overall, we view the results and maintained 2025 guide as positive,” said RBC analyst James McGarragle in a note.
“However, we believe sentiment will be driven by impacts on travel due to tariff uncertainty.”
Chief executive Michael Rousseau said the airline will “continue to navigate uncertainty and external pressures with prudence and decisiveness,” noting Air Canada is prepared to “adapt promptly to any changes or challenges that may arise.”
As of mid-morning, Air Canada shares were trading at $17.89 on the Toronto Stock Exchange, down 33 cents or around 1.8 per cent.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 14, 2025.
Companies in this story: (TSX:AC)
Sammy Hudes, The Canadian Press
Written by TSX Stocks on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
Trusted News Since 1995
A service for global professionals
·
Friday, February 14, 2025
·
786,032,424
Articles
·
3+ Million Readers
Written by Kevin Huhn on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
Germany will hold federal elections on Feb. 23 that will decide whether the left-leaning Social Democratic Party (SDU) will continue to lead the nation or if they will relinquish power to the right-leaning Christian Democratic Union (CDU).
Among the constituencies paying close attention is the country’s young cannabis industry, which saw marijuana reform make substantial advances under the SDU and its coalition partners.
ADVERTISEMENT
The changes included a dramatic liberalization of Germany’s medical cannabis law that resulted in a surge of MMJ patients as well as a new recreational law that, while very modest, opened the door for a possible commercial marijuana market.
These changes have caught the attention of foreign cannabis companies as well, including many from the United States and Canada that are already putting down roots in Germany in anticipation of continued reform and a booming marijuana market.
But if voters break for the CDU, which leads in the polls, reforms could slow or even be reversed.
For now, however, the country’s cannabis market is robust and primed for opportunity.
The price of cannabis in Germany dropped to an all-time low in the fourth quarter of 2024 even as demand for marijuana increased, according to a report by Frankfurt-based Bloomwell GmbH, one of the country’s licensed growers and operators.
In October and November, some medical cannabis strains sold for as low as 3.99 euros ($4.12) per gram.
The average price per gram in November dropped to 8.35 euros, down from 9.27 euros in January 2024, according to Bloomwell’s report “The Cannabis Barometer – 2024 Medical Cannabis Market Trends in Germany.”
Prices dropped even though the number of prescriptions issued were 1,000% higher than in March 2024, indicating a rise in the number of self-paying patients who are responsible for the full cost of their treatment.
ADVERTISEMENT
Niklas Kouparanis, co-founder and CEO of Frankfurt-based Bloomwell Group, called the results surprising.
“Demand is increasing in Germany, so we thought prices would go up,” Kouparanis said.
“It’s the opposite of what we thought, which means the industry was pretty well prepared.”
Although patient numbers continue to rise, Kouparanis predicts the German market will experience oversupply at some point this year as cultivators add capacity to their operations.
Deepak Anand, principal of ASDA Consultancy Services in Surrey, British Columbia, said Germany is expected to surpass an annual supply run rate of 100 tonnes (roughly 110 U.S. tons) and is on track to become one of the world’s largest and most dynamic cannabis medical markets.
As of April 2024, about 300,000 patients in Germany were using medical marijuana, according to Anand.
“The real growth is around imports,” Anand said.
“We’re seeing Canadian companies continue to dominate imports, and we’re seeing additional companies coming.”
New York-based Curaleaf Holdings, which trades as CURA on the Toronto Stock Exchange, is one such company.
In 2022, the multistate operator acquired a 55% stake in Four 20 Pharma, a licensed German producer and distributor of medical cannabis with European Union-Good Manufacturing Practice (EU-GMP) and Good Distribution Practice (GDP) certifications.
The move paved the way for Curaleaf to build a strong foundation in one of the cannabis industry’s critical global markets.
Last April, Curaleaf acquired Northern Green Canada in a move made to “amplify” its strategic advantage in European markets, including Germany.
Juan Martinez, head of Curaleaf International, said Germany is a priority market for the company, and Four 20 Pharma plays a crucial role in strengthening the operator’s leadership in the market.
“Our mission is to expand patient access through cutting-edge research, innovation and evidence-based treatments,” Martinez said.
“It is essential to keep patient care at the center of decision-making and avoid returning to restrictive measures that have proven ineffective in the past.”
Medical cannabis has been permitted in Germany since 2017, albeit under a restrictive model that resulted in a modest number of patients.
But last April 1, a law went into effect in Germany that removed cannabis from its narcotics list, making it much easier for patients to receive a prescription for medical marijuana, which must be sold through licensed pharmacies.
Since then, there has been a surge in the number of medical marijuana patients in Germany.
Under the new medical model, it’s easy for consumers to get prescriptions to purchase cannabis, Anand said.
Consumers can see a physician through a telehealth portal to get a prescription and walk into any pharmacy to have it filled.
“The medical market is the easy way to access cannabis,” Anand said.
“The upcoming election is not expected to disrupt the current momentum, and the strong growth trajectory is likely to continue.”
According to Martinez, “these reforms have helped integrate cannabis into mainstream health care, reducing stigma and allowing patients to seek treatment without unnecessary barriers and an easier path toward insurance coverage.
“It is essential to keep patient care at the center of decision-making and avoid returning to restrictive measures that have proven ineffective in the past.”
Benedikt Sons, co-founder and CEO of Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany-based cannabis distribution company Cansativa Group, said the company is gearing up to manage its supply chain and ensure it has the infrastructure and team members in place to meet demand.
“We see ourselves as a partner and enabler for the entire industry,” Sons said.
“It’s less about competition and more about partnership.”
On the recreational side, Germany’s federal government also passed the Cannabis Act, which allows for the creation of marijuana cultivation social clubs, which are not commercial.
Club members can grow cannabis for themselves and other members, but no product is bought or sold at the clubs, which became operational in July.
Each club allows as many as 500 members, who can each obtain up to 50 grams (roughly 1.8 ounces) of cannabis per month but cannot consume it on-site.
The Cannabis Act also decriminalized possession of up to 25 grams of flower in public and 50 grams at home for adults 18 and older.
The law also allowed home cultivation of up to three cannabis plants per person.
Exclusive industry data and analysis to help you make informed business decisions and avoid costly missteps. All the facts, none of the hype.
Featured inside:
The next phase of the German cannabis market is implementing an adult-use pilot program after the Feb. 23 election.
The conservative Christian Democratic Union is expected to win the election, but Kouparanis said it will need to partner with one of the other parties – the Social Democrats, Free Democrats or Greens.
Under the new adult-use pilot program scheme, companies and scientific institutions can apply for pilot program licenses, which would allow them to sell adult-use products.
Jamie Pearson, president of Montana-based global cannabis consulting firm New Holland Group, said an adult-use program would eventually lead to more American-style dispensaries that allow anyone to purchase flower, edibles and concentrates.
The German government would benefit from the taxes collected, unlike from the country’s tax-free medical marijuana market.
In any cannabis market, the biggest competitors are illicit businesses that don’t have to comply with testing requirements or pay taxes.
But when adult use is permitted, some of the larger companies, such as Curaleaf and Canada’s Aurora Cannabis and Tilray Brands, will expand their retail operations and start branding their stores, Pearson said.
“The biggest competition is going to be the medical market,” Pearson said.
“We will have more cannabis tourism – the recreational program is going to be really geared toward outsiders because people can get cheaper better cannabis in the pharmacies.”
Margaret Jackson can be reached at
Written by Elena Sepp on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
Trusted News Since 1995
A service for global professionals
·
Friday, February 14, 2025
·
786,032,424
Articles
·
3+ Million Readers
Written by TSX Stocks on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
February 14, 2025
U.S. Inflation is heating up again, putting pressure on Trump to cool it on tariffs
Inflation figures released on Feb. 12, 2025, will come as a disappointment to Americans who hoped President Donald Trump would be true to his word on bringing down prices “on Day One.” It will also put pressure on the new administration to be wary of policies that may heat up inflation – and that includes tariffs.
The consumer price index, which measures the change in prices paid by consumers for a representative basket of goods and services, rose unexpectedly from December to January by 0.5 per cent. It means consumers are paying around 3 per cent more on item prices than they were a year ago.
Economists had been expecting the pace of inflation to slow in January.
The news isn’t good for anyone concerned. It means inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s long-run target of 2 per cent – making it harder for the central bank to cut rates at its next meeting on March 19. At its last meeting, the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee kept its benchmark federal funds rate unchanged at a range of 4.25-4.50 per cent.
Following the release of the latest inflation data, markets have a stronger conviction that the Fed will again hold rates steady when it meets in March.
It also means more pain for consumers. Higher interest rates set by the Fed play a large role in determining rates for mortgages, credit cards and auto loans. If January’s rate of inflation were to continue throughout 2025, consumers would see a painful 6.2 per cent annualized inflation rate.
And although it would be churlish to link the latest jump in inflation to an administration just weeks old, it does put into focus the current slate of Trump economic policies. Economists have long warned that imposing tariffs on imports and cutting taxes does little to curb inflation – rather, they may contribute to faster price increases.
Already, China has been hit by a 10 per cent tariff on all products. Trump has also proposed a 25 per cent tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, and he mulled imposing new tariffs on Canada and Mexico – two of the United States’ largest trading partners.
I believe that if these wide-ranging tariffs come into effect, the Federal Reserve will have no choice but to keep rates elevated for the remainder of 2025.
One of the largest drivers of inflation in January was rent increases, which accounted for nearly 30% of all items increase. Rents jumped 4.6 per cent from a year earlier.
If Trump’s tariffs on Canadian imports, like lumber, take effect, Americans can expect continued price increases in the homebuilding sector. Supply and demand imbalances remain a key driver for higher prices, so fewer houses being built due to higher materials cost will likely lead to higher rents.
Consumers saw better news on new vehicle prices, which remained flat over the month and showed slight declines from a year ago.
This is even as demand for new cars increased 2.5 per cent over 2024. In January 2025, the number of new vehicles sold topped the same month a year earlier for the fifth month in a row.
But as with homebuilding, any tariffs on the import of car parts or materials will impact the auto industry. Carmakers may have breathed an immediate breath of relief when Trump delayed new tariffs on Canada and Mexico. But if deals aren’t reached by the March 1 deadline, industry analysts expect immediate impacts on top sellers.
And any higher cost of new cars will have a knock-on effect on used cars, which saw prices jump 2.2 per cent in January – it’s largest increase since May 2023.
Of course, not all inflationary pressures are in the purview of government.
The transportation sector, which includes insurance and parking fees, increased by 8% over the year. Insurance prices soared almost 12 per cent, on the back of last year’s 20.6 per cent increase in prices, while parking fees increased by almost 5 per cent as a result of more expensive repairs and more dangerous driving behaviors.
Meanwhile, with bird flu continuing to spread, egg prices rose a shocking 15.2 per cent in January, and are 53 per cent more expensive than at this time last year.
All in all, voters who cited inflation as the main reason they were backing Trump may be feeling a little uneasy – the administration is only a few weeks old, but for one reason or other, Americans are experiencing ever higher prices with little relief in sight.
The U.S. inflation rate in January came was a surprise to the market and indicates that the Federal Reserve will now be on pause for at least the next few months. This means that the spread between Canada and the U.S. interest rates is likely to widen this year. Canadian CPI data for January will be released next week.
One would have expected the Canadian dollar to circle the drain after the release of the U.S. CPI this week, but the value of the loonie has rallied to the 70 U.S. cent level. This is likely an indication that markets are not paying close attention to the interest rate spreads between Canada and the U.S. but are speculating on the endgame of the tariff situation. The market is clearly indicating that they feel that tariffs are a negotiating ploy and not an endgame for the U.S. administration.
The market may or may not be right, but there is no question that inflation trajectories for the U.S. and Canada are completely in opposite direction. Canadian inflation rates continue to drop and are on a downward trajectory, especially as interest rates decline. On the other hand, inflation in the U.S., even without tariffs, is still climbing.
Look for the loonie to drop in the coming months on the fundamentals of the economies on both sides of the border will drive the currency lower. The installation of tariffs on Canada would only accelerate the decline in the loonie. All of the rest of the drama is just noise.
Buhler Industries going private
Buhler Industries intends to go private.
The publicly-traded Winnipeg firm, founded by the late John Buhler, will be absorbed entirely by the Turkish firm ASKO under a proposed deal.
Buhler Industries was established in 1969 when John Buhler purchased the Standard Gas Engine Works. The company produced the Farm King line of grain augers, snowblowers, mowers and other small implements. In 1982 Buhler purchased the Allied line of front-end loaders. In 2000 it purchased the Versatile tractor line from New Holland Ag, as part of the Case-New Holland merger and subsequent divestiture required by competition regulators. It operates eight manufacturing plants throughout North America.
The purchaser, ASKO, is wholly-owned by the Konukoğlu family. ASKO owns the firm Basak Traktor, which purchased 80 per cent of Buhler Industries from Russian combine manufacturer Rostselmach. Currently ASKO owns 96.7 per cent of the firm’s shares.
Following the completion of the amalgamation, the shares will be de-listed from the Toronto Stock Exchange and the company will apply to cease to be a reporting issuer under applicable Canadian securities laws.
ASKO owns firms worldwide that manufacture construction equipment, energy and technology equipment, and agricultural equipment including tractors. As well as building and marketing its own equipment, it also manufactures tractors for the German firm CLAAS.
India’s retail inflation eases to 5-month low, boosting rate cut hopes
India’s retail inflation slowed to a five-month low in January as food price inflation eased, boosting the odds of another rate cut in the South Asian economy where growth is slowing amid the escalating threat of a global trade war.
Annual retail inflation in January was at 4.31 per cent, lower than economists’ estimate of 4.6 per cent and 5.22 per cent in the previous month. Retail inflation was at 3.65 per cent in August 2024.
Food inflation eased to 6.02 per cent from 8.39 per cent in December.
Cooling inflation boosts chances of further policy easing by India’s central bank, which cut its key policy rate for the first time in nearly five years in February in a bid to boost an economy that is expected to grow at its slowest pace in four years.
The Reserve Bank of India sees inflation averaging 4.8 per cent in the current financial year that ends on March 31 and expects it to fall to 4.2 per cent next year, it said last week.
“The sharp fall in Indian headline consumer price inflation in January reinforces that the RBI will continue to loosen monetary policy over the coming months to support the economy,” said Harry Chambers, an economist at Capital Economics.
The central bank targets inflation at 4 per cent within a tolerance band of 2 percentage points on either side.
In January, vegetable prices rose 11.35 per cent year-on-year, compared with a 26.60 per cent increase in the previous month.
Prices of cereals rose 6.24 per cent against a 6.50 per cent gain in December, while those of pulses gained 2.59 per cent against 3.80 per cent. Prices of vegetables and pulses fell from the previous month.
Winter harvests have helped moderate food prices, but warmer-than-usual temperatures in March could pose risks to crops like wheat.
Core inflation, which excludes volatile items such as food and energy and is seen as a better gauge of domestic demand, quickened to 3.7 per cent in January from 3.6 per cent in the previous month, according to two economists.
Last week, RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra said the central bank is alert to all pressures on inflation and will be watchful of the impact of rupee depreciation on local prices.
A 5 per cent depreciation in the rupee impacts domestic inflation to the extent of 30 basis points to 35 basis points, he said.
A potential trade war dragged the rupee to its lifetime low of 87.95 per U.S. dollar in February, boosting worries about higher inflation on imported goods.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade advisers were finalising plans on Wednesday for the reciprocal tariffs the president has vowed to impose on every country that charges duties on U.S. imports, ratcheting up fears of a widening global trade war.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to propose increased energy and defence imports during a two-day U.S. visit from Wednesday.
France raises soft wheat area estimate
France raises soft wheat area estimate but cautious on harvest outlook
France’s farm ministry on Tuesday increased its estimate of the winter soft wheat area for this year’s harvest, confirming a rebound from last year’s rain-hit planting while warning that soggy conditions could also hurt the 2025 crop.
Last year France, the European Union’s biggest grain grower, gathered its smallest soft wheat crop since the 1980s after months of heavy rain, contributing to a slump in exports.
A dry end to last autumn let growers complete most sowing for 2025, but downpours in January have kept some fields drenched.
For winter soft wheat, France’s main cereal crop, the ministry raised its area estimate for 2025 to 4.57 million hectares from 4.51 million in its initial projection in December.
The revised estimate was up 10 per cent compared with the area harvested in 2024 and 0.4 per cent above the average area of the past five years, the ministry said in a report.
For other crops, the estimated winter barley area was trimmed to 1.21 million hectares from 1.23 million projected in December, now down 2.1 per cent from 2024 and 3.5 per cent below the five-year average, with the ministry noting some sowing was postponed in favour of spring crops.
For winter rapeseed, the expected area was lowered to 1.27 million hectares from 1.34 million, now down 4.1 per cent from last year though 6.2 per cent above the five-year average.
For durum wheat, the variety used in pasta, the area sown with winter crop was pegged at 198,000 hectares, down from 206,000 hectares forecast in December and a new 30-year low.
Wheat and rapeseed are almost exclusively winter crops in France while barley production also includes a significant portion of spring crop.
Kazakhstan says grain transit issues with Russia resolved
Kazakhstan has resolved most of its grain transit and transhipment issues with Russia, allowing grain exports to Europe and North Africa through Russia’s Baltic ports to flow unhindered, the country’s agriculture minister said on Tuesday.
Ex-Soviet neighbours Russia and Kazakhstan, both members of the Eurasian Economic Union, have been in a grain trade dispute since last year with both countries banning each other’s grain from their domestic markets.
Kazakhstan, which only has access to the inland Caspian Sea and relies on Russian ports for exports, had a record grain harvest of 26.7 million tonnes in 2024 and plans to export 6.5 million tonnes with 1.5 million tonnes going to Europe and North Africa.
Russia allowed transit of Kazakh grain through its ports last November, but on condition the grain was loaded directly from railcars into vessels without going into temporary storage, creating logistical problems for Kazakh exporters.
“Issues with grain, legumes, and oilseed crops have been resolved. The rail cars are no longer standing idle at the transshipment points as they used to. We have resolved this promptly, and exports are being shipped,” said Agriculture Minister Aidarbek Saparov.
Egypt imported 6.3 million tonnes of Russian wheat in 2024/25
Egypt, the biggest buyer of Russian wheat, imported 6.3 metric tonnes from July 2024 to January 2025, a 70 per cent increase compared to last year, analysts from rail carrier Rusagrotrans said in a report published on Monday.
Rusagrotrans said wheat exports from Russia continued at a record pace so far this season with the country, the world’s top wheat exporter, shipping 32.2 million tonnes, 1.3 per cent more than in the same period of the last season.
The acceleration precedes new export quotas on February 15 that will slow shipments. In line with the new quotas Russia can export 10.6 million tonnes of wheat before July 1, 2025.
Bangladesh, which bought 2.3 million tonnes, emerged as the second-largest buyer in the 2024/25 season, while Turkey, which introduced an import ban to protect its domestic market, slipped to third place with a 47 per cent drop in Russian wheat imports.
Algeria, which bought 1.7 million tonnes of Russian wheat, and Kenya, which bought 1.4 million tonnes, were the fourth and the fifth largest importers.
WK Kellogg forecasts upbeat 2025 profit on cost cut efforts
WK Kellogg forecast annual profit above expectations on Tuesday and reported better-than-expected earnings as the breakfast cereal maker’s efforts to clamp down on costs boosted its margins.
Battle Creek, Michigan-based WK Kellogg had announced a reorganization plan in August involving plant closures, workforce reduction and plans to streamline its supply chain by investing in modernizing its equipment and infrastructure.
The cost-cutting effort helped the company post an adjusted profit of 42 cents per share for the fourth quarter ended December 28, and beat analysts’ estimates of 26 cents per share, according to data compiled by LSEG.
The company expects full-year net adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) between $286 million and $292 million, compared with analysts’ estimate of $283.2 million.
The company has also had to raise prices to offset higher raw material costs, which have in turn led to budget-strained customers cutting back spending on packaged food such as cereal.
The cereal maker’s product pricing rose 3.8 per cent in the quarter, while volume slumped 5.6 per cent. The higher prices helped the company’s margins rise to 8.9 per cent.
WK Kellogg’s net sales fell 1.8 per cent to $640 million in the quarter, compared with analysts’ average expectation of $641.7 million.
WHO says communication with US authorities on H5N1 bird flu a ‘challenge’
A World Health Organization spokesperson said on Tuesday that communication on bird flu had become challenging since President Donald Trump announced a U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations health agency.
Asked about communication received by the WHO from Washington on the H5N1 outbreak, Christian Lindmeier told a press briefing in Geneva: “Communication is a challenge indeed. The traditional ways of contact have been cut.”
He declined to elaborate.
A U.S. outbreak of the H5N1 virus has infected nearly 70 people, mostly farm workers, since April 2024. The U.S. Department of Agriculture reported for the first time last week that a second strain of bird flu was found in dairy cattle in Nevada, a discovery that ramped up concerns about the U.S. outbreak.
Under WHO rules known as the International Health Regulations (IHR), countries have binding obligations to communicate on public health events that have the potential to cross borders. These include advising the WHO immediately of a health emergency and measures on trade and travel.
Other countries have privately voiced concern at the idea that the United States would stop communicating about emerging viruses that could become the next pandemic. “If such a big country does not report anymore, what message does it send?” said a Western diplomat in Geneva.
Argentina has also said it plans to withdraw from the WHO, citing “deep differences” regarding the agency’s management of health issues, notably the COVID-19 pandemic.
Canadian pulse exports slow down in December
Canadian pea and lentil exports slowed down in December compared to the previous month, although year-to-date movement remains solid as India remains in the market for the time being.
Canada exported 171,007 tonnes of peas in December, which was down 15 per cent from the previous month, according to Statistics Canada trade data. However, year-to-date pea exports of 1.438 million tonnes were running about 200,000 tonnes ahead of the year-ago pace.
India was the top buyer through five months, accounting for nearly half of the total pea exports at 694,391 tonnes. China, Bangladesh and the United States were also large export destinations for Canadian peas.
Canadian pea sales to India have picked up considerably over the past year after India lifted import tariffs on yellow peas in December 2023. The duty-free period has been extended several times over the past year but is set to expire once again on Feb. 28. The last extension at the end of December was made just a week ahead of expiry, although market participants are uncertain what will happen this month.
A similar Indian policy on duty-free imports of pigeon peas, a type of yellow lentil also called tur in India, was recently extended for another year to March 31, 2026. Canada does not grow pigeon peas, but yellow peas can be used as substitute.
The duty-free pea movement has cut into domestic prices in India. While that benefits consumers, farmers in the country have expressed concern and have called on the government to raise duties once again.
Canadian lentil exports were down five per cent in December compared to November, with about 253,000 tonnes moved out of the country. Crop-year-to-date exports of 1.083 million tonnes were up 27 per cent.
India was also the largest buyer of lentils so far this marketing year, accounting for 38 per cent of the total.
Canada exported about 20,000 tonnes of chickpeas in December, which was in line with the 20,400 tonnes moved the previous month. Year-to-date chickpea exports at 73,236 tonnes are running 26 per cent behind the 2023-24 pace.
Turkey and Pakistan are the top destinations for Canadian chickpeas in 2024-25, each importing around 12,600 tonnes during the first five months of the marketing year. The U.S., Italy and India round out the top five export destinations.
Early flooding has little effect on soybean oil, protein composition U.S. study suggests
While flooding substantially decreases soybean yields, it needn’t impact seed composition, including protein and oil content, a recent University of Arkansas study found.
The two-year study looked at 31 different soybean varieties, including some bred to be flood tolerant or moderately flood tolerant, and more susceptible varieties. Researchers examined the effects of four days of partial submergence on soybeans in the R1 or early flowering stage.
“Flooding research has focused on the early reproductive stage simply because it is when the stress is most pronounced and causes the greatest yield loss,” said researcher Caio Vieira in a Feb. 3 news release.
The most flood-tolerant varieties lost about 33 per cent of yield after being flooded, while the most susceptible plants lost just over half of their yield potential. However, no significant impacts on seed protein or oil content were observed across the different varieties.
Viera said temperature changes in the U.S. have allowed earlier soybean planting, while shifting rain patterns have put additional stress on soy plants.
“We’re pretty much getting the potential for flooding throughout the season. It’s been tougher,” he said.
Arkansas farmers typically plant soy from early April to mid-Mary, putting the R1 stage in late June or early July.
“It can be hit or miss,” Vieira said. “You can get a year where that period is a full-on drought, or you can get a year where that typical R1 period is completely wet with intensive rains. It’s hard, hard to predict.”
Arkansas can also see the remnants of hurricanes roll through. This happened twice in September, the news release noted.
Vieira said the study will help his team identify and incorporate flood-tolerant characteristics into future soybean genetics.
USDA trims Argentina corn, soy harvest estimates after dry weather
Argentina, a major grain supplier, will harvest less corn and soy than previously expected after hot, dry weather hurt crops, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said on Tuesday.
Grain traders have been closely monitoring dryness in Argentina because it is the world’s top exporter of soyoil and meal, the No. 3 exporter of corn, and competes with the U.S. for global grain and soy sales.
Corn production is particularly important because world inventories for 2024-25 are projected to drop to their lowest level in a decade due to robust demand and a smaller than anticipated U.S. harvest last year.
Corn and soy futures prices turned lower at the Chicago Board of Trade after USDA updated its crop estimates, as traders anticipated lower production in Argentina.
USDA pegged Argentina’s corn crop at 50 million tonnes in a monthly report, down from 51 million in January. The agency pegged soybean production at 49 million tonnes, down from 52 million last month.
Analysts surveyed by Reuters were expecting 49.5 million tonnes of corn and 50.49 million tonnes of soybeans.
“This is a valid, light cut,” said Rich Nelson, chief strategist at brokerage Allendale.
Rains benefited Argentina’s crops recently but did not reach all growing areas, and some damage was already done, analysts said. Farmers have found smaller than usual corn cobs and yellowing crop leaves in their fields at a time when they should be green.
USDA also lowered its estimate for Brazil’s corn crop to 126 million tonnes from 127 million in January.
In the U.S., estimates for corn and soy inventories were left unchanged from January.
Brazil beef, chicken exports set record for January
Beef shipments totaled 209,192 tons in January, with more than $1 billion in revenue, said beef lobby Abiec.
Chicken meat exports totaled 443,000 tons in January, an increase of 9.4% compared to the same period last year, and generated $826.4 million in revenue, according to pork and chicken lobby ABPA.
The increase (in beef volume and value of exports) occurred in practically all the main destination markets, reaching the best average since June 2023,” said Abiec.
“China, the Philippines, and other markets have maintained a significant positive flow of imports of Brazilian (chicken) products, reinforcing the positive outlook regarding the behavior of these markets throughout the year,” ABPA president Ricardo Santin said in a note.
Brazil is the world’s largest exporter of beef and chicken and home to some of the industry’s largest players.
Brazil is expected to see positive results for chicken exports in February, Santin said, with demand from Mexico expected to continue to generate business for Brazil.
Former Saskatchewan farm leader, Todd Lewis, appointed to Senate
Todd Lewis, the former president of the Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan and vice president of the Canadian Federation of Agriculture was appointed to the Canadian Senate on Feb. 7. Lewis, a fourth-generation farmer, said he was encouraged to apply by the increasing role the Senate has had in the parliamentary process the last few years, particularly since the minority government was elected in 2021. Lewis is also heavily involved with his local community as municipal councillor, volunteer firefighter and board member on numerous committees.
“Ag in general, especially western Canadian ag, has been under-represented in the chamber,” said Lewis after his appointment.
Trump readies reciprocal tariffs as trade war fears mount
Donald Trump’s on-again/off-again trade threats continued during the week, as he announced he would impose tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports entering the U.S. beginning March 12. The move, coming less than a week after he announced a month-long delay to broad tariffs on Canada and Mexico, drew condemnation from most U.S. trade partners.
With many, including Canada, vowing retaliation, Trump’s advisors were reportedly finalizing plans of their own reciprocal tariffs — ratcheting up fears of a widening global trade war and threatening to add to already-sticky U.S. inflation.
Feeder market stalls; cold temperatures, tariff threat limit sales
The Western Canadian feeder cattle market was hard to define during the first week of February, with prices softer earlier in the week, but creeping higher by Friday, Feb. 7. Volumes were limited, as frigid temperatures in Alberta made it too cold to market cattle or operate sales barns. In addition, the threat of U.S. tariffs caused producers to hold back on sales. Although the implementation of U.S. tariffs and Canadian retaliatory measures were delayed for 30 days, it was too late to plan for the week.
Durum yields falling behind spring wheat
Average durum yields in Saskatchewan have behind spring wheat over the past decade, according to research from the University of Saskatchewan. Prior to 2015, spring wheat and durum yields in the province were relatively similar, but data over the past 10 years has seen spring wheat yields climb higher while durum held steady, with a yield gap of seven to 15 bushels per acre.
Curtis Pozniak, a University of Saskatchewan wheat breeder, believes the yield gap between Canadian Western Red Spring (CWRS) wheat and Canadian Western Amber Durum (CWAD) can be partly explained by the varieties that are used. “Farmers are adopting CWRS varieties more quickly than they are with durum,” said Pozniak, who spoke at the 2025 Durum Summit held Jan. 30 in Swift Current. “Growers that are focusing on CWRS wheat, their on-farm yield potential is increasing at a faster rate than what we see in durum wheat…. Growers of CWRS wheat are adopting the latest genetics a lot sooner than they are for durum wheat,” he added.
Canada seeks stronger EU trade ties as both regions threatened by Trump tariffs
Canada wants to deepen its economic ties with the European Union and uphold global trading rules in the face of threatened U.S. tariffs, trade minister Mary Ng told Reuters on Feb. 8 after meeting with European leaders.
The EU and Canada have benefited from a free trade agreement since 2017, which has boosted bilateral trade by 65 per cent, and set up a raw materials partnership in 2021.
“Trade agreements are one thing, and we have seen really great numbers, but what more can we be doing to help Canadian businesses enter into any of the 27 member states…and what more can we do to the same in Canada” Ng said. She said critical minerals and smaller businesses would be among the focus areas with the EU. Canada is also pushing to diversify its exports and set itself a target in 2018 of increasing non-U.S. exports by 50 per cent by 2025. Ng said the country was on track to meet or exceed the target.
Canadian premiers in Washington, D.C.
Canada’s 13 provincial and territorial premiers went to Washington, D.C. on February 12 to meet with United States lawmakers and special interest groups. Led by Ontario Premier Doug Ford, the current chair of the Council of the Federation, the premiers will try to drum up support against the tariffs President Donald Trump plans to impose on Canada.
Brazil’s Conab raises grain output forecast on bigger corn crop
Crop agency Conab on Thursday raised its forecast for total Brazilian grain supplies in the 2024/25 season to 325.71 million tonnes from 322.25 million tonnes based on expectations of a bigger corn crop.
Conab said Brazil’s total corn crop will reach 122.01 million tonnes, up almost 2.5 million tonnes from a January forecast. The revision reflected mainly better prospects for the country’s second corn crop, which is planted after soybeans are harvested in the same areas and represents about three quarters of supplies in a given year.
To date, conditions for planting of Brazil’s second corn crop are favourable, but February “will be a decisive” month for the sowing within the ideal climate window, Conab said.
Second corn sowing reached 5.3 per cent of the expected planted area in the country, way below the 19.3 per cent at this time last year, Conab said.
Overall, the agency expects Brazilian farmers to plant 16.8 million hectares (41.513 million acres) with second corn this year, an area 2.4 per cent larger than last season’s.
Conab slightly lowered Brazil’s soybean supply forecast to 166.01 million tons in the same report, citing “irreversible crop losses” in the south of the country caused by dry weather.
“Soybean cultivation has faced serious difficulties due to drought,” Conab said referring to Brazil’s southernmost state of Rio Grande do Sul, one of the country’s biggest suppliers.
Conab said some places there have benefited from occasional rains while in others rains have been scarce or irregular, damaging plants. The same goes for Mato Grosso do Sul state, according to Conab.
Strategie Grains lifts EU 2025/26 wheat output forecast
French consultancy Strategie Grains has slightly increased its wheat production forecast for the European Union in the 2025/26 season due to a larger than expected planted area in France.
The EU’s soft wheat output is now expected to reach 127.7 million tonnes, up from 127.2 million tonnes forecast last month and significantly higher than the 113.7 million tonnes projected for 2024/25.
This adjustment reflects improved planting conditions and a response to competitive market dynamics.
“As winter draws to a close, growing conditions for soft wheat and winter barley remain better than last year across the EU,” Strategie Grains said in a report.
“However, the threat of yield losses persists due to excess moisture in west Europe and lack of rain in southeast Europe,” it added.
European cereal production in 2025/26 is under close scrutiny after smaller harvests in 2024 led to tight balance sheets and reduced exports.
In another update, Strategie Grains slightly lowered its forecast for maize production in the EU for the 2025/26 season.
Maize production is now projected at 59.9 million tonnes, down from 60.3 million tonnes forecast last month but up from 58.1 million tonnes in 2024/25. The decrease is attributed to a reduction in maize acreage due to increased winter crop planting.
Strategie Grains raised its forecast for EU soft wheat shipments outside the bloc in 2024/25, mainly due to larger exports from the northeast EU countries, which supply high-quality wheat, but total exports would remain about 10 million tonnes below last season.
For 2025/26, wheat and barley shipments would rebound against the backdrop of larger harvests and reduced availability in other exporting countries.
EU maize imports in 2025/26 would remain above the 20 million tonnes threshold projected for the current season, as production is set to rise only very moderately.
Strategie Grains sees a potential small increase in EU grain prices for the remainder of 2024/25. In 2025/26, the price average for maize is forecast lower than its 2024/25 level, whilst that of soft wheat and barley would be higher.
Canadian dollar futures posted gains as they ended the week at 69.95 U.S. cents. The initial tariff threats on Monday pushed the dollar down close to the 68 U.S. cent level before rallying later in the week.
Wheat futures pushed higher during the past week with the nearby Chicago contract up by 21 cents per bushel while Kansas City and Minneapolis futures closed the week up by 20 and nine cents per bushel, respectively. Spring wheat cash prices in Western Canada, conversely moved lower with cash prices dropping by C$2.18 per tonne to C$8.92 per tonne. Strength in the Canadian dollar did pressure cash wheat prices during the past week. Wheat prices were also hurt by the threat of U.S. tariffs at the beginning of March.
Corn futures were up slightly this past week by posting gains of five cents per bushel. Oat futures also posted strong gains of 15 cents per bushel during the past seven days. Cash oat prices in central Saskatchewan moved up by C$10 per tonne during the past week.
Canola futures were modestly higher this week, with the nearby futures contracts gaining C$2.80 per tonne. Cash prices for canola were mixed and ranged from down 0.70 cents per tonne to up by C$1.15 per tonne during the week.
Nearby soybean futures were modestly higher and increased by 16 cents per bushel. Soybean oil futures were stronger during the past week with the nearby contract up by 0.42 cents per pound. Soybean meal futures were slightly stronger during the past week, with the nearby contract up by US$1.70 per short ton.
Cattle futures prices were moved lower last week with slaughter cattle dropping by US$4.72 per hundredweight. Feeder cattle contracts were also lower with the nearby contracts down by US$7.90 per cwt. Nearby hog futures were close to unchanged this past week with the nearby contract down by only 17 cents per cwt.
Weekly Chicago March Corn Futures
Weekly Chicago March Wheat Futures
Weekly Minneapolis March Wheat Futures
Weekly Kansas City March Wheat Futures
Weekly Chicago Soybeans March Futures
Weekly ICE Canola March Futures
Ukraine sold down the river
The recent pronouncements from the U.S. administration indicate that Ukraine has been thrown under the bus. It seems that the quick peace deal that the U.S. has promised involves giving Putin most of wheat he wants. The U.S. administration has indicated that they are willing to cede Ukrainian territory to Russia, limit the size and capabilities of the Ukrainian military and make sure that Ukraine never joins the NATO alliance. Ukraine has pushed back on the U.S. plan and indicates that it will continue to fight Russian aggression. The problem is that without U.S. backing, Ukraine will have great difficulty in sustaining the war even with European and Canadian support.
This is a horrible outcome for democracy and indicates that the U.S. is actively extricating itself from the international world order. By giving into Putin, it signals that larger countries can invade smaller ones without any consequence.
A resolution to the conflict, as unfair as it would be, would likely “normalize” the flow of grains and oilseeds from the Black Sea region. The resumption of “normal” exports would likely pressure global commodity prices, especially for wheat. This will increase the competitiveness of the Black Sea region as exports restrictions are lifted in the region. Keep this in mind as the situation evolves.
The real tragedy is not economic, but the loss of Ukraine’s dream of independence. Even if a peace agreement is reached, there will be no guarantee that the country won’t return to the Russian sphere of influence. Since the independence of Ukraine, meddling in Ukrainian politics has been a constant. The end game will likely be Russia conquering Ukraine by force or by installing their own puppet government. This is a sad reality for Ukraine and diaspora located in Canada and around the world.
Written by Divya Rajagopal and Felix Njini on . Posted in Canada. Leave a Comment
By Divya Rajagopal and Felix Njini
TORONTO (Reuters) -Barrick Gold will resume operations at its shuttered Loulo-Gounkoto mine in Mali once authorities in the country allow it to resume gold shipments, CEO Mark Bristow said on Wednesday.
The Toronto-based miner said it has been assured by Mali that gold worth about $245 million seized by authorities still belongs to the company, Bristow told Reuters in Toronto. Mali and Barrick have been locked in a dispute since last October over implementation of the country’s new mining code.
The miner’s shares rose as much as 6% on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Wednesday morning after it reported that its profit surged last year, buoyed by a rally in bullion prices. Barrick also announced a new $1 billion share buyback program.
Tensions between Mali and Barrick, the country’s largest investor, escalated when authorities detained four of the company’s employees, issued an arrest warrant for Bristow and earlier this year seized gold stockpiled at Barrick’s mine site.
The government had earlier blocked Barrick’s shipments from Loulo-Gounkoto before seizing the gold.
“We will start the operations as soon as we get approval to ship the gold and we need to ship the gold to pay anything to the government,” Bristow said.
He said that Barrick paid $460 million to the Mali government last year and would have contributed about $550 million to the nation’s treasury this year if operations had not been suspended.
Barrick lowered its gold output forecast this year to between 3.2 million ounces and 3.5 million ounces due to the temporary halt at the Mali mine.
Mali’s aggressive push for higher taxes and a bigger state shareholding in mining projects has soured ties with its mining investors. Gold output plunged 23% to 51 metric tons last year, the nation’s mines ministry said.
Both Mali and Barrick are losing out from the closure of Loulo-Gounkoto, Bristow said.
“So if you calculate that to per week… and every week we don’t do this it hurts everyone,” he said.
Barrick has also filed for an international arbitration against Mali to find a resolution to the dispute.
Despite the tension with authorities, Barrick still considers Mali a long-term investment destination, and wants to maintain a presence in the country, Bristow said.
(Reporting by Divya Rajagopal; Writing by Felix Njini; Editing by Caroline Stauffer and Emelia Sithole-Matarise)
Comments