Category: Canada

Mineros Reports Third Quarter 2024 Financial and Operating Results

Article content

MEDELLIN, Colombia — Mineros S.A. (TSX:MSA, MINEROS:CB) (“Mineros” or the “Company”) today reported its financial and operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. All dollar amounts – other than per share amounts – are expressed in thousands of US dollars unless otherwise stated. For further information, please see the Company’s unaudited condensed interim financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis posted on Mineros’ website https://mineros.com.co/en/investors/financial-reports and filed under its Mineros’ profile on www.sedarplus.com.

Advertisement 2

Story continues below

Article content

Andrés Restrepo, President and Chief Executive Officer of Mineros, commented: “We are pleased with our results for the third quarter. From a financial perspective, high and rising gold prices provided us with a margin of just over $800 per ounce of gold sold which led to $28.5 million in net profit or $0.10 per share from the production and sale of 53,612 ounces of gold at an average price $2,477. From an operational perspective our Hemco operation is running smoothly and our partnership with artisanal miners under the Bonanza model continues to deliver good results aligned with our vision of bringing benefit to all stakeholders. While our Nechí Alluvial operation was behind guidance for annual production, we have identified and are implementing efficient measures to improve production. We are proud of the work we do in the El Bagre area and continue our efforts to effect positive change in the lives of locals through participation in formalizing some informal miners working alongside us. Cash Cost and all-in sustaining costs remain at or above the higher end of guidance for our operations. Accordingly, we have refined both our cost guidance and production guidance for 2024.”

HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE AND NINE SEPTEMBER 30, 2024

  • For the three months ended September 30, 2024:
    • Net profit of $28,507;
    • Earnings per share of $0.10;
    • Average realized price per ounce of gold sold1 of $2,477;
    • Cost of sales of $86,234;
    • Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations1 of $1,235;
    • All-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations1 of $1,481;
    • Net cash flows generated by operating activities of $53,751;
    • Net free cash flow1 of $38,816; and
    • Dividends paid of $7,476.
  • For the nine months ended September 30, 2024:
    • Net profit of $63,357;
    • Earnings per share of $0.21;
    • Average realized price per ounce of gold sold of $2,293;
    • Cost of sales of $258,903;
    • Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations of $1,239;
    • AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations of $1,475;
    • Net free cash flow of $30,101;
    • Dividends paid of $20,188; and
    • Return on capital employed1 (“ROCE”) of 37%.
  • Guidance for consolidated annual gold production has been revised from 209,000 oz – 229,000 oz to 203,000 oz – 218,000 oz, primarily as a result of lower than expected production at the Nechi Alluvial property. Guidance for consolidated annual Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold has been revised from $1,180 – $1,270 to $1,250 – $1,330, and consolidated AISC per ounce of gold sold has been revised from $1,430 – $1,530 to $1,480 – $1,570. Cost guidance revisions primarily result from lower than expected production at the Nechi Alluvial Property, higher than expected gold prices, which increases the cost of artisanal production at the Hemco Property, and differences between actual and expected inflation and exchange rates. For details, including revised production and cost guidance on a per-property basis, see “Outlook” in this news release.

Advertisement 3

Story continues below

Article content

Dividends declared

On March 26, 2024, the General Shareholders Assembly approved the distribution of the Company’s profits by way of: (i) an annual ordinary dividend of $0.075 per share, payable quarterly, in four equal installments of $0.01875, and (ii) an extraordinary dividend of $0.025 per share, payable quarterly, in four equal installments of $0.00625, representing a total annual distribution of $0.10 per share, or approximately $29,974 in total for the year, calculated based on the number of shares issued and subscribed as at March 31, 2024. This represents a payout increase of 42.8% compared with last year’s dividend.

The future Canadian record dates and Canadian/Colombian payment dates for the ordinary and extraordinary dividends are set out in the table directly below:

Amount per share

Record Date

Payment Date

($)

(COP$)

Ordinary Dividend

January 9, 2025

January 16, 2025

0.01875

74.1

Extraordinary Dividend

January 9, 2025

January 16, 2025

0.00625

24.7

FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2024

The following table summarizes quarterly financial highlights for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023.

Three Months
Ended

September 30,

Change

Nine Months
Ended

September 30,

Change

2024

2023

2024

2023

($)

($)2

($)

(%)

($)

($)2

($)

%

Revenue

140,876

101,371

39,505

39

388,408

316,863

71,545

23

Cost of sales

(86,234)

(75,658)

(10,576)

14

(258,903)

(219,225)

39,678

18

Gross Profit

54,642

25,713

28,929

113

129,505

97,638

31,867

33

Profit for the period from continuing operations

28,507

13,284

15,223

115

63,357

51,730

11,627

22

Loss for the period from discontinued operations

(45,791)

45,791

(100)

(56,281)

56,281

(100)

Net Profit for the period

28,507

(32,507)

61,014

188

63,357

(4,551)

67,908

1,492

Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations ($/share)

0.10

0.04

0.05

115

0.21

0.17

0.04

22

Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing and discontinued operations ($/share)

0.10

(0.11)

0.20

188

0.21

(0.02)

0.23

1,492

Average realized price per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) 1

2,477

1,923

554

29

2,293

1,925

368

19

Average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz)1

2,477

1,921

555

29

2,293

1,922

371

19

Average realized price per ounce of gold sold from discontinued operations ($/oz) 1

1,928

(1,928)

(100)

1,938

(1,938)

(100)

Adjusted EBITDA1

62,903

33,379

29,524

88

153,204

118,782

34,422

29

Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz) 1

1,235

1,180

55

5

1,239

1,085

154

14

AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz) 1

1,481

1,407

74

5

1,475

1,292

183

14

Net cash flows generated by operating activities

53,751

4,324

49,427

1,143

70,971

36,976

33,995

92

Net free cash flow1

38,816

911

37,905

4,161

30,101

12,441

17,660

142

ROCE1

37%

26%

11%

40%

37%

26%

11%

40 %

Net Debt 1

(28,409)

759

(29,168)

(3,843)

(28,409)

759

(29,168)

(3,843)

Dividends paid

7,476

5,241

2,235

43

20,188

15,291

4,897

32

Article content

Advertisement 4

Story continues below

Article content

  1. Average realized price per ounce of gold sold, average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations, average realized price per ounce of gold sold from discontinued operations, Adjusted EBITDA, Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations, AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations, net free cash flow and Net Debt are non-IFRS financial measures, and ROCE is a non-IFRS ratio, with no standardized meaning under IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and detailed reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, see Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures in this news release.

Financial Highlights for the three months ended September 30, 2024

  • Revenue increased by 39%: Revenue totaled $140,876 during the third quarter of 2024, compared with $101,371 in the third quarter of 2023, with sales of gold of $132,788 at an average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations of $2,477, during the third quarter of 2024 compared with sales of gold of $96,450 at an average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations of $1,921 in the same period in 2023. The increase in revenue in the third quarter of 2024 is mainly explained by a 29% increase in average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations, a 7% increase in ounces of gold sold, and a 74% increase in sales of silver of $2,353;
  • Cost of sales increased by 14% to $86,234 during the third quarter of 2024, compared with $75,658 in the third quarter of 2023. This increase was primarily due to: (i) the higher price of gold increasing the costs to purchase ore from artisanal miners by $6,291; (ii) greater depreciation and amortization relating to our operations of $1,311; and (iii) higher operating expenses across the Company’s operations generally, driven by inflation which increased maintenance and materials cost of $372, and service and labour costs of $1,215 and $1,719 respectively;
  • Gross Profit from continuing operations increased by 113% to $54,642 in the third quarter of 2024, compared with $25,713 in the third quarter of 2023, mainly due to higher revenue as noted above;
  • Profit for the period from continuing operations up by 115%, to $28,507 or $0.10 per share during the third quarter of 2024 compared with $13,284 or $0.04 per share during the third quarter of 2023. The increase in profit is mainly explained by higher gold prices resulting in greater revenue and gross profit as explained above, partially offset by higher costs to purchase ore from artisanal miners. Profit for the period was also impacted by higher foreign exchange differences of $1,023;

Advertisement 5

Story continues below

Article content

  • Adjusted EBITDA up 88%: Adjusted EBITDA was $62,903 during the third quarter of 2024 compared with $33,379 during the third quarter of 2023, mainly explained by the higher revenue;
  • Net cash flows generated by operating activities were up 1,143%, totaling $53,751 in the third quarter of 2024, compared with $4,324 in the third quarter of 2023, The Company’s net free cash flow was positive for the three months ended September 30, 2024 and totaled $38,816, up from $911 in the same period of 2023, due to the timing issues of the payment of income tax of $19,766 in Colombia, lower payments to suppliers for goods and services of $17,778, due to the sale of the Gualcamayo Property which resulted in lower payments to suppliers and employees, and social security agencies, among others;
  • Dividends Paid up 43%: Dividends paid during the third quarter of 2024 were $7,476, compared with $5,241 in the same period of 2023, explained by the extraordinary dividend approved at the ordinary meeting of the General Shareholders’ Assembly in March 2024;
  • Capital investments2 up 21%: During the third quarter of 2024 capital investments of $17,578 were made into existing mines, and exploration & growth projects, compared with $14,542 in the third quarter of 2023; the increase is explained by the construction of a new tailings impoundment facility at the Hemco Property; and
  • Cash Cost & AISC: Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations in the third quarter of 2024 was $1,235 and AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations was $1,481, compared with Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations of $1,180 and AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations of $1,407 for the third quarter of 2023. The 5% increase in Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations is mainly explained by the 14% increase in the cost of sales, due to higher gold prices, partially offset by the 7% increase in ounces of gold sold. The increase in AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations is explained by the increase in the Cash Costs per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations, along with a 13% increase in sustaining capital expenditures.3

Financial Highlights for nine months ended September 30, 2024

  • Revenue increased by 23%: revenue totaled $388,408 during the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared with $316,863 in the nine months ended September 30, 2023, with sales of gold of $364,726 at an average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations of $2,293 in the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared with sales of gold of $303,117 at an average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations of $1,922 in the nine months ended September 30, 2023;

Advertisement 6

Story continues below

Article content

  • Cost of sales increased by 18%, to $258,903 in the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared with $219,225 in the nine months ended September 30, 2023; The increase in costs is primarily due to higher cost of purchasing artisanal material of $19,085 due to higher gold prices, higher labour costs of $5,537, higher services of $5,021 and higher taxes and royalties of $419;
  • Gross Profit from continuing operations increased by 33%, amounting to $129,505 in the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared with $97,638 in the nine months ended September 30, 2023; mainly due to a 23% increase in revenue, due to higher gold prices, which was partially offset by a 18% increase in cost of sales as explained above;
  • Profit for the period from continuing operations was up by 22% to $63,357 or $0.21 per share during the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared with $51,730 or $0.17 per share during the nine months ended September 30, 2023; the increase in profit is mainly explained by the increase in gross profit, partially offset by an increase in costs as mentioned earlier. Profit was negatively impacted by higher deferred taxes of $13,737 and higher current taxes of $7,436;
  • Adjusted EBITDA up 29%: Adjusted EBITDA was $153,204 during the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared with $118,782 during the nine months ended September 30, 2023 due to a 23% increase in revenue, offset by a 18% increase in cost of sales and a 14% increase in administrative expenses;
  • Loss for the period from discontinued operations decreased by 100%, to $0 during the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared with a loss of $56,281 during the nine months ended September 30, 2023, due to the sale of the Gualcamayo Property;
  • ROCE was 37% as at September 30, 2024 compared with ROCE of 26% as at September 30, 2023; the increase is mainly explained by 30% higher Adjusted EBITDA for the last 12 months, along with a 3% decrease in average capital employed, mainly explained by lower gold inventories after the sale of the Gualcamayo Property, fewer exploration and evaluation projects and lower value attributable to property, plant and equipment;
  • Net Debt was $(28,409) as at September 30, 2024, compared with $759 as at September 30, 2023; explained by 42% higher cash and cash equivalents, along with 17% lower loans and other borrowings;
  • Dividends Paid up 32%: Dividends paid were $20,188 during the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared with $15,291 in the same period of 2023, explained by an extraordinary annual dividend approved at the ordinary meeting of the General Shareholders’ Assembly in March 2024;

Advertisement 7

Story continues below

Article content

  • Net cash flows generated by operating activities were up 92% totaling $70,971 in the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared with $36,976 in the same period of 2023. The Company’s net free cash flow was positive for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 and totaled $30,101, up from $12,441 in the same period of 2023, while the sale of the Gualcamayo Property resulted in lower receipts from the sale of goods, commissions and other revenue. In total, these decreases were more than offset by the reduction in payments to suppliers and employees, and social security agencies, among others, which totaled $30,835;
  • Capital investments up 19% to $48,603: During the nine months ended September 30, 2024 capital investments of $48,603 were made into existing mines, and exploration and growth projects, compared with $40,963 in the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The increase is explained by the construction of a new tailings impoundment facility at the Hemco Property; and
  • Cash Cost & AISC: Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold in the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was $1,239 and AISC per ounce of gold sold was $1,475, compared with Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold of $1,085 and AISC per ounce of gold sold of $1,292 for the same period in 2023. The 14% increase in Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold was mainly explained by 19% higher cost of sales, due to higher gold prices, the 11% devaluation of the US dollar against the Colombian peso and 1% more ounces of gold sold. The 14% increase in AISC per ounce of gold sold is explained by the increase in Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and a 15% increase in sustaining capital expenditures.

Operational Highlights by Material Property

The following table sets forth the gold produced for the continuing and discontinued operations of the Company for the three and nine months periods ended September 30, with a discussion of the operational highlights for each of the three months ended September 30, 2024, following the table.

(All numbers in ounces unless otherwise noted)

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Change

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

Change

2024

2023

ounces

%

2024

2023

ounces

%

Nechí Alluvial Property (Colombia)

19,686

23,201

(3,515

)

(15

)

59,489

65,837

(6,348

)

(10

)

Hemco Property

10,008

5,514

4,494

82

25,547

23,252

2,295

10

Artisanal Mining

23,918

21,481

2,437

11

74,020

68,580

5,440

8

Nicaragua

33,926

26,995

6,931

26

99,567

91,832

7,735

8

Total Gold Produced from Continuing Operations

53,612

50,196

3,416

7

159,056

157,669

1,387

1

Gualcamayo Property (Argentina)

9,032

(9,032

)

(100

)

31,061

(31,061

)

(100

)

Total Gold Produced from Discontinued Operations

9,032

(9,032

)

(100

)

31,061

(31,061

)

(100

)

Total Gold Produced

53,612

59,228

(5,616

)

(9

)

159,056

188,730

(29,674

)

(16

)

Total Silver Produced

186,724

138,853

47,871

34

653,469

425,549

227,920

54

Advertisement 8

Story continues below

Article content

Operational Highlights for the three months ended September 30, 2024

  • Gold production increased by 7%: Excluding the results of the discontinued operations at the Gualcamayo Property (disposed of in 2023), 53,612 ounces of gold were produced during the third quarter of 2024, compared with 50,196 ounces in the third quarter of 2023. The increase in production is mainly a result of 26% higher production at the Hemco Property offset by 15% lower production at the Nechí Alluvial Property.
  • Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures: for the three months ended September 30, 2024, the Company incurred $2,724 in exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) expenditures, a decrease of 0.2% compared with the third quarter of 2023. Regional exploration in the Hemco Property was at similar levels in both periods. The following table summarizes E&E expenditures for the current and comparative periods. The very modest increase in exploration expenses is mainly due to regional exploration in the Hemco Property.

The following table summarizes E&E expenditures for the current and comparative periods.

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Change

2024

2023

$

%

E&E expenditures capitalized 1, 2

$

975

$

1,803

(828

)

(46

)%

E&E expenditures expensed 3

1,749

927

822

89

%

Total

$

2,724

$

2,730

(6

)

%

  1. Capitalized E&E expenditures are reflected in E&E projects in the consolidated statements of financial position.
  2. Figures in the table reflect expenditures capitalized from continuing operations. E&E expenditures capitalized from discontinued operations are nil.
  3. Expensed E&E expenditures are reported in the consolidated statement of profit or loss for the respective period under “Exploration expenses”.

GROWTH AND EXPLORATION PROJECT UPDATES

Near Mine Exploration, Hemco Property Expansion

Near mine exploration is focused on the current mining operations, the Panama Mine and the Pioneer Mine. Mineralization is related to an epithermal gold system associated with multiple quartz veins.

A total of 12,536 metres of diamond drilling in 46 holes was completed in the third quarter of 2024, achieving approximately 72% of the 2024 drilling plan. The objective of this campaign is to increase the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves at the Panama Mine and the Pioneer Mine. A total of 4,236 metres were drilled at the Panama Mine and 8,300 metres at the Pioneer Mine.

The Company is back on schedule with its original drilling plan, having compensated for previous delays through an intensified drilling effort at the La Reforma Target, a newly discovered vein at the Pioneer mine.

Advertisement 9

Story continues below

Article content

Mineros is moving forward with the preparation of an initial Mineral Resource for the La Reforma target, expected in the fourth quarter of 2024, with publication scheduled for 2025.

Porvenir Project, Nicaragua: The Porvenir Project is a pre-development-stage project located 10.5 km southwest of the existing Hemco Property facilities. Mineralization consists of a volcanic hosted gold-zinc-silver deposit with epithermal quartz veins of intermediate sulphidation.

Mineros updated the mineral resource model by incorporating all drilling data collected from the 2023 drilling campaign. The completed model is under review by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd., with ongoing updates to the geometallurgical assumptions.

The updates to the geometallurgical assumptions together with the analysis of the 2023 metallurgical testwork is underway, and the Company expects to receive the results in order to update the geometallurgical model in the fourth quarter of 2024.

In light of commodity market conditions management is proceeding logically and methodically to upgrade mineral resources and mineral reserves, and refine potential approaches to development described in the prefeasibility study completed on the Porvenir Project in 2023, with a view to maximizing the value of the asset and the projected returns. Accordingly, the Company has delayed preparation of the pre-feasibility study optimization to 2025.

Luna Roja Deposit, Nicaragua: The Luna Roja Deposit is a skarn gold system, located 24 km southeast from the existing Hemco facilities. The Company is focusing on expanding the current Mineral Resources and identifying new targets surrounding the main deposit.

The Company has finalized the model, which has been reviewed by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. Metallurgical testing samples were sent to the Hemco lab following the planned sample selection. The testing results are anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Mineros remains on track with completing the technical work and analysis necessary for an updated Mineral Resource estimate for the Luna Roja Deposit by the end of 2024, with plans for publication in 2025.

The Company plans to conduct fieldwork focused on geophysical anomalies starting in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Guillermina Target, Nicaragua: The Guillermina target is an epithermal gold-zinc-silver deposit, located 4 km west of the Pioneer deposit.

Advertisement 10

Story continues below

Article content

Delays in mobilizing contractors to site were resolved late in the second quarter. A total of 25 holes comprising 4,407 metres of diamond drilling was completed in the third quarter of 2024 which, together with the 2,091 metres drilled in the second quarter, completes the 2024 plan of 6,500 metres of drilling.

Mineros is progressing as scheduled to prepare an initial Mineral Resource estimate for the Guillermina target in the fourth quarter of 2024, expected to be published in 2025.

OUTLOOK

The following section of this news release represents forward-looking information, and readers are cautioned that actual results may vary. We refer readers to the risks and assumptions contained in “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

Gold production guidance

The following table presents the Company’s original and revised gold production guidance for 2024 and actual production for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The production guidance includes production from the Company’s Nechí Alluvial and Hemco Properties and from artisanal mining.

Actual (oz)

Guidance (oz)

Nine months ended
September 30, 2024

2024

2024 revised

Colombia (Nechí Alluvial)

59,489

86,000 – 96,000

77,000 – 85,000

Nicaragua (Hemco)

25,547

33,000 – 35,000

33,000 – 35,000

Total Company Mines

85,036

119,000 – 131,000

110,000 – 120,000

Nicaragua (Artisanal)

74,020

90,000 – 98,000

93,000 – 98,000

Total gold production (ounces)

159,056

209,000 – 229,000

203,000 – 218,000

Our Nechí Alluvial Property is behind guidance for annual production, and likely will remain short of production guidance given modestly lower grades and fewer formalized dredges working alongside Company owned dredges. Notwithstanding our goal is to have formalized dredges working along side our own, this production has lower margins. Additionally, we experienced delays in receiving and commissioning a new dredge, delaying the timing for expanding our production capacity. Accordingly, we are revising our guidance lower for Nechí Alluvial. At our Hemco Property production is tracking within the guidance range provided for both the Pioneer Mine and Panama Mine. Accordingly, we are maintaining our guidance for the Hemco Property. Regarding our production from our artisanal mining partners we are narrowing our range of guidance as production is tracking towards the top end of guidance. Given this combination of operating results for the period ended September 30, 2024, the Company refines overall production guidance for 2024 while continuing to work at improving output at the Nechí Alluvial Property.

Advertisement 11

Story continues below

Article content

Cost outlook

The following table outlines the Company’s Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and AISC per ounce of gold sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, and original and revised cost guidance for 2024. The cost guidance includes the Company’s two Material Properties, with production from artisanal mining included in Nicaragua (Hemco).

Actual Cash Cost ($/oz)

Cash Cost Guidance ($/oz)

Actual AISC ($/oz)

AISC Guidance ($/oz)

Country (principal mine)

Nine months ended September 30, 2024

2024

2024 revised

Nine months ended September 30, 2024

2024

2024 revised

Colombia (Nechí Alluvial)

$1,262

$1,090 – $1,190

$1,250 – $1,350

$1,477

$1,280 – $1,390

$1,450 – $1,550

Nicaragua (Hemco)

$1,340

$1,240 – $1,320

$1,340 – $1,420

$1,512

$1,450 – $1,520

$1,500 – $1,580

Consolidated

$1,239

$1,180 – $1,270

$1,250 – $1,330

$1,475

$1,430 – $1,530

$1,480 – $1,570

Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and AISC per ounce of gold sold outlooks were prepared assuming an average selling price of gold of $1,980/oz and inflation of 10% in Colombia and 6% in Nicaragua. Year-to-date the average realized price per ounce of gold sold has been $2,477, $497 per ounce higher than the average gold price assumed when preparing guidance. Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold has been trending at or above the high end of our annual guidance, largely due to: i) lower than anticipated production at the Nechí Alluvial Property, ii) the strength of the Colombian peso, iii) inflation, and iv) at our Hemco Property, the 25% higher average gold price has directly increased our costs by increasing the cost of material purchased from artisanal miners. Given our revised production guidance for the Nechí Alluvial Property, inflation expectations and the broad market view that gold prices may continue to rise, we have revised our guidance on cash cost per ounce of gold and AISC per ounce of gold sold at both our operations and on a consolidated basis.

CONFERENCE CALL AND WEBCAST DETAILS

The Company will host a conference call on Friday, November 15, 2024, at 10:00 am EST (10:00 AM Colombian Standard Time) to discuss the results. The conference call will be in Spanish with simultaneous translation in English.

A live webcast of the conference all will be available at:
https://app.webinar.net/39yeGDm18qo

The live webcast requires previous registration, and interested parties are advised to access the webcast approximately ten minutes prior to the start of the call. The webcast will be archived on the Company’s website at www.mineros.com.co for approximately 30 days following the call.

Advertisement 12

Story continues below

Article content

ABOUT MINEROS S.A.

Mineros is a gold mining company headquartered in Medellin, Colombia. The Company has a diversified asset base, with relatively low cost mines in Colombia and Nicaragua and a pipeline of development and exploration projects throughout the region.

The board of directors and management of Mineros have extensive experience in mining, corporate development, finance and sustainability. Mineros has a long track record of maximizing shareholder value and delivering solid annual dividends. For almost 50 years Mineros has operated with a focus on safety and sustainability at all its operations.

Mineros’ common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “MSA”, and on the Colombia Stock Exchange under the symbol “MINEROS”.

QUALIFIED PERSON

The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Luis Fernando Ferreira de Oliveira, MAusIMM CP (Geo), Mineral Resources and Reserves Manager for Mineros S.A., who is a qualified person within the meaning of NI 43-101.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This news release contains “forward looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward looking information includes statements that use forward looking terminology such as “may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, “should”, “intend”, “target”, “plan”, “expect”, “budget”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “schedule”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “continue”, “potential”, “view” or the negative or grammatical variation thereof or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. Such forward looking information includes, without limitation, statements with respect to the Company’s outlook for 2024; estimates for future mineral production and sales; the Company’s expectations, strategies and plans for the Material Properties; the Company’s planned exploration, development and production activities; statements regarding the projected exploration and development of the Company’s projects; adding or upgrading Mineral Resources and developing new mineral deposits; estimates of future capital and operating costs; the costs and timing of future exploration and development; estimates for future prices of gold and other minerals; expectations regarding the payment of dividends; and any other statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future plans, intentions, levels of activity, results, performance or achievements.

Advertisement 13

Story continues below

Article content

Forward looking information is based upon estimates and assumptions of management in light of management’s experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, as well as other factors that management believes to be relevant and reasonable in the circumstances, as of the date of this news release including, without limitation, assumptions about: favourable equity and debt capital markets; the ability to raise any necessary additional capital on reasonable terms to advance the production, development and exploration of the Company’s properties and assets; future prices of gold and other metal prices; the timing and results of exploration and drilling programs, and technical and economic studies; the accuracy of any Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates; the geology of the Material Properties being as described in the applicable technical reports; production costs; the accuracy of budgeted exploration and development costs and expenditures; the price of other commodities such as fuel; future currency exchange rates and interest rates; operating conditions being favourable such that the Company is able to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; political and regulatory stability; the receipt of governmental, regulatory and third party approvals, licenses and permits on favourable terms; obtaining required renewals for existing approvals, licenses and permits on favourable terms; requirements under applicable laws; sustained labour stability; stability in financial and capital goods markets; inflation rates; availability of labour and equipment; positive relations with local groups, including artisanal mining cooperatives in Nicaragua, and the Company’s ability to meet its obligations under its agreements with such groups; and satisfying the terms and conditions of the Company’s current loan arrangements. While the Company considers these assumptions to be reasonable, the assumptions are inherently subject to significant business, social, economic, political, regulatory, competitive and other risks and uncertainties, contingencies and other factors that could cause actual actions, events, conditions, results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those projected in the forward looking information. Many assumptions are based on factors and events that are not within the control of the Company and there is no assurance they will prove to be correct.

Advertisement 14

Story continues below

Article content

For further information of these and other risk factors, please see the ‘”Risk Factors” section of the Company’s annual information form dated March 25, 2024, available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

The Company cautions that the foregoing lists of important assumptions and factors are not exhaustive. Other events or circumstances could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated or projected and expressed in, or implied by, the forward looking information contained herein. There can be no assurance that forward looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward looking information.

Forward looking information contained herein is made as of the date of this news release and the Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, except as and to the extent required by applicable securities laws.

NON-IFRS AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES

The Company has included certain non-IFRS financial measures and non-IFRS ratios in this news release. Management believes that non-IFRS financial measures and non-IFRS ratios, when supplementing measures determined in accordance with IFRS, provide investors with an improved ability to evaluate the underlying performance of the Company. Non-IFRS financial measures and non-IFRS ratios do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures employed by other companies. This data is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. For a discussion of the use of non-IFRS financial measures and reconciliations thereof to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, see below.

EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, certain investors use earnings before interest and tax (“EBIT”), earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), and adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”), which excludes certain non-operating income and expenses, such as financial income or expenses, hedging operations, exploration expenses, impairment of assets, foreign currency exchange differences, and other expenses (principally, donations, corporate projects and taxes incurred). The Company believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results because it is consistent with the indicators management uses internally to measure the Company’s performance and is an indicator of the performance of the Company’s mining operations.

Advertisement 15

Story continues below

Article content

The following table sets out the calculation of EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to Net profit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, and 2023:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2024

2023

2024

2023

($)

($)

($)

($)

Net Profit For The Period

$

28,507

$

(32,507

)

$

63,357

$

(4,551

)

Less: Interest income

(294

)

(390

)

(1,078

)

(950

)

Add: Interest expense

2,012

1,222

6,043

3,561

Add: Current tax 1

15,231

6,982

37,525

30,089

Add/less: Deferred tax 1

1,623

(3,461

)

2,593

(11,144

)

EBIT

$

47,079

$

(28,154

)

$

108,440

$

17,005

Add: Depreciation and amortization

12,574

11,161

36,916

32,769

EBITDA

$

59,653

$

(16,993

)

$

145,356

$

49,774

Less: Other income

(294

)

(326

)

(2,392

)

(5,022

)

Add: Share of results investments in associates

26

79

Less: Finance income (excluding interest income)

(30

)

4

(83

)

(99

)

Add: Finance expense (excluding interest expense)

56

1,027

148

2,782

Add: Other expenses

1,893

2,076

5,971

5,901

Add: Exploration expenses

1,749

927

4,282

3,536

Less: Foreign exchange differences

(150

)

873

(157

)

5,629

Add: Loss for the period from discontinued operations 2

45,791

56,281

Adjusted EBITDA3

$

62,903

$

33,379

$

153,204

$

118,782

  1. For additional information regarding taxes, see Note 12 of our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023
  2. Composition of Adjusted EBITDA was revised in the third quarter of 2023 to include loss for the year from discontinued operations.
  3. The reconciliation above does not include adjustments for (impairment) reversal of assets, because there would be a nil adjustment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023.

Cash Cost

The objective of Cash Cost is to provide stakeholders with a key indicator that reflects as close as possible the direct cost of producing and selling an ounce of gold.

The Company reports Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold which is calculated by deducting revenue from silver sales, depreciation and amortization, environmental rehabilitation provisions and including cash used for retirement obligations and environmental and rehabilitation and sales of electric energy. This total is divided by the number of gold ounces sold. Cash Cost includes mining, milling, mine site security, royalties, and mine site administration costs, and excludes non-cash operating expenses. Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold is a non-IFRS financial measure used to monitor the performance of our gold mining operations and their ability to generate profit, and is consistent with the guidance methodology set out by the World Gold Council.

Advertisement 16

Story continues below

Article content

The following table provides a reconciliation of Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold on a by-product basis to cost of sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, and 2023:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2024

2023

2024

2023

Cost of sales

$

86,234

$

75,658

$

258,903

$

219,225

Less: Cost of sales of non-mining operations1

(407

)

(195

)

(827

)

(494

)

Less: Depreciation and amortization

(12,254

)

(10,943

)

(35,961

)

(31,780

)

Less: Sales of silver

(5,552

)

(3,199

)

(17,719

)

(9,715

)

Less: Sales of electric energy2

(2,163

)

(1,119

)

(5,311

)

(3,275

)

Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision2

(529

)

(973

)

(4,064

)

(2,942

)

Add: Use of environmental and rehabilitation liabilities2

434

811

Add: Use of Retirement obligations2

471

1,203

Cash Cost from continuing operations2

$

66,234

$

59,229

$

197,035

$

171,019

Gold sold (oz) from continuing operations

53,612

50,196

159,056

157,669

Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz)

$

1,235

$

1,180

$

1,239

$

1,085

Cash Cost from discontinued operations

29,316

66,262

Gold sold (oz) from discontinued operations

9,947

31,737

Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold from discontinued operations ($/oz)

$

$

2,947

$

$

2,088

Cash Cost

$

66,234

$

88,545

$

197,035

$

237,281

Gold sold (oz)

53,612

60,143

159,056

189,406

Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,235

$

1,472

$

1,239

$

1,253

  1. Refers to cost of sales incurred in the Company’s “Others” segment. See Note 7 of our unaudited condensed interim financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023. The majority of this amount relates to the cost of sales of latex.
  2. The composition of Cash Cost from continuing operations was revised in the fourth quarter of 2023 to adjust for asset retirement obligations and environmental rehabilitation provisions in connection with the sale of the Gualcamayo Property. It was further revised in the second quarter of 2024 to exclude sales of electric energy to better reflect the costs to produce an ounce of gold.

All-in Sustaining Costs

The objective of AISC is to provide stakeholders with a key indicator that reflects as close as possible the full cost of producing and selling an ounce of gold. AISC per ounce of gold sold is a non-IFRS ratio that is intended to provide investors with transparency regarding the total costs of producing one ounce of gold in the relevant period.

Advertisement 17

Story continues below

Article content

The Company reports AISC per ounce of gold sold on a by-product basis. The methodology for calculating AISC per ounce of gold sold is set out below and is consistent with the guidance methodology set out by the World Gold Council. The World Gold Council definition of AISC seeks to extend the definition of total Cash Cost by deducting cost of sales of non-mining operations and adding administrative expenses, sustaining exploration, sustaining leases and leaseback and sustaining capital expenditures. Non-sustaining costs are primarily those related to new operations and major projects at existing operations that are expected to materially benefit the current operation. The determination of classification of sustaining versus non-sustaining requires judgment by management. AISC excludes current and deferred income tax payments, finance expenses and other expenses. Consequently, these measures are not representative of all the Company’s cash expenditures. In addition, the calculation of AISC does not include depreciation and amortization cost or expense as it does not reflect the impact of expenditures incurred in prior periods. Therefore, it is not indicative of the Company’s overall profitability. Other companies may quantify these measures differently because of different underlying principles and policies applied. Differences may also occur due to different definitions of sustaining versus non-sustaining.

The following table provides a reconciliation of AISC per ounce of gold sold to cost of sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, and 2023:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2024

2023

2024

2023

Cost of sales

$

86,234

$

75,658

$

258,903

$

219,225

Less: Cost of sales of non-mining operations 1

(407

)

(195

)

(827

)

(494

)

Less: Depreciation and amortization

(12,254

)

(10,943

)

(35,961

)

(31,780

)

Less: Sales of silver

(5,552

)

(3,199

)

(17,719

)

(9,715

)

Less: Sales of electric energy

(2,163

)

(1,119

)

(5,311

)

(3,275

)

Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision2

(529

)

(973

)

(4,064

)

(2,942

)

Add: Use of environmental and rehabilitation liabilities2

434

811

Add: Use of Retirement obligations2

471

1,203

Add: Administrative expenses

4,313

3,495

13,217

11,625

Less: Depreciation and amortization of administrative expenses 2

(320

)

(218

)

(955

)

(989

)

Add: Sustaining leases and leaseback 3

2,544

2,241

7,383

5,925

Add: Sustaining exploration 4

42

256

160

548

Add: Sustaining capital expenditures 5

6,592

5,646

17,812

15,556

AISC from continuing operations

$

79,405

$

70,649

$

234,652

$

203,684

Gold sold (oz) from continued operations

53,612

50,196

159,056

157,669

AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz)

$

1,481

$

1,407

$

1,475

$

1,292

AISC from discontinued operations

31,153

76,911

Gold sold (oz) from discontinued operations

9,947

31,737

AISC per ounce of gold sold from discontinued operations ($/oz)

3,132

2,423

AISC

$

79,405

$

101,802

$

234,652

$

280,595

Gold sold (oz)

53,612

60,143

159,056

189,406

AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,481

$

1,693

$

1,475

$

1,481

Advertisement 18

Story continues below

Article content

  1. Cost of sales of non-mining operations is the cost of sales excluding cost incurred by non-mining operations and the majority of this cost comprises cost of sales of latex.
  2. Depreciation and amortization of administrative expenses is included in the administrative expenses line on the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements and is mainly related to depreciation for corporate office spaces and local administrative buildings at the Hemco Property.
  3. Represents most lease payments as reported in the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of cash flows and is made up of the principal of such cash payments, less non-sustaining lease payments. Lease payments for new development projects and capacity projects are classified as non-sustaining.
  4. Sustaining exploration: Exploration expenses and exploration and evaluation projects as reported in the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements, less non-sustaining exploration. Exploration expenditures are classified as either sustaining or non-sustaining based on a determination of the type and location of the exploration expenditure. Exploration expenditures within the footprint of operating mines are considered costs required to sustain current operations and so are included in sustaining costs. Exploration expenditures focused on new ore bodies near existing mines (i.e. brownfield), new exploration projects (i.e. greenfield) or for other generative exploration activity not linked to existing mining operations are classified as non- sustaining.
  5. Sustaining capital expenditures: Represents the capital expenditures at existing operations including, periodic capitalized stripping and underground mine development costs, ongoing replacement of mine equipment and overhaul of existing equipment, and is calculated as total additions to property, plant and equipment (as reported on the consolidated statements of cash flows), less non-sustaining capital. Non-sustaining capital represents capital expenditures for major projects, including projects at existing operations that are expected to materially benefit the operation and provide a level of growth, as well as enhancement capital for significant infrastructure improvements at existing operations. Non-sustaining capital expenditures during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, are primarily related to major projects at the Hemco Property and the Nechí Alluvial Property. The sum of sustaining capital expenditures and non-sustaining capital expenditures is reported as the total of additions of property plant and equipment in the unaudited condensed interim financial statements

Advertisement 19

Story continues below

Article content

Cash Cost and All-in Sustaining Costs by Operating Segment

The following tables provide a reconciliation of Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold and AISC per ounce of gold sold by operating segment14 to cost of sales, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, and 2023:

Three months ended September 30, 2024

Nechi Alluvial

Hemco

Cost of sales

$

32,833

$

57,027

Less: Depreciation and amortization

(4,246

)

(7,968

)

Less: Sales of silver

(55

)

(5,497

)

Less: Sales of electric energy

(2,163

)

Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision

(529

)

Add: Use of environmental and rehabilitation liabilities2

434

Add: Use of Retirement obligations2

471

Cash Cost

$

26,274

$

44,033

AISC Adjustments

Less: Depreciation and amortization of administrative expenses

(4

)

(18

)

Add: Administrative expenses

703

847

Add: Sustaining leases and Leaseback

659

1,885

Add: Sustaining exploration

42

Add: Sustaining capital expenditure

3,131

3,461

AISC

$

30,805

$

50,208

Gold sold (oz)

19,686

33,926

Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,335

$

1,298

AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,565

$

1,480

Three months ended September 30, 2023

Nechi Alluvial

Hemco

Gualcamayo (Discontinued operation)1

Cost of sales

$

29,686

$

49,361

$

32,535

Less: Depreciation and amortization

(3,651

)

(7,256

)

(3,147

)

Less: Sales of silver

(41

)

(3,158

)

(72

)

Less: Sales of electric energy

(1,119

)

Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision

(973

)

Cash Cost

$

23,902

$

38,947

$

29,316

AISC Adjustments

Less: Depreciation and amortization administrative expenses

(4

)

(11

)

Add: Administrative expenses

621

774

418

Add: Sustaining leases and Leaseback

551

1,690

1,419

Add: Sustaining exploration

256

Add: Sustaining capital expenditure

2,632

3,014

AISC

$

27,958

$

44,414

$

31,153

Gold sold (oz)

23,201

26,995

9,947

Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,030

$

1,443

$

2,947

AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,205

$

1,645

$

3,132

  1. The Gualcamayo Property was sold as part of the disposition of MASA. Results in the table in the column titled Gualcamayo (Discontinued operation) reflect results from January 1, 2023 to September 21, 2023 and solely pertain to the discontinued operation.

Nine months ended September 30, 2024

Nechi Alluvial

Hemco

Cost of sales

$

96,532

$

172,891

Less: Depreciation and amortization

(12,762

)

(23,075

)

Less: Sales of silver

(151

)

(17,568

)

Less: Sales of electric energy

(5,311

)

Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision

(4,064

)

Add: Use of environmental and rehabilitation liabilities2

811

Add: Use of Retirement obligations2

1,203

Cash Cost

$

75,055

$

133,451

AISC Adjustments

Less: Depreciation and amortization of administrative expenses

(11

)

(32

)

Add: Administrative expenses

2,142

2,435

Add: Sustaining leases and Leaseback

2,060

5,323

Add: Sustaining exploration

160

Add: Sustaining capital expenditure

8,468

9,344

AISC

$

87,874

$

150,521

Gold sold (oz)

59,489

99,567

Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,262

$

1,340

AISC per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,477

$

1,512

Advertisement 20

Story continues below

Article content

Nine months ended September 30, 2023

Nechi Alluvial

Hemco

Gualcamayo (Discontinued operation)1

Cost of sales

$

83,074

$

146,653

$

74,589

Less: Depreciation and amortization

(10,864

)

(20,842

)

(8,110

)

Less: Sales of silver

(135

)

(9,580

)

(217

)

Less: Sales of electric energy

(3,275

)

Less: Environmental rehabilitation provision

(2,942

)

Cash Cost

$

65,858

$

116,231

$

66,262

AISC Adjustments

Less: Depreciation and amortization of administrative expenses

(11

)

(36

)

Add: Administrative expenses

1,650

2,277

1,586

Add: Sustaining leases and Leaseback

1,457

4,468

4,556

Add: Sustaining exploration

504

44

Add: Sustaining capital expenditure

9,289

6,267

4,507

AISC

$

78,747

$

129,251

$

76,911

Gold sold (oz)

65,837

91,832

31,737

Cash Cost per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,000

$

1,266

$

2,088

AISC costs per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

1,196

$

1,407

$

2,423

  1. The Gualcamayo Property was sold as part of the disposition of MASA. Results in the table in the column titled Gualcamayo (Discontinued operation) reflect results from January 1, 2023 to September 21, 2023 and solely pertain to the discontinued operation.

Net Free Cash Flow

The Company uses the financial measure “net free cash flow”, which is a non-IFRS financial measure, to supplement information regarding cash flows generated by operating activities. The Company believes that in addition to IFRS financial measures, certain investors and analysts use this information to evaluate the Company’s performance with respect to its operating cash flow capacity to meet recurring outflows of cash.

Net free cash flow is calculated as cash flows generated by operating activities less non-discretionary sustaining capital expenditures and interest and dividends paid related to the relevant period. As the Gualcamayo Property was sold in September 2023, amounts related to the metrics shown in the following table have been calculated to reflect only the continuing operations of the Company.

The following table sets out the calculation of the Company’s net free cash flow to net cash flows generated by

operating activities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, and 2023:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2024

2023

2024

2023

Net cash flows generated by operating activities

$

53,751

$

4,324

$

70,971

$

36,976

Non-discretionary items:

Sustaining capital expenditures (excluding Gualcamayo)

(6,592

)

(5,646

)

(17,812

)

(15,556

)

Interest paid

(867

)

(2,707

)

(2,870

)

(6,451

)

Dividends paid

(7,476

)

(5,241

)

(20,188

)

(15,291

)

Net cash flows used in (generated from) discontinued operations 1

10,181

12,763

Net free cash flow

$

38,816

$

911

$

30,101

$

12,441

Advertisement 21

Story continues below

Article content

  1. Composition of net free cash flow has been revised to exclude net cash flows used in (generated from) discontinued operations.

Return on Capital Employed (“ROCE”)

The Company uses ROCE as a measure of long-term operating performance to measure how effectively management utilizes the capital it is provided. This non-IFRS ratio is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The calculation of ROCE, expressed as a percentage, is Adjusted EBIT (calculated in the manner set out in the table below) divided by the average of the opening and closing capital employed for the 12 months preceding the period end. Capital employed for a period is calculated as total assets at the beginning of that period less total current liabilities.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024

2024

2023

Adjusted EBITDA (last 12 months)

$

206,568

$

158,899

Less: Depreciation and amortization (last 12 months)

(49,246

)

(43,695

)

Adjusted EBIT (A)

$

157,322

$

115,204

Total assets at the beginning of the period

493,757

569,543

Less: Total current liabilities at the beginning of the period

(84,765

)

(134,581

)

Opening Capital Employed (B)

$

408,992

$

434,962

Total assets at the end of the period

563,093

576,771

Less: Current liabilities at the end of the period

(119,054

)

(134,581

)

Closing Capital employed (C)

$

444,039

$

442,190

Average Capital employed (D)= (B) + (C) /2

$

426,516

$

438,576

ROCE (A/D)

37

%

26

%

Net Debt

Net Debt is a non-IFRS financial measure that provides insight regarding the liquidity position of the Company. The calculation of net debt shown below is calculated as nominal undiscounted debt including leases, less cash and cash equivalents. The following sets out the calculation of Net Debt as at September 30, 2024 and 2023.

As at September 30,

2024

2023

Loans and other borrowings

$

28,718

$

33,692

Less: Cash and cash equivalents

(57,127

)

(32,933

)

Net Debt

$

(28,409

)

$

759

Average Realized Price

The Company uses “average realized price per ounce of gold sold” and “average realized price per ounce of silver sold”, which are non-IFRS financial measures. Average realized metal price represents the revenue from the sale of the underlying metal as per the statement of operations, adjusted to reflect the effect of trading at the holding company level (parent company) on the sales of gold purchased from subsidiaries. Average realized prices are calculated as the revenue related to gold and silver sales divided by the number of ounces of metal sold. The following table sets out the reconciliation of average realized metal prices to sales of gold and sales of silver for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023:

Advertisement 22

Story continues below

Article content

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2024

2023

2024

2023

Sales of gold from continuing operations

$

132,788

$

96,450

$

364,726

$

303,117

Gold sold from continuing operations (oz)

53,612

50,196

159,056

157,669

Average realized price per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations ($/oz)

$

2,477

$

1,921

$

2,293

$

1,922

Sales of gold from discontinued operations

$

$

19,178

$

$

61,516

Gold sold from discontinued operations (oz)

9,947

31,737

Average realized price per ounce of gold sold from discontinued operations ($/oz)

$

$

1,928

$

$

1,938

Average realized price per ounce of gold sold ($/oz)

$

2,477

$

1,923

$

2,293

$

1,925

Sales of silver from continuing operations

$

5,552

$

3,199

$

17,719

$

9,787

Silver sold from continuing operations (oz)

186,724

135,776

653,469

416,329

Average realized price per ounce of silver sold from continuing operations ($/oz)

$

30

$

24

$

27

$

24

Sales of silver from discontinued operations

$

$

72

$

$

217

Silver sold from discontinued operations (oz)

3,077

9,220

Average realized price per ounce of silver sold from discontinued operations ($/oz)

$

$

23

$

$

24

Average realized price per ounce of silver sold ($/oz)

$

30

$

24

$

27

$

24

____________________
1 Average realized price per ounce of gold sold, Cash Cost per ounce of gold from continuing operations, AISC per ounce of gold sold from continuing operations, and net free cash flow are non-IFRS financial measures, and ROCE is a non-IFRS ratio, with no standardized meaning under IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and detailed reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, see “Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures”.
2Capital investments refers to additions to exploration, property, plant and equipment, and intangibles (which includes asset retirement obligation amounts and leases) for the Nechí Alluvial Property, the Hemco Property, and the La Pepa Project segments. It excludes additions to property, plant and equipment, exploration or intangibles of Mineros and other segments. For additional information as additions to exploration, property, plant and equipment, and intangibles, see Note 7 of our unaudited condensed interim financial statements for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2024.
3 For information regarding the composition of sustaining capital expenditures, see Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures – All-In Sustaining Costs in this news release.
4 For additional information regarding segments (Material Properties), see Note 7 of our unaudited condensed interim financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, and 2023.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241113032749/en/

logo

Contacts

For further information, please contact:
Ann Wilkinson
Vice President, Investor Relations
+1 416-357-5511
relacion.inversionistas@mineros.com.co
Investor.relations@mineros.com.co

Article content

Comments

Join the Conversation

Featured Local Savings

Maple Leaf Foods earns $17.7M in Q3, sales rise as it works to spin off pork business

Maple Leaf Foods Inc. continued to navigate weaker consumer demand in the third quarter as it looked ahead to the spinoff of its pork business in 2025.

“This environment has a particularly significant impact on a premium portfolio like ours and I want you to know that we are not sitting still waiting for the macro environment to recover on its own,” said CEO Curtis Frank on a call with analysts.

Frank said the company is working to adapt its strategies to consumer demand. As inflation has stabilized and interest rates decline, he said pressure on consumers is expected to ease.

Maple Leaf reported a third-quarter profit of $17.7 million compared with a loss of $4.3 million in the same quarter last year.

The company says the profit amounted to 14 cents per share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with a loss of four cents per share a year earlier. Sales for the quarter totalled $1.26 billion, up from $1.24 billion a year ago.

“At a strategic level … we’re certainly seeing the transitory impacts of an inflation-stressed consumer environment play through our business,” Frank said.

“We are seeing more trade-down than we would like. And we are making more investments to grow our volume and protect our market share than we would like in the moment. But again, we believe that those impacts will prove to be transitory as they have been over the course of history.”

Financial results are improving in the segment as feed costs have stabilized, said Dennis Organ, president, pork complex.

Maple Leaf, which is working to spin off its pork business into a new, publicly traded company to be called Canada Packers Inc. and led by Organ, also said it has identified a way to implement the plan through a tax-free “butterfly reorganization.”

Frank said Wednesday that the new structure will see Maple Leaf retain slightly lower ownership than previously intended.

The company said it continues to expect to complete the transaction next year. However, the spinoff under the new structure is subject to an advance tax ruling from the Canada Revenue Agency and will take longer than first anticipated.

Maple Leaf announced the spinoff in July with a plan to become a more focused consumer packaged goods company, including its Maple Leaf and Schneiders brands.

“The prospect of executing the transaction as a tax-free spin-off is a positive development as we continue to advance our strategy to unlock value and unleash the potential of these two unique and distinct businesses,” Frank said in the news release.

He also said that Maple Leaf is set on delivering profitability for its plant protein business in mid-2025.

“This includes the recent completion of a procurement project aimed at leveraging our purchasing scale,” he said.

On an adjusted basis, Maple Leaf says it earned 18 cents per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of 13 cents per share in the same quarter last year.

The results were largely in line with expectations, said RBC analyst Irene Nattel in a note.

Maple Leaf shares were down 4.5 per cent in midday trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange at $21.49.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 13, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:MFI)

Rosa Saba, The Canadian Press

South Pacific Metals Taps K92 Exploration Veteran To Lead Anga And Osena Project Drilling In PNG’s Kainantu Gold District

(MENAFN– Newsfile Corp)
Highlights:

  • Dean Williamson Joins to Execute Drill Program Mandate – Former K92 exploration operator/manager with extensive experience and knowledge of Kainantu area mineralization and operations;

  • Irinke Prospect Assays – Surface program results have defined a 2 km-wide mineralized NE trending corridor at SW Anga Project, with orientation and strike continuations comparable to K92’s Arakompa Discovery and lode-gold drill program, less than 3 km away;

  • Anga and Osena Project Drill Planning Nearing Completion – Additional exploration programs set to kick off at both Anga and Osena / K92 border areas, with a new Anga anomaly discovery at Binano less than 1,500 metres from K92 Mining’s Plant Site, an expanded Irinke Prospect, and the recently identified Ontenu Northeast lode-gold target at Osena; and

  • Positioned for Discovery Success – Leveraging a shared 45 km mineralized corridor that runs through both Anga and Osena Projects, the close proximity to K92’s active exploration and infrastructure positions projects for near-term discovery and development scenarios.

Vancouver, British Columbia–(Newsfile Corp. – November 13, 2024) – South Pacific Metals Corp. (TSXV: SPMC) (OTCQB: SPMEF) (FSE: 6J00) (” SPMC ” or the ” Company “) is pleased to announce Dean Williamson has joined the Company as Exploration Manager in Papua New Guinea. Mr. Williamson brings extensive experience gained from his +30 year exploration career, which most recently includes a five-year tenure at K92 Mining, where he led critical exploration initiatives that delivered significant gold-copper discoveries. His geological and operational expertise will play a key role in advancing forthcoming Anga and Osena Project drill programs within the Kainantu Gold District.

Previously, Mr. Williamson was principal leader of the K92 Mining exploration team that discovered the Blue Lake Copper-Gold Porphyry and yielded a major maiden inferred resource estimate, as well as acting as a key leader in managing the infill and extensional drilling of the Kora and Judd lodes. With a demonstrated ability to drive results in complex terrains, Mr. Williamson’s leadership and desire to be in the field will accelerate exploration on SPMC’s adjacent properties.

The Anga and Osena Projects hold substantial promise as K92-adjacent properties with geology and mineralization similar to the prolific Kainantu deposits. Extensive geological work by the Company has indicated potential for lode-gold and large-scale copper-gold porphyry, vein and skarn systems at both Anga and Osena. Recent surface sampling programs have already identified high-priority targets, setting the stage for targeted drilling efforts under Williamson’s direction.

Michael Murphy, Executive Chair of South Pacific Metals, commented, “Dean Williamson’s track record in achieving high-impact discoveries at K92 Mining aligns perfectly with our mission to unlock district-scale potential in Papua New Guinea. His insights and proven exploration acumen will be instrumental as we advance Anga and Osena, two of our most prospective properties adjacent to K92’s operations.”

K92 is targeting a maiden mineral resource estimate for Arakompa by Q1 2025, and reports mineralization is open in both directions along strike, at depth and only approximately 40% of the +1.7 km mineralized corridor strike length has been drill tested to date.

Anga Gold-Copper Project Update

The Company is pleased to announce promising results of its preliminary surface sampling program conducted in July-August 2024 at its Anga Gold-Copper Project, located in the gold-copper-producing Kainantu District (see news releases dated July 25, 2024 and September 5, 2024). The exploration program at the Irinke Prospect was designed to target lode-gold and base-metal rich mineralization known to exist on the adjacent property, only 3 km to the southwest at the Arakompa lode-gold drill program and nearby Kainantu Gold Mine.

Recent Project Highlights:

  • Multiple occurrences of gold mineralized veins and structurally hosted breccias, and Au-Be-Ti-Cu anomalous soils has helped to define a 2 km-wide mineralized NE trending corridor 3 km along strike from Arakompa;

  • Recent surface sampling at Irinke returned notable gold assays in rock chip samples, including 3.28 g/t Au, and 1,292ppm Cu;

  • New and expanded gold in soil anomalies – coincident Au-Be-Ti-Cu (important district pathfinders), with an expanded anomaly at Irinke now over 1000 x 300 meters and a new anomaly at Binano over 700 x 300 metres;

  • Surface results to date show similar style host rocks, alteration and metal associations to that of Arakompa, in particular, the recently identified 17 x 2 metre shear zone; and

  • The total anomalous Au-Cu in soil and rock footprint at Anga is 4 by 3 km – suggesting a possible large sub-surface mineralized system present at Anga.

The SW Anga Project and new anomalies are located within 1.5 km of K92 Mining’s processing plant (Figure 1). The project area consists of meta-sediments (phyllites) and porphyry intrusions, both of which are coincident and proximal to mineralization on the adjacent Kainantu Mine Area. The structures are generally oriented N-S to NNE-SSW and provide strike continuations to the impressive Arakompa discovery located less than 3 kilometres along strike from the project area. As previously reported (see news release dated March 10, 2022) a Mobile MT geophysical survey presents conductivity anomalies also comparable to those anomalies the Kainantu deposits currently being mined.

2024 Irinke Expanded Exploration Program

The ongoing 2024 Irinke Exploration Program comprised comprehensive surface sampling and structural and geological mapping program on the western-most portion of the Project (refer to Figure 2). The program is designed to follow up on positive preliminary surface sampling results from previous work in 2022 (under previous management as Kainantu Resources Ltd., see news release dated December 15, 2022), notably, a high-grade gold-carbonate base-metal vein was sampled that returned 2.28 g/t Au, 9.4 g/t Ag, 418ppm Pb and 1254 ppm Zn.

New results include an expanded gold anomaly which is coincident with elevated pathfinders of copper, bismuth and tellurium. The pathfinder suite, gold rock chips up to 3.28 g/t Au, and the dominant NNE-SSW trend orientation set this area as priority for follow up work (refer Figure 2).

Binano Prospect – New Anomaly Discovered

Approximately 1.5 km to the east of Irinke is the Binano area (Figure 2). Previously a rock float sample returned 0.27% Cu from a sample described as a quartz veined intrusive with disseminated pyrite-chalcopyrite. Follow up work included a soil sampling grid which has now identified a coincident gold and pathfinder anomaly over 700 x 300 metres. Similarly to Irinke, Binano contains structural fabrics of a similar orientation to Arakompa. The area between Irinke and Binano is through a valley floor with minimal outcrop. It is possible these prospects connect or there are further as yet undiscovered anomalies and targets in areas under shallow cover.


South Pacific Metals Taps K92 Exploration Veteran To Lead Anga And Osena Project Drilling In PNG

Figure 1: Anga Project Au in rock chip and Bi in soils results and recently updated mineralization halo of the Arakompa vein system only 3 km to the southwest.* The northeast striking zone of elevated Bi in soils, which is an important element associated with gold mineralization, is 700 metres in length.*

*Readers are cautioned that mineral deposits on adjacent properties are not indicative of mineral deposits on the Company’s properties.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:


South Pacific Metals Taps K92 Exploration Veteran To Lead Anga And Osena Project Drilling In PNG

Figure 2: Au-Te-Cu-Bi soil results zoomed into the SW Anga region showing anomalous pathfinder suite at the Irinke and Binano Creek regions.
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:

Next Steps

The Company is planning further surface exploration work at Anga, including more detailed soil grid sampling in the Irinke area to fill in regions of encouraging results from the recent coarse (50 m spaced) sampling. Locations for drill placement will also be assessed. Additionally, a preliminary ridge and spur and stream sampling program is being designed to explore other exciting targets at Anga that have not yet been ground truthed.

Stock Options Grant

SPMC also announces that it has granted 75,000 incentive stock options (the “Options”) at an exercise price of $0.58 per share to Mr. Williamson. The Options will vest in stages, with 38,000 vesting upon completion of a drill program and the remainder vesting after 12 months following the drill program completion date.

About the Anga Project

The Anga Gold-Copper Project comprises 461 km2 of 100%-owned exploration licenses in the highly gold-copper mineralized Kainantu Gold District. The project is located immediately northeast of, and adjacent to, K92’s Kainantu Gold Mine Project (see Figure 3), and its southwestern project boundary is only 3 km from where K92 is currently drilling on the Arakompa lode-gold vein system, where multiple wide and high-grade gold zones have been intercepted. Access to the Anga Project is via the Ramu-Markham highway to the northeast.

Across the broader, 60 km by 40 km sized Kainantu Gold District there are multiple gold and copper occurrences, prospects, and targets. Mineralization is interpreted to be associated with mid to late-Miocene intrusive rock, the NNE oriented Kainantu Transfer Structural Zone and NNW oriented arc-parallel structures, all of which are present at Anga. Since 2020, the Company has been actively engaged with local communities on the Project to ensure consent is gained and maintained to undertake field work programs.


South Pacific Metals Taps K92 Exploration Veteran To Lead Anga And Osena Project Drilling In PNG


Figure 3: Regional location map*

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:

QA/QC

Soil samples were collected on a nominal grid pattern of 50m x 100m, where access allowed, and by field teams using sieved B-Horizon soils. All samples were assayed by Intertek Laboratory in Lae, Papua New Guinea using Aqua Regia analysis (code AR01/MS OES) with detection limits 0.1 ppb Au, 0.02 ppm Bi, 0.05 ppm Cu and 0.02 ppm Te.

Rock samples were collected selectively from natural outcrop, or small hand-dug excavations. Samples were assayed by Intertek Laboratory in Lae, Papua New Guinea using Fire Assay (code FA25) for gold with a detection limit of 0.01 ppm; and 4-acid ICP analysis for multi-element including copper with a detection limit of 1 ppm. Standards (certified reference material), duplicates and blanks are inserted into the sample submission to monitor laboratory performance.

Recently received rock sample results > 0.05ppm Au (Coordinates, WGS84 Zone 55).

The scientific and technical information disclosed in this release has been reviewed and approved by Darren Holden, BSc.(Hons), Ph.D., FAusIMM, a “Qualified Person” as defined under the Canadian Institute of Mining National Instrument 43-101, 2014 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Dr. Holden is a Technical Advisor to the Company.

*Readers are cautioned that mineral deposits on adjacent properties are not indicative of mineral deposits on the Company’s properties.

About South Pacific Metals Corp.

South Pacific Metals Corp is an emerging gold-copper exploration company operating in the heart of Papua New Guinea’s proven gold and copper production corridors. With an expansive 3,100 km2 land package and four transformative gold-copper projects contiguous with major producers K92 Mining, PanAust and neighbouring Barrick/Zijin, new leadership and experienced in-country teams are prioritizing thoughtful and rigorous technical programs focused on boots-on-the-ground exploration to prioritize discovery across its portfolio projects: Anga, Osena, Kili Teke and May River.

Immediately flanking K92’s active drilling and gold producing operations to the northeast and southwest, SPMC’s Anga and Osena Projects are located within the high-grade Kainantu Gold District – each having the potential to host similar-style lode-gold and porphyry copper-gold mineralization as that present within K92’s tenements. Kili Teke is an advanced exploration project situated only 40 km from the world-class Porgera Gold Mine and hosts an existing Inferred Mineral Resource with multiple opportunities for expansion and further discovery. The May River Project is located adjacent to the world-renowned Frieda River copper-gold project, with historical drilling indicating potential for a significant, untapped-gold mineralized system. SPMC common shares are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV: SPMC), the OTCQB Marketplace (OTCQB: SPMEF) and Frankfurt Stock Exchange (FSE: 6J00).

To succeed in this business, ‘you need high performance ideas’: Helen Kearns

With a background as a business journalist and a pioneer in capital markets, Helen Kearns knows the importance of identifying powerful stories in the investment world.

Story continues below

Today she is the CEO of Bell Kearns & Associates Ltd. in Toronto, a family office that builds deep relationships with money managers while making portfolios understandable to its ultra-high-net-worth clients.

Kearns began as a freelance business reporter in Montreal, which introduced her to the quarterly reports of companies based there. She joined the Montreal Gazette to cover the flight of capital from Quebec following the election of the Parti Québécois, then was hired by Business Week magazine in Toronto to report on Canada.

She moved to the investment business in 1980 when she was recruited by Richardson Securities as just the second woman in Canada on an institutional desk in the industry. She advanced to head of institutional sales and trading for the company, which became Richardson Greenshields of Canada Ltd., the first woman in North America in that role.

She founded her own institutional investment firm, Kearns Capital Ltd., served three terms as a governor of the Toronto Stock Exchange and became the first president of Nasdaq Canada.

In 2005, Kearns became a member of the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan board and joined Robert Bell in his company, RS Bell & Associates Ltd. Within a year she became an equity owner and president of the firm, which was renamed Bell Kearns & Associates in 2009.

Today the firm has 14 staff, including two artificial intelligence experts who have joined it under a program of the Vector Institute, which works to accelerate the use of AI in business.

Bell Kearns has 45 clients, 80 per cent of them families and the rest foundations and investment corporations, with some $2.5 billion in assets under management. Robert Bell remains as chairman while daughter Susan Bell serves as president.

Kearns spoke with Canadian Family Offices about the influence of her early career, how the company applies a pension playbook to investing and the power of high-performance thinking.

How did your background in journalism shape what you do today?

I was really good at identifying powerful ideas and stories in the investment world. At Business Week, you had to have high-performance ideas to get in the magazine, and you need high-performance ideas if you’re going to keep, win and build client trust and relationships in the investment business.

How did your transition to the investing business go at Richardson?

On an institutional sales desk at an integrated brokerage firm, the job is to sell great ideas to the large financial institutions, pension plans and money managers. But I did not know the language of the investment business at all.

Were there other challenges?

Being the only woman, it was a very tough start. There was lots of bias.

After the first year, my boss called all the guys on the sales desk into a meeting room to vote on whether or not to let Helen into the bonus pool. And the vote was no. I’m the only person I know who spent a year in the wading pool for a bonus!

How did you get past that?

When someone tells you you can’t do something, it starts a real fire inside. I had a mentor named Jalynn Bennett who said, ‘Helen, I want you to call me every day and give me your latest research and what is going to be moving markets.’ That helped me grow. From there I became a top gun in sales for the next 16 years.

After that you became the first woman to start an institutional brokerage firm in Canada and then head of Nasdaq Canada. What was next?

I got two phone calls in June of 2005, one from the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan to go on the board and one from Rob Bell. And I took both calls.

How did the Ontario Teachers’ position influence you?

Going on the Ontario Teachers’ board was a masterclass in long-term investing and the innovative platforms it was bringing into the mix. Neil Petroff was CIO, and as he said, ‘We’re going to use all the tools in the toolbox, which is all the asset classes, to drive long-term risk-adjusted returns.’

And what about Rob Bell?

Rob had built BellCharts, a successful mutual fund research firm he sold to Morningstar, and he started our firm in 1991. I had been researching the family office business, and I knew this was a very disparate business, but interesting. I could take 25 years of investing experience and bring it to clients.

Story continues below

What is the raison d’être of Bell Kearns?

Bringing high-performance thinking. We do not get paid by any managers; we are truly independent. If you scratch below the surface, there’s a lot of ties to fee-based compensation in the family-office industry. Our only source of revenue is our fees from our clients.

It’s incredibly important, because it perfectly aligns you with your client. If you have a fee-based link to some manager, it’s going to cause you to think twice about whether or not that manager should be fired, because you’ve got this source of extra revenue.

We deliver a framework for making informed decisions to create a sustainable, long-term portfolio. I think of this framework as a house. The foundation layer is risk appetite. And if there’s more than one person around the table, we make sure that we hear all the voices.

Then we go to the second level in the house and we do portfolio construction. What asset classes, what mix do we need to drive the risk-adjusted returns that this client is looking for?

Was your experience at Ontario Teachers’ important in that?

Yes. That’s really one of the things that I brought to the company, leaning into pension thinking. I just wrote a piece for our quarterly letter on why we admire Canadian pension funds. Number one is they set in place an outstanding governance system to incentivize long-term thinking.

Following a pension playbook helps an investor do that?

We want our clients to understand the structure of their portfolios and whether they are achieving the long-term, risk-adjusted rate-of-return goals that will meet their needs. Because we’ve been doing this for 33 years, we understand cycles. We know there’s going to be down cycles. So one of our biggest messages is: ‘Thou shalt not sell when markets are correcting.’

Any examples of such investments to mention?

We don’t manage any money. We hire outside managers and our clients allocate to these managers. We help them choose managers in every asset class, whether it’s equities, fixed income, real estate, private equity, hedge funds, infrastructure.

Story continues below

How do you choose these managers?

We send our team out to more than 300 manager meetings a year. We’re like super talent scouts in investing.

In the ultra-high-net-worth sphere, everyone is talking alternatives these days.

There is what I call ‘the cocktail party feature’ to alternatives. It’s a cool factor to talk about private equity. But it’s only cool until there’s a downturn and you can’t get out of it for 10 years-plus. Liquidity is incredibly important.

So, proceed cautiously?

Absolutely. You have to ensure that the allocations to alternatives are sized appropriately, given the additional risk.

For instance, you can find an alternatives hedge fund manager who specializes in fixed income and is taking on more risk than your core manager, but you don’t want to allocate half of your fixed-income assets to a higher-risk strategy. You might give them five per cent, and that five per cent is going to be ‘sweating.’ Then, if taking on that additional alternatives risk takes a bad turn, it’s not going to take down the whole portfolio.

How does your company ensure that clients really understand their portfolios?

Coming from journalism and growing up in the investment industry, I realized that the investment industry loves to make people feel that the investment industry is smarter than them. That’s the modus operandi. And I don’t buy that. Our firm goes by a quote I love from Albert Einstein: ‘The definition of genius is to make the complex simple.’

We write clearly and we meet with each client to go through our quarterly report, which is typically invested through multi-manager strategies. We show each manager’s returns and how they’re doing, very clearly. But we also aggregate all of the manager returns into a custom benchmark at the top, so they know how all their assets are doing.

Speaking of complexity, tell me about this interest in AI and your work with the Vector Institute.

We have been part of the FastLane project, started by the Vector Institute, which gives us access to two masters students in computer engineering generative AI. They were selected by Bell Kearns and seconded to the firm for four months. We paid a portion of the cost.

Story continues below

What have they been doing?

We proposed three use cases but went with the one we call ‘low-hanging-fruit.’

Though we only have 45 clients, we have over 200 strategies that are up and running, so we have what I call the Niagara Falls of quarterly reporting. It just pours in here, and we have to distill it. So we want to build a tool for how these different strategies are doing.

Did it work?

We’re not at a solution, but we’re close, so we have hired them for another four months to complete the project. It’s not perfect, but man, is it exciting.

Is client privacy protected?

They are not part of the Bell Kearns system. So we’ve completely ring-fenced our client information. The only thing they have access to is capital markets information.

What is the overall promise of AI in your industry?

Let’s put it this way: If Bell Kearns receives the Niagara Falls of information every quarter and reports on it, what do you think it’s like at Ontario Teachers’, with $250 billion in assets? It’s an efficiency tool.

What’s the top issue wealthy families are facing today?

They’re thinking about their legacies. They want to make sure they have all the pieces in place for a smooth transition to the next gen.

How does Bell Kearns help with that?

Many of our clients have been with us for a long, long time, so they have seen the benefits of long-term thinking. Long-term thinking is easy to say and really, really hard to do, especially when the market drops 20 per cent.

So they have seen the benefit over this long sweep of time where we’ve had COVID, a rapid rise in interest rates, the global financial crisis, two wars. When we build portfolios, we say we’re building a ship that can go through the North Atlantic. We know there’s going to be storms, but it’s going to get from shore to shore.

Responses have been lightly edited for clarity and length.

The Canadian Family Offices newsletter comes out on Sundays and Wednesdays. If you are interested in stories about Canadian enterprising families, family offices and the professionals who work with them, but like your content aggregated, you can sign up for our free newsletter here.

Story continues below

Please visit here to see information about our standards of journalistic excellence.

Market Factors: Five under-discussed reasons to buy stocks

In this edition, the BofA Securities Research Investment Committee describes five less commonly discussed reasons to buy U.S. equities, while some experts are questioning the post-election rally. Our diversion looks for answers for the surging crime rate in the 1970s and, as always, we look ahead to important data releases.

Open this photo in gallery:

Traders work on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) floor on November 12, 2024Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Portfolio strategy

Less-obvious reasons to buy equities

BofA Securities’ Research Investment Committee (RIC) presented five unconventional reasons to own U.S. equities in their most recent monthly update. Many of these bullish drivers are more structural than tactical and might thus be more consistent positive forces for the longer term.

Increasing longevity, and its role in increasing demand for equities, is one under-discussed reason for all investors to own more stocks. Conventional portfolio strategy and products like target funds automatically decrease equity weightings in favour of fixed income as investors age. This strategy is designed to reduce risk but since 2020, inflation has made fixed income volatile. Portfolios with 80 per cent fixed income and 20 per cent equities, for instance, have failed to preserve capital in the past four years.

Current asset allocation recommendations are suited for the current average U.S. lifespan of 77 years. But if U.S. longevity increases to the OECD average of 80, portfolios would require a 2 percentage point higher equity weighting to maintain the same standard of living. Another five years of life would require a 6 percentage point higher equity weighting.

The Canadian average lifespan is already much better than the U.S., at 81. If this improves because of new medical technology, however, equity weightings would have to increase to maintain the same standards of living.

Bullish reason number two is that equities are scarce at a time when demand could increase and scarce entities fetch higher prices. There are now 4,642 publicly traded U.S. companies, roughly half of the number in 1996. The supply of stocks from IPOs, secondary issuance and stock compensation has been hugely outpaced by share buybacks. The amount of available U.S. stock has decreased in 12 of the past 16 years.

The RIC also noted that U.S. stocks are showing strong momentum – reason three to buy. Adding equities to a portfolio when the S&P 500 is at new highs has historically outperformed random entry points by five percentage points.

Reason number four to buy stocks utilizes the work of BofA’s equity and quant strategist Savita Subramanian. Ms. Subramanian emphasizes that the equal weighted S&P 500 is trading at a record discount to the conventional, Magnificent Seven-dominated cap weighted index.

The strategist believes that profit growth for non-technology sectors will play catch-up in 2025, broadening market leadership and driving the benchmark higher. As legendary Merrill Lynch strategist Bob Farrell noted as one of his ten rules of investing, “markets are stronger when they are broad.”

Corporate America owns oceans of cash and that is reason five to buy U.S. stocks. S&P 500 companies own almost US$8-trillion in cash that can be either returned to shareholders via higher dividends (the index dividend yield is currently near record lows) or benefit investors through buybacks. Companies executing buybacks have outperformed the broader market by 2 percentage points per year since 1994.

The RIC team recommend three U.S.-traded ETFs in this report. The S&P 500 Equal-weight Invesco ETF (RSP-A) and the S&P Bank ETF SPDR (KBE-A) are poised to benefit from the broadening of U.S. profit growth. The third suggestion, RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF FT (AIRR-Q), is part of an unrelated on-shoring theme.

Market risks

There’s market downsides for the new president, too

The S&P 500 has climbed a full per cent since last Wednesday morning and the S&P/TSX Composite is up 1.2 per cent. Expectations for faster U.S. growth due to deregulation and a corporate tax cut are the obvious drivers of the rally. However, there are some experts urging caution about the rally’s sustainability.

Wells Fargo investment strategy analyst Austin Pickle urged investors to avoid letting elections and emotions determine portfolio strategy. He notes that campaign promises historically “give way to prioritization and give-and-take with Congress and the legal system.”

Mr. Pickle reminded investors that the first Trump administration incentivized a rally in small caps, real estate and energy stocks before these sectors underperformed to the next election in 2020. Additionally, President Joe Biden enacted incentives for clean energy companies only to see them lag the benchmark.

Wells Fargo recommends watching for the enactment of specific policies while remaining cognizant of the economic and earnings outlook for any new investment.

Former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Bill Dudley also sounded a note of caution in a recent Bloomberg column. He conceded that a potential corporate tax cut and deregulation effort was positive for equities but listed a number of countervailing trends. These include the inflationary effects of expected tariffs and labour scarcity where deportations occur. He also noted that a half percentage point increase in inflation-adjusted yields in the past 10 weeks was negative for risk assets.

I don’t think any of this implies an imminent market bloodbath but I’m also not interested in chasing the rally at this point.

Open this photo in gallery:

An airplane flies overhead as the sun sets behind the Statue of Liberty in New YorkANGELA WEISS/AFP/Getty Images

Diversions

1970s crime wave: was it lead poisoning?

The Marginal Revolution podcast continued its study of the 1970s, this time discussing the sharp spike in violent crime. George Mason economics professors Alex Tabarrok and Tyler Cowen detail the doubling of homicides and tripling of overall violent crime between 1960 and 1980.

The professors paint a picture of New York City that was truly dire – violent crime, fires, graffiti and terrorism could not be handled by a city on the verge of bankruptcy. Off-duty police officers handed out Welcome to Fear City pamphlets to tourists with recommendations including never to ride the subway for any reason.

Potential explanations for the trend are weighed. These include the rise in youth population from 13 to 19 per cent, lead poisoning, hard drug popularization and contagion effects from the rise of serial killers.

The essentials

Looking for our updates on market movers, analyst actions, stock technicals, insider trades and other daily, weekly and monthly insight? Click here to visit our Inside the Market page.

Globe Investor highlights

Million-dollar TFSAs are a thing, but Rob Carrick finds out what’s a “normal” amount to have in your account

Trump’s presidential election win has forced bond strategists to make a material change in their outlook towards higher longer-dated Treasury yields. Meanwhile, here’s a rundown of where Wall Street is placing its bets for Trump 2.0

Investors see safety in India as Trump’s election win casts shadow on emerging markets

What’s up next

A 0.8 per cent month over month decline in domestic manufacturing sales for September is expected when those results are released on Friday. Existing home sales will also be announced that day. For earnings, Brookfield Corp is expected to earn US$0.826 per share when announced Thursday. George Weston reports next Tuesday (C$3.553) and Metro Inc. (C$0.989).

U.S. PPI ex food and energy for October will be out Thursday and a 0.2 per cent month-over-month increase is forecast. (U.S. October CPI ex-food and energy came in Wednesday morning as expected – 0.3 per cent higher month over month). October advance retail sales will be released Friday – a 0.3 per cent month over month gain is expected – and industrial production for October is out the same day (a 0.3 per cent month over month decline expected).

Profits for Walt Disney Corp. are reported Thursday (US$1.102 per share forecasted) along with Applied Materials Inc. (US$2.193). Next Wednesday is a big day, not so much because of Palo Alto Networks Inc. earnings (US$1.48) but because semiconductor behemoth Nvidia Corp. (US$0.739) reports.

See our full economic and earnings calendar here (You can bookmark the page – it gets updated weekly)

Belize Frenchman’s Caye Island has Endless Opportunity for a Real Estate Investor


Belize Frenchman’s Caye Island has Endless Opportunity for a Real Estate Investor – Toronto Stock Exchange News Today – EIN Presswire

























Trusted News Since 1995

A service for global professionals
·
Wednesday, November 13, 2024

·
760,300,664
Articles


·
3+ Million Readers

News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools

News Topics

Newsletters

Press Releases

Events & Conferences

RSS Feeds

Other Services

Questions?




Drills Moved onto Globex’s High-grade Ironwood Gold Deposit

Article content

ROUYN-NORANDA, Quebec, Nov. 13, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — GLOBEX MINING ENTERPRISES INC. (GMX – Toronto Stock Exchange, G1MN – Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Berlin, Munich, Tradegate, Lang & Schwarz, LS Exchange, TTMzero, Düsseldorf and Quotrix Düsseldorf Stock Exchanges
and GLBXF – OTCQX International in the US) is pleased to inform shareholders that we have initiated our planned 17-hole, infill drill program on our 100% owned Ironwood Gold Deposit located in Cadillac Township, Quebec. The Ironwood deposit is located in close proximity of the gold localizing Cadillac Break and Globex’s historical Wood and Central Cadillac gold mines both of which have excellent exploration drill potential.

Advertisement 2

Story continues below

Article content

The Ironwood deposit is currently an inferred resource of 243,200 tonnes grading 17.26 g/t Au and 2.61 g/t Ag. (see Technical Report for The Mineral Resource Estimate, Ironwood Project, Cadillac Township, Quebec, (NTS 32D01), by Reno Pressacco, M.Sc. (A)., P.Geo., February 2008 for the Pandora-Wood Joint Venture).

The aim of the drill program is to confirm and upgrade the current Ironwood inferred resource and possibly test for an extension of the zone. The 17-hole drill program will be undertaken with two drills and is expected to total approximately 3000 m. Once drilling, logging and assaying are completed, further metallurgical testing will be undertaken to better define various methods of recovery of the gold and silver. The ore zone is within a sulphidized iron formation with arsenopyrite, pyrrhotite and pyrite contents of 12.2%, 8.6% and 6.4% respectively. Precious metals occur as a gold/silver alloy freely within arsenopyrite and to a lesser degree within pyrite. Several metallurgical tests have been undertaken including cyanidation of a bulk sulphide concentrate with a gold recovery of 97% and cyanidation of the bulk concentrate produced a gold recovery factor of 93%. Flotation of a high-grade concentrate with low arsenic content produced a gold recovery of 86%. These tests were preliminary in nature and a more exhaustive test work program is planned using mineralized core from the current drill program to determine, based upon a number of available custom milling and smelting avenues, more comprehensive overall recovery factors.

Article content

Advertisement 3

Story continues below

Article content

Globex is initiating this drill program to upgrade the resource as a first step toward possible production at Ironwood. The deposit is small but hi-grade and is located near infrastructure such as an all-season highway, power, skilled labour and several gold mills. Despite the grade and location, there are many risks involved in trying to bring this project to production. They include, permitting under Quebec Mining Act, metallurgical processing and recoveries yet to be detailed, the arsenical nature of the ore, public acceptability that will need to be established through the BAP system, completion of environmental and other studies, choosing the best mining method and negotiating various terms, considering ore sorting of waste material by magnetics, colour sorting or other methods, establishing a relationship with a local mill if we proceed in this way, to treat the ore and dispose of the tailings in an environmentally sound manner, negotiating pricing for the sale of the concentrate, precious metal prices, financing, just to name a few. Another way forward yet to be considered is DSO (Direct Smelting Ore), shipping the ore as mined, crushed, screened and/or sized to a convenient size distribution for a client’s processing offshore. This would eliminate the need for milling. In other words, there is still a lot of work to do.

Advertisement 4

Story continues below

Article content

Despite our optimism there is no guarantee that the project will be put into production by Globex and if it does how long it will take to achieve the required permitting, establish onsite infrastructure, etc.

The Quebec Government currently has proposed a series of changes to the Quebec Mining Act, which will directly affect proposed mining projects and exploration. Globex will need to study the potential effect of these law changes upon its efforts to work out a mining and processing plan including potentially disposal of the arsenic bearing tailings.

This press release was written by Jack Stoch, P. Geo., President and CEO of Globex in his capacity as a Qualified Person (Q.P.) under NI 43-101.

We Seek Safe Harbour.   Foreign Private Issuer 12g3 – 2(b)
  CUSIP Number 379900 50 9
LEI 529900XYUKGG3LF9PY95
For further information, contact:
Jack Stoch, P.Geo., Acc.Dir.
President & CEO
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc.
86, 14th Street
Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec Canada J9X 2J1
Tel.: 819.797.5242
Fax: 819.797.1470
info@globexmining.com
www.globexmining.com

Forward Looking Statements: Except for historical information, this news release may contain certain “forward looking statements”.  These statements may involve a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity and performance to be materially different from the expectations and projections of Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (“Globex”).  No assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking information will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits Globex will derive therefrom.  A more detailed discussion of the risks is available in the “Annual Information Form” filed by Globex on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.


Article content

Comments

Join the Conversation

Featured Local Savings

How Canadian millennials can get financial revenge for missing the real estate boom

Young people may be at a disadvantage when it comes to affordable home ownership, but instead of getting mad, they can aim to get rich

Article content

Kristy Shen, who is in her early 40s, has never bought a home and doesn’t plan to (unless you count her shares in real estate investment trusts).

Advertisement 2

Story continues below

Article content

Recommended Videos

But when she was in her late twenties and working in the tech sector, Shen felt the pressure to become a homeowner, too.

“I was actually trying to buy a house, just like everybody else in Toronto,” Shen acknowledged. “Back (in 2015), it was already getting to the point where people couldn’t afford to buy. The average single-family (detached) home (in the city) was near $1 million.”

Still, after the 2008 financial crisis, Shen no longer felt like she had the same job security and was concerned about losing her position due to outsourcing. She said her goals changed drastically after a coworker at her job collapsed at his desk and underwent emergency surgery after overworking himself.

Shen decided she didn’t want to continue working until she was 65 just so that she could pay off a massive mortgage, and sought financial independence instead.

Advertisement 3

Story continues below

Article content

“Instead of taking the money that I saved to put a down payment towards a house, I put it into a portfolio and bought index funds, instead. And then that portfolio grew over time,” she said.

When she was 32, Shen and her husband managed to retire with $1 million in savings and started travelling the world.

The math on home ownership doesn’t make sense

Shen, who grew up in poverty in China, said she took an engineering degree just because she thought it would bring her financial stability.

“I did the math to figure out whether this was actually the correct career and it was a good return on investment,” she said, recalling that her father once told her that if she followed her dreams of becoming a writer, he couldn’t financially support her if things didn’t work out.

Advertisement 4

Story continues below

Article content

The math on homeownership did not make sense for her, however, and doesn’t for many other young Canadians today. The underlying issues have much less to do with avocado toast (the stereotypical critique of younger generations unable to save because they spend on luxuries) and much more to do with increasing housing unaffordability.

“I think that we need to write a new rule book, because the rule book is coming from our parents who actually were able to afford houses that were only two to three times their annual salary,” Shen said. “And now my peers and the next generation are trying to buy a house that’s 20 times their annual salary. It doesn’t make sense.”

Jason Heath, managing director and certified financial planner at Objective Financial Partners Inc., pointed to the rapidly rising cost of real estate compared with slower income growth as a major impediment preventing younger generations from building wealth the way their parents did.

Advertisement 5

Story continues below

Article content

“I think there’s been too much of an emphasis on real estate and that being the only path for people to accumulate financial wealth, perhaps at the expense of other options, like investing in the stock market,” Heath said. “If you were to look at (the S&P 500 index’s returns) over the course of the last 10 years, it’s generated about a 13 per cent annual rate of return — much higher, frankly, than real estate prices have appreciated in most parts of Canada.”

According to the Canadian Real Estate Association, the benchmark home price has climbed from $399,000 in September 2014 to $713,200 in September 2024. Crunching the numbers translates to a 6.3 per cent average annual increase.

However, it is important to note that in the past year, home prices have declined by 3.3 per cent.

Advertisement 6

Story continues below

Article content

“Even though real estate has done relatively well over the last generation in Canada, I think it’s super important that people don’t put all of their eggs into that basket,” Heath warned.

“We tend to suffer from a recency bias, where just because something has done well recently, we anticipate or expect that it will (do well) going forward. And I’m in the camp where I think the next 25 years may be very different.”

Can a renter generate the same wealth as a homeowner via investing?

It is possible for someone to become a wealthy renter today, Heath believes, noting that renting is typically cheaper compared with paying off a mortgage.

“I don’t think that real estate is necessarily the only path to become wealthy.”

He said a renter could potentially build the same kind of wealth that someone could generate through homeownership in an ideal scenario where a person who has extra cash invests their savings into the stock market.

Advertisement 7

Story continues below

Article content

“A disciplined renter, especially if they were investing in stocks and a low-cost portfolio and they were taking advantage of tax-sheltered accounts — could they be in the same position (as a homeowner) years from now? I think they could be.”

Tsur Somerville, who holds a real estate finance professorship at the University of British Columbia’s Sauder School of Business, published a study in 2007 that compared wealth accumulation between homeowners and renters.

One of the key findings that still holds true today is that homeowners benefit from the “forced savings” aspect of making monthly payments on a mortgage, which allows them to build equity, Somerville said. It is much harder for renters to set extra funds aside and invest them on their own.

Advertisement 8

Story continues below

Article content

The report concluded that for renters to accumulate the same amount of wealth as homeowners, they needed to be “extremely diligent savers, invest in a high yield instrument, do so with minimal fees, and have the good fortune to live in one of the cities where the right combination of low rents and/or low house price growth allows them to invest more in a relatively higher return asset.”

For example, in the “best-case” scenario — which required renters to invest 100 per cent of the difference between owner and renter payments in the Toronto Stock Exchange and pay very low investment management fees — renters in Edmonton, Halifax, Montreal and Regina could accumulate 20 per cent more wealth than homebuyers.

However, the report found investment-savvy renters in Calgary and Toronto could not match the wealth gains of homeowners due to expensive rental rates in the former and rapidly rising home prices in the latter.

Advertisement 9

Story continues below

Article content

Can the average millennial or younger Canadian afford to invest?

Shen and her husband, who worked in high-paying tech jobs, had already saved about half a million dollars by 2012. Shen said her scarcity mindset meant she tried to be as thrifty as possible, taking public transportation and cooking at home instead of eating out.

However, the couple’s fixed expenses have been relatively low as well. They rented the second floor of a townhouse in Greektown in Toronto for about a decade at about $850 a month. During the COVID-19 pandemic, rent prices dipped and they found a place in a rent-controlled building in Toronto for $1,576 a month.

For other working young adults who live with their parents and pay little to no rent, it makes sense for them to start investing early and benefit from compounding rates of return. The most recent census data from 2021 shows more than 35 per cent of Canadians aged 20 to 34 were living with at least one parent.

Advertisement 10

Story continues below

Article content

The solution is not so simple for people who rent and do not receive financial assistance from their family, or who don’t work in high-paying jobs. The renting and investing scenario is contingent on whether the renter has the excess cash to invest in the first place, Somerville noted.

“A lot of renters are lower income, and therefore their ability to accumulate wealth is compromised by their lower income, not by the fact that they’re renters,” he said, adding that rent prices have escalated in the past three to four years.

The latest report from Rentals.ca Network Inc. showed the average asking rent for all property types across the country climbed from $1,845 in October 2019 to $2,152 in October 2024.

“The whole system here depends on (whether) I can rent at a rate that allows me to accumulate,” Somerville said.

Advertisement 11

Story continues below

Article content

Statistics Canada’s 2023 survey of financial security revealed the median net worth of younger families (where the highest income earner was under 35) who owned their principal residence swelled by $142,800 from 2019 to hit $457,100 in 2023.

In comparison, the median net worth of younger families who did not own their principal residence increased by just $26,700 to $44,000 in 2023.

That said, the survey also found that an increasing share of young families who did not own their principal residence were generating wealth. Among young families who rented their principal residence and had no employer pension plan, 15 per cent had a net worth greater than $150,000 in 2023, compared with just 5 per cent in 2019.

These families were likely to hold assets in real estate (that wasn’t their principal residence), in registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs) or tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs).

Advertisement 12

Story continues below

Article content

Other tips for millennials and gen z on investing and wealth creation

People in their early 20s might not necessarily be ready to invest all their savings in an RRSP, which places penalties on early withdrawals, Objective Financial’s Heath cautioned.

Instead, they could consider using a TFSA, so that they can make tax-free withdrawals when needed, whether for their tuition or to cover their next month’s rent, or even eventually make a down payment on a home.

“It’s good to think long term, but you also need to realize that there are a lot of short-term things that come up when you’re young,” he said.

He also advised that young investors avoid making investments in speculative stocks or relying on social media influencers for financial advice. He recommended that people who cannot afford to work with a financial professional consider low-cost exchange-traded funds that include Canadian stocks, U.S. stocks, international stocks and bonds.

Advertisement 13

Story continues below

Article content

“Wealth creation and becoming financially independent tends to be slow and steady and boring,” Heath said. “I wish there were a magic solution to it, but, usually, it’s just doing a whole bunch of small things right over a long period of time.”

Shen, who co-authored a book, Quit Like a Millionaire, and, with her husband, created Millennial Revolution, a personal finance blog, said she understands why younger Canadians today are frustrated and anxious about their future, whether that’s due to inflation, artificial intelligence or even climate change.

Recommended from Editorial

  1. For this young Canadian, building wealth is important, but it's not her main goal in life.

    Can this B.C. gen Z woman reach her goal of $1 million?

  2. Millennials’ wealth has been falling further behind other generations, according to Statistics Canada.

    Millennials’ wealth falls further behind gen X, baby boomers

However, while they can’t change their situation, she said they can change their strategy.

“It’s very easy to get very nihilistic,” she said. “But I would advise trying to look for opportunities to do things differently, instead of just banging your head against the wall and trying to follow the old advice from 20 or 30, 40 years ago.”

• Email: slouis@postmedia.com

Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.

Article content

Comments

Join the Conversation

Featured Local Savings

Bitfarms Reports Third Quarter 2024 Results

Article content

– Revenue of $45 million, up 8% Q/Q and up 30% Y/Y –
– Gross mining margin of 38%, compared to 51% in Q2 2024 and 44% in Q3 2023 –
– Current hashrate of 11.9 EH/s, up from 10.4 EH/s in Q2 2024 –
– Current efficiency of 21 w/TH, a 16% improvement from June 30, 2024 –
– Synthetic HODL increased to 802 at October 31, 2024 from 208 long-dated BTC call options at June 30, 2024, up 286% –

This news release constitutes a “designated news release” for the purposes of the Company’s amended and restated prospectus supplement dated October 4, 2024, to its short form base shelf prospectus dated November 10, 2023.

Advertisement 2

Story continues below

Article content

TORONTO, Ontario and BROSSARD, Québec, Nov. 13, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitfarms Ltd. (Nasdaq/TSX: BITF), a global vertically integrated Bitcoin data center company, reported its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2024. All financial references are in U.S. dollars.

During the quarter, Bitfarms continued to execute its transformational fleet upgrade and executed upon its strategic rebalancing and expansion of its operations in the U.S.

To that end, Bitfarms announced its acquisition of Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (Nasdaq: SDIG) (“Stronghold”), which is expected to put Bitfarms on track to increase its energy portfolio to over 950 MW by year-end 2025 with potential for multi-year expansion capacity of up to 1.6 GW. This represents a significant shift of Bitfarms’ portfolio towards the U.S., which will come to represent approximately 66% of the Company’s total portfolio, an eleven-fold increase from 6% operating power in the U.S. today. Bitfarms has already begun maximizing the utility of the Stronghold sites with two consecutive hosting agreements totaling 20,000 miners, signed in September and October, supporting approximately 4 EH/s. Upon close of the Stronghold acquisition, these hosting agreements will revert to self-mining operations.

Advertisement 3

Story continues below

Article content

The Company continues to make progress on its fleet upgrade program, deploying 5,400 additional miners during the quarter and achieving its efficiency target of 21 w/TH three months ahead of schedule. This efficiency represents a 40% improvement year-to-date, reducing direct operating costs per terahash and improving gross margins.

In addition, Bitfarms will be upgrading the remaining 18,853 T21 miners to be delivered by Bitmain as part of Bitfarms’ fleet upgrade program announced last year. Under the agreement, Bitfarms will be installing more powerful and efficient S21 Pro miners, operating at 234 TH/s and 15 w/TH, which represents more than a 20% improvement from the T21 miners in both energy efficiency and hashrate.

During the quarter, Bitfarms took significant steps to strengthen its leadership team with new hires and a new management structure, providing greater scalability and accountability in data center development and operations, and laying the foundation for the establishment of HPC/AI operations. Bitfarms also strengthened its corporate governance with the appointment of two new directors and the appointment of the former Lead Director to Independent Chairman. The Bitfarms Board of Directors now consists of five members, four of whom are independent. The Company will hold a Special Meeting on November 20th to vote on an expansion of the Board from five to six members, the nomination of Andrew J. Chang to the Board, and the ratification of the Company’s Shareholder Rights Plan.

Article content

Advertisement 4

Story continues below

Article content

In line with its strategy to diversify beyond Bitcoin mining and maximize the value of its power assets, Bitfarms has selected two U.S. sites for a one to two MW HPC/AI pilot site. While still early stages, the land and power are secured at both sites, with active conversations taking place with potential partners and suppliers to discuss potential accelerated deployment in 2025. The Company is currently in the process of finalizing terms, plans and budgets as the first step in executing a comprehensive long-term HPC/AI strategy.

CFO Jeff Lucas concluded, “Despite third quarter headwinds of record low hashprices for the Bitcoin mining industry, a 62% year-over-year increase in network difficulty, and the first full quarter following the April Halving Event, our mining operations remained profitable and continued to drive free cash flow. While we achieved our year-end efficiency target of 21 w/TH in the third quarter, shipping delays and continued miner servicing of our Bitmain T21s impacted our ability to reach 21 EH/s in 2024. We are working closely with Bitmain on warranty servicing and miner upgrades and expect to reach 21 EH/s in the first half of 2025.”

Advertisement 5

Story continues below

Article content

“As previously communicated, 2024 has been a transformative year for Bitfarms,” stated CEO Ben Gagnon. “Year-to-date, we’ve refreshed nearly our entire fleet of miners, significantly improving our mining economics, acquired one new site and entered agreements to acquire two additional new sites in the U.S., and completely revamped our operational and Board structure, strengthening our leadership and corporate governance.  We are now uniquely positioned with a strategic pipeline of over 950 MW in 2025 with nearly half a gigawatt of power infrastructure unallocated with miners. This represents a massive, secured, and cost-effective near-term growth opportunity with the flexibility necessary to maximize shareholder value as we approach the anticipated 2025 Bitcoin bull cycle.”

Q3 2024 & Recent Operating Highlights

Operations

  • Current hashrate of 11.9 EH/s, up from 10.4 EH/s in Q2 2024.
  • Averaged 7.6 BTC per day in daily production for Q3 2024.

Data Center Portfolio Expansion & Fleet Upgrade

  • Deployed 5,400 additional miners across three data centers in Canada, U.S., and Paraguay, for a total of approximately 47,900 miners deployed year-to-date in 2024.
  • Entered into a definitive merger agreement, pursuant to which the Company will acquire Stronghold, a vertically integrated crypto asset mining company with operations located in Pennsylvania, in a stock-for-stock merger transaction.
  • Closed the lease agreement in Sharon, Pennsylvania, providing the Company with an immediate capacity of 12 MW of electricity with up to 98 MW of additional development capacity. Bitfarms also signed a letter of intent for a lease to an additional 10 MW site, which would bring total site capacity to 120 MW.
  • Entered into two miner hosting agreements with Stronghold as of October 31, 2024, which will accelerate the deployment of 20,000 miners supporting approximately 4.0 EH/s.
  • On November 12, 2024, the Company amended its agreements with Bitmain to upgrade the remaining 18,853 Bitmain T21 miners to be delivered by Bitmain to superior performing S21 Pro miners. The upgrade will cost an incremental $33.2 million payable in cash or Bitcoin with the option for the Company to redeem the Bitcoin for cash in four quarterly payments based on the price of Bitcoin at the time the Bitcoin is originally tendered.

Advertisement 6

Story continues below

Article content

Personnel Appointments & Corporate Updates

  • Appointed Ben Gagnon as Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Director of the Board of Directors (“the Board”), Liam Wilson as Chief Operating Officer, Benoit Gobeil as Chief Infrastructure Officer, Alex Brammer as SVP of Mining Operations, and Rachel Silverstein as U.S. General Counsel.
  • Appointed Amy Freedman as Independent Director of the Board and Lead Director Brian Howlett as Independent Chairman of the Board; accepted the resignations of Nicolas Bonta and Andrés Finkielsztain from the Board.
  • Entered into a settlement agreement with Riot Platforms, Inc. on September 24, 2024
  • Settled the employment dispute with the former CEO.
  • Nominated Andrew Chang for election to the Board at the Special Meeting of Shareholders, taking place on November 20, 2024.

Q3 2024 Financial Highlights

  • Total revenue of $45 million, up 8% Q/Q.
  • Gross mining profit* and gross mining margin* of $17 million and 38%, respectively, down from $21 million and 51% in Q2 2024, respectively.
  • General and administrative expenses of $28 million, up 123% Q/Q.
  • Operating loss of $44 million, which included $10 million accelerated depreciation on older miners in connection with the transformative fleet upgrade, compared to an operating loss of $24 million in Q2 2024, which included $46 million accelerated depreciation on older miners.
  • Net loss of $37 million, or $(0.08) per basic and diluted share which included a $6 million non-cash gain for revaluation of warrant liabilities in connection with 2023 financing activities. This compares to a net loss of $27 million, or $(0.07) per basic and diluted share in Q2 2024, which included a $1 million non-cash expense for revaluation of warrant liabilities in connection with 2021 and 2023 financing activities.
  • Adjusted EBITDA* of $6 million, or 14% of revenue, down from $12 million, or 28% of revenue, in Q2 2024.
  • The Company earned 703 BTC at an average direct cost of production per BTC* of $36,000, compared to $30,600 in Q2 2024.
  • Total cash cost of production per BTC* was $52,400 in Q3 2024, up from $47,300 in Q2 2024 due to higher energy cost, increased network difficulty and lower transaction fees.

Advertisement 7

Story continues below

Article content

Liquidity**
As of September 30, 2024, the Company had total liquidity** of $146 million, comprised of $73 million in cash and 1,147 BTC valued at $73 million based on a BTC price of $63,300 at September 30, 2024. As of October 31, 2024, the Company held 1,188 BTC.

Q3 2024 and Recent Financing Activities

  • Sold 461 BTC at an average price of $60,600 for total proceeds of $28 million in Q3 2024 and sold 194 of the 236 BTC earned during October 2024, generating total proceeds of $13 million. A portion of the funds was used to pay capital expenditures.
  • Added 41 BTC to treasury in October 2024 for a total of 1,188 BTC held in treasury, representing a total value of $84 million based on a $71,000 BTC price on October 31, 2024.
  • Synthetic HODL increased to 802 as of October 31, 2024 from 208 Bitcoin in Q2 2024, up 286%.
  • Raised $66 million in net proceeds during Q3 2024 bringing the total year-to-date net proceeds to $279 million through November 12th, 2024 through the Company’s 2024 at-the-market equity offering program.
  • Deposited a total of $15.6 million with Stronghold as of October 31, 2024, which is refundable on December 31, 2025, in connection with the two hosting agreements.
  • Collected the remaining $5 million balance of the Canadian sales tax recovery of the approximately $24 million total claims between February 5, 2022 and April 2024, for which the refund was confirmed by the provincial tax authorities in the second quarter of 2024.

Advertisement 8

Story continues below

Article content

Quarterly Operating Performance

  Q3 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2023
Total BTC earned 703 614 1,172
Average Watts/Average TH efficiency*** 23 28 36
BTC sold 461 515 1,018
  As of
September 30,
As of
June 30,
As of
September 30,
  2024 2024 2023
Operating EH/s 11.3 10.4 6.1
Operating capacity (MW) 310 310 234
Hydropower (MW) 256 256 183


Quarterly Average Revenue**** and Cost of Production per BTC*

  Q3 2024 Q2 2024 Q1 2024 Q4 2023 Q3 2023
Avg. Rev****/BTC $60,900 $65,800 $52,400 $36,400 $28,100
Direct Cost*/BTC $36,000 $30,600 $18,400 $14,400 $15,100
Total Cash Cost*/BTC $52,400 $47,300 $27,900 $23,200 $20,800


* Gross mining profit, gross mining margin, EBITDA, EBITDA margin, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA margin, Direct Cost per BTC and Total Cash Cost per BTC are non-IFRS financial measures or ratios and should be read in conjunction with, and should not be viewed as alternatives to or replacements of measures of operating results and liquidity presented in accordance with IFRS. Readers are referred to the reconciliations of non-IFRS measures included in the Company’s MD&A and at the end of this press release.

** Liquidity represents cash and balance of digital assets.
*** Average watts represent the energy consumption of miners.
**** Average revenue per BTC is for mining operations only and excludes Volta revenue.

Advertisement 9

Story continues below

Article content

Conference Call

Management will host a conference call today at 8:00 am EST. A presentation of the Q3 2024 results will be accessible before the call on the Investor website and can be accessed here.

The live webcast and a webcast replay of the conference call can be accessed here. To access the call by telephone, register here to receive dial-in numbers and a unique PIN to join the call.

Upcoming Conferences & Events

November 14: Cantor Crypto, Digital Assets & AI Infrastructure Conference (Miami)
November 19-20: ROTH Technology Conference (NYC)
November 20: Special Meeting of Bitfarms Shareholders (Virtual)
December 4: B. Riley Crypto & Energy Infrastructure Conference (NYC)
December 12: Northland Growth Conference (Virtual)
January 14-15, 2025: Needham Growth Conference (NYC)

Non-IFRS Measures*
As a Canadian company, Bitfarms follows International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) which are issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB). Under IFRS rules, the Company does not reflect the revaluation gains on the mark-to-market of its Bitcoin holdings in its income statement. It also does not include the revaluation losses on the mark-to-market of its Bitcoin holdings in Adjusted EBITDA, which is a measure of the cash profitability of its operations and does not reflect the change in value of its assets and liabilities.

Advertisement 10

Story continues below

Article content

The Company uses Adjusted EBITDA to measure its operating activities’ financial performance and cash generating capability.

2023 Restatement
During the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company reassessed the application of IFRS Accounting Standards on the accounting for warrants issued in connection with private placement financings conducted in 2021 and, as such, restated (the “Restatement”) its consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2022 and January 1, 2022, its consolidated statements of profit or loss and comprehensive profit or loss for the year ended December 31, 2022,and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and its consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2022 and the nine months ended September 30, 2023, which were previously filed on SEDAR+ and EDGAR. For further details, consult Note 3e of the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, and Note 3d of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, available on SEDAR+ and EDGAR. As described in the interim MD&A for three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, available on SEDAR+ and EDGAR, the Company is undertaking remediation efforts in light of the Restatement and in order to improve the overall effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting for the accounting of complex financial instruments.

Advertisement 11

Story continues below

Article content

About Bitfarms Ltd.
Founded in 2017, Bitfarms is a global Bitcoin data center company that contributes its computational power to one or more mining pools from which it receives payment in Bitcoin. Bitfarms develops, owns, and operates vertically integrated mining farms with in-house management and company-owned electrical engineering, installation service, and multiple onsite technical repair centers. The Company’s proprietary data analytics system delivers best-in-class operational performance and uptime.

Bitfarms currently has 12 operating Bitcoin data centers and two under development, and two under Hosting agreements, situated in four countries: Canada, the United States, Paraguay, and Argentina. Powered predominantly by environmentally friendly hydro-electric and long-term power contracts, Bitfarms is committed to using sustainable and often underutilized energy infrastructure.

To learn more about Bitfarms’ events, developments, and online communities:

www.bitfarms.com
https://www.facebook.com/bitfarms/
https://twitter.com/Bitfarms_io
https://www.instagram.com/bitfarms/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bitfarms/

Advertisement 12

Story continues below

Article content

Glossary of Terms

  • BTC BTC/day = Bitcoin or Bitcoin per day
  • EH or EH/s = Exahash or exahash per second
  • MW or MWh = Megawatts or megawatt hour
  • w/TH = Watts/Terahash efficiency (includes cost of powering supplementary equipment)
  • Q/Q = Quarter over Quarter
  • Y/Y = Year over Year
  • Synthetic HODL™ = the use of instruments that create Bitcoin equivalent exposure
  • HPC/AI = High Performance Computing / Artificial Intelligence

Forward-Looking Statements  

This news release contains certain “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “forward-looking information”) that are based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release and are covered by safe harbors under Canadian and United States securities laws. The statements and information in this release regarding the impact of the hosting agreements, projected growth, target hashrate, opportunities relating to the Company’s geographical diversification and expansion, deployment of miners as well as the timing therefore, closing of the Stronghold acquisition on a timely basis and on the terms as announced, the ability to gain access to additional electrical power and grow hashrate of the Stronghold business, performance of the plants and equipment upgrades and the impact on operating capacity including the target hashrate and multi-year expansion capacity, the opportunities to leverage Bitfarms’ proven expertise to successfully enhance energy efficiency and hashrate, and other statements regarding future growth, plans and objectives of the Company are forward-looking information.

Advertisement 13

Story continues below

Article content

Any statements that involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often but not always using phrases such as “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “forecasts”, “estimates”, “prospects”, “believes” or “intends” or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results “may” or “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information.

This forward-looking information is based on assumptions and estimates of management of Bitfarms at the time they were made, and involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of Bitfarms to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Such factors, risks and uncertainties include, among others: receipt of the approval of the shareholders of Stronghold and the Toronto Stock Exchange for the Stronghold acquisition as well as other applicable regulatory approvals; that the Stronghold acquisition may not close within the timeframe anticipated or at all or may not close on the terms and conditions currently anticipated by the parties for a number of reasons including, without limitation, as a result of a failure to satisfy the conditions to closing of the Stronghold acquisition; the construction and operation of new facilities may not occur as currently planned, or at all; expansion of existing facilities may not materialize as currently anticipated, or at all; new miners may not perform up to expectations; revenue may not increase as currently anticipated, or at all; the ongoing ability to successfully mine digital currency is not assured; failure of the equipment upgrades to be installed and operated as planned; the availability of additional power may not occur as currently planned, or at all; expansion may not materialize as currently anticipated, or at all; the power purchase agreements and economics thereof may not be as advantageous as expected; potential environmental cost and regulatory penalties due to the operation of the Stronghold plants which entail environmental risk and certain additional risk factors particular to the business of Stronghold including, land reclamation requirements may be burdensome and expensive, changes in tax credits related to coal refuse power generation could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and future development efforts, competition in power markets may have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, cash flows and the market value of the assets, the business is subject to substantial energy regulation and may be adversely affected by legislative or regulatory changes, as well as liability under, or any future inability to comply with, existing or future energy regulations or requirements, the operations are subject to a number of risks arising out of the threat of climate change, and environmental laws, energy transitions policies and initiatives and regulations relating to emissions and coal residue management, which could result in increased operating and capital costs and reduce the extent of business activities, operation of power generation facilities involves significant risks and hazards customary to the power industry that could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and there may not have adequate insurance to cover these risks and hazards, employees, contractors, customers and the general public may be exposed to a risk of injury due to the nature of the operations, limited experience with carbon capture programs and initiatives and dependence on third-parties, including consultants, contractors and suppliers to develop and advance carbon capture programs and initiatives, and failure to properly manage these relationships, or the failure of these consultants, contractors and suppliers to perform as expected, could have a material adverse effect on the business, prospects or operations; the digital currency market; the ability to successfully mine digital currency; it may not be possible to profitably liquidate the current digital currency inventory, or at all; a decline in digital currency prices may have a significant negative impact on operations; an increase in network difficulty may have a significant negative impact on operations; the volatility of digital currency prices; the anticipated growth and sustainability of hydroelectricity for the purposes of cryptocurrency mining in the applicable jurisdictions; the inability to maintain reliable and economical sources of power to operate cryptocurrency mining assets; the risks of an increase in electricity costs, cost of natural gas, changes in currency exchange rates, energy curtailment or regulatory changes in the energy regimes in the jurisdictions in which Bitfarms and Stronghold operate and the potential adverse impact on profitability; future capital needs and the ability to complete current and future financings, including Bitfarms’ ability to utilize an at-the-market offering program ( “ATM Program”) and the prices at which securities may be sold in such ATM Program, as well as capital market conditions in general; share dilution resulting from an ATM Program and from other equity issuances; volatile securities markets impacting security pricing unrelated to operating performance; the risk that a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could result in a misstatement of financial position that may lead to a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements if not prevented or detected on a timely basis; historical prices of digital currencies and the ability to mine digital currencies that will be consistent with historical prices; and the adoption or expansion of any regulation or law that will prevent Bitfarms from operating its business, or make it more costly to do so. For further information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties, refer to Bitfarms’ filings on www.sedarplus.ca (which are also available on the website of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) at www.sec.gov), including the MD&A for the year-ended December 31, 2023, filed on March 7, 2024 and the MD&A for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 filed on November 13, 2024, and its registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-282657) filed by Bitfarms with the SEC (the “registration statement”), which includes a proxy statement of Stronghold that also constitutes a prospectus of Bitfarms (the “proxy statement/prospectus”). Although Bitfarms has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, including factors that are currently unknown to or deemed immaterial by Bitfarms. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate as actual results, and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking information. Bitfarms does not undertake any obligation to revise or update any forward-looking information other than as required by law. Trading in the securities of the Company should be considered highly speculative. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein. Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange, Nasdaq, or any other securities exchange or regulatory authority accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Advertisement 14

Story continues below

Article content

Additional Information about the Merger and Where to Find It
This communication relates to a proposed merger between Stronghold and Bitfarms. In connection with the proposed merger, Bitfarms has filed the registration statement with the SEC. After the registration statement is declared effective, Stronghold will mail the proxy statement/prospectus to its shareholders. This communication is not a substitute for the registration statement, the proxy statement/prospectus or any other relevant documents Bitfarms and Stronghold has filed or will file with the SEC. Investors are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus (including all amendments and supplements thereto) and other relevant documents filed with the SEC carefully and in their entirety if and when they become available because they will contain important information about the proposed merger and related matters.

Investors may obtain free copies of the registration statement, the proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents filed by Bitfarms and Stronghold with the SEC, when they become available, through the website maintained by the SEC at www sec.gov. Copies of the documents may also be obtained for free from Bitfarms by contacting Bitfarms’ Investor Relations Department at investors@bitfarms.com and from Stronghold by contacting Stronghold’s Investor Relations Department at SDIG@gateway-grp.com.

Advertisement 15

Story continues below

Article content

No Offer or Solicitation
This communication is not intended to and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, sell or solicit any securities or any proxy, vote or approval, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offer of securities shall be deemed to be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Participants in Solicitation Relating to the Merger 
Bitfarms, Stronghold, their respective directors and certain of their respective executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from Stronghold’s shareholders in respect of the proposed merger. Information regarding Bitfarms’ directors and executive officers can be found in Bitfarms’ annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed on March 7, 2024, as well as its other filings with the SEC. Information regarding Stronghold’s directors and executive officers can be found in Stronghold’s proxy statement for its 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2024, and supplemented on June 7, 2024, and in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on March 8, 2024. This communication may be deemed to be solicitation material in respect of the proposed merger. Additional information regarding the interests of such potential participants, including their respective interests by security holdings or otherwise, is set forth in the proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents filed with the SEC in connection with the proposed merger if and when they become available. These documents are available free of charge on the SEC’s website and from Bitfarms and Stronghold using the sources indicated above.

Advertisement 16

Story continues below

Article content

Investor Relations Contacts:

Bitfarms
Tracy Krumme
SVP, Head of IR & Corp. Comms.
+1 786-671-5638
tkrumme@bitfarms.com

Media Contacts:

Québec: Tact
Louis-Martin Leclerc
+1 418-693-2425
lmleclerc@tactconseil.ca        

 
Bitfarms Ltd. Consolidated Financial & Operational Results
 
    Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
(U.S.$ in thousands except where indicated)   2024   2023 (3) $ Change % Change 2024   2023 (3) $ Change % Change
Revenues   44,853   34,596   10,257   30 % 136,718   100,125   36,593   37 %
Cost of revenues   (56,642 ) (43,462 ) (13,180 ) 30 % (170,464 ) (123,384 ) (47,080 ) 38 %
Gross loss   (11,789 ) (8,866 ) (2,923 ) 33 % (33,746 ) (23,259 ) (10,487 ) 45 %
Gross margin (1)   (26 )% (26 )%     (25 )% (23 )%    
                   
Operating expenses                  
General and administrative expenses   (27,600 ) (8,372 ) (19,228 ) 230 % (53,198 ) (25,887 ) (27,311 ) 106 %
(Revaluation loss) reversal of revaluation loss on digital assets     (1,183 ) 1,183   100 %   1,512   (1,512 ) (100 )%
Loss on disposition of property, plant and equipment and deposits   (875 ) (217 ) (658 ) 303 % (606 ) (1,776 ) 1,170   (66 )%
Impairment on short-term prepaid deposits, property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale   (3,628 )   (3,628 ) (100 )% (3,628 ) (9,982 ) 6,354   (64 )%
Operating loss   (43,892 ) (18,638 ) (25,254 ) 135 % (91,178 ) (59,392 ) (31,786 ) 54 %
Operating margin (1)   (98 )% (54 )%     (67 )% (59 )%    
                   
Net financial income   7,241   2,532   4,709   186 % 17,367   12,492   4,875   39 %
Net loss before income taxes   (36,651 ) (16,106 ) (20,545 ) 128 % (73,811 ) (46,900 ) (26,911 ) 57 %
                   
Income tax (expense) recovery   2   (401 ) 403   100 % 4,583   23   4,560   nm  
Net loss   (36,649 ) (16,507 ) (20,142 ) 122 % (69,228 ) (46,877 ) (22,351 ) 48 %
                   
Basic and diluted loss per share (in U.S. dollars)   (0.08 ) (0.06 )     (0.17 ) (0.19 )    
Change in revaluation surplus – digital assets, net of tax   721   (824 ) 1,545   188 % 12,699   1,567   11,132   710 %
Total comprehensive loss, net of tax   (35,928 ) (17,331 ) (18,597 ) 107 % (56,529 ) (45,310 ) (11,219 ) 25 %
                   
Gross Mining profit (2)   16,699   14,527   2,172   15 % 68,689   44,823   23,866   53 %
Gross Mining margin (2)   38 % 44 %     52 % 47 %    
EBITDA (2)   (9,836 ) 5,999   (15,835 ) (264 )% 38,563   18,633   19,930   107 %
EBITDA margin (2)   (22 )% 17 %     28 % 19 %    
Adjusted EBITDA (2)   6,352   8,883   (2,531 ) (28 )% 41,424   27,226   14,198   52 %
Adjusted EBITDA margin (2)   14 % 26 %     30 % 27 %    

Advertisement 17

Story continues below

Article content

nm: not meaningful

   
1         Gross margin and Operating margin are supplemental financial ratios; refer to Section 9 – Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures and Ratios of the Company’s MD&A.
2         Gross Mining profit, Gross Mining margin, EBITDA, EBITDA margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are non-IFRS measures or ratios; refer to Section 9 – Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures and Ratios of the Company’s MD&A.
3         Prior year figures are derived from restated financial statements. Refer to the Q3 2024 interim financial statements Note 3d – Basis of Presentation and Material Accounting Policy Information Restatement.
   

 

 
Bitfarms Ltd. Reconciliation of Consolidated Net Income (loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
 
    Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
(U.S.$ in thousands except where indicated)   2024   2023 (1)   $ Change   % Change   2024   2023 (1)   $ Change   % Change  
Revenues   44,853   34,596   10,257   30 % 136,718   100,125   36,593   37 %
                                   
Net loss before income taxes   (36,651 ) (16,106 ) (20,545 ) 128 % (73,811 ) (46,900 ) (26,911 ) 57 %
Interest (income) and expense   (2,014 ) 338   (2,352 ) (696 )% (4,009 ) 2,538   (6,547 ) (258 )%
Depreciation and amortization   28,829   21,767   7,062   32 % 125,143   62,995   62,148   99 %
Sales tax recovery – depreciation and amortization         % (8,760 )   (8,760 ) 100 %
EBITDA   (9,836 ) 5,999   (15,835 ) (264 )% 38,563   18,633   19,930   107 %
EBITDA margin   (22)%   17 %     28 % 19 %    
Share-based payment   5,159   2,011   3,148   157 % 9,928   7,009   2,919   42 %
Impairment on short-term prepaid deposits, property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale   3,628     3,628   100 % 3,628   9,982   (6,354 ) (64 )%
Revaluation loss (reversal of revaluation loss) on digital assets     1,183   (1,183 ) 100 %   (1,512 ) 1,512   100 %
Gain on extinguishment of long-term debt and lease liabilities         %   (12,835 ) 12,835   100 %
(Gain) loss revaluation of warrants   (5,704 ) (2,196 ) (3,508 ) 160 % (13,289 ) 214   (13,503 ) nm  
Gain on disposition of marketable securities   (780 ) (4,120 ) 3,340   (81 )% (1,531 ) (11,246 ) 9,715   (86 )%
Service fees not associated with ongoing operations   9,253     9,253   100 % 12,479     12,479   100 %
Sales tax recovery – prior years – energy and infrastructure and general and administrative expenses (2)     2,366   (2,366 ) 100 % (16,081 ) 6,796   (22,877 ) (337 )%
Net financial expense and other   4,632   3,640   992   27 % 7,727   10,185   (2,458 ) (24 )%
Adjusted EBITDA   6,352   8,883   (2,531 ) (28 )% 41,424   27,226   14,198   52 %
Adjusted EBITDA margin   14 % 26 %     30 % 27 %    

Advertisement 18

Story continues below

Article content

nm: not meaningful

   
1         Prior year figures are derived from restated financial statements. Refer to the Q2 2024 interim financial statements Note 3d – Basis of Presentation and Material Accounting Policy Information Restatement.
2         Sales tax recovery relating to energy and infrastructure and general and administrative expenses have been allocated to their respective periods; refer to the Q3 2024 interim financial statements Note 23b – Additional Details to the Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Profit or Loss (Canadian sales tax refund).
   
 
Bitfarms Ltd. Calculation of Gross Mining Profit and Gross Mining Margin
 
    Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
(U.S.$ in thousands except where indicated)   2024   2023   $ Change   % Change   2024   2023   $ Change   % Change  
Gross loss   (11,789 ) (8,866 ) (2,923 ) 33 % (33,746 ) (23,259 ) (10,487 ) 45 %
Non-Mining revenues¹   (1,451 ) (1,697 ) 246   (14 )% (3,510 ) (3,775 ) 265   (7 )%
Depreciation and amortization   28,829   21,767   7,062   32 % 125,143   62,995   62,148   99 %
Sales tax recovery – depreciation and amortization         % (8,760 )   (8,760 ) (100 )%
Electrical components and salaries   1,097   1,299   (202 ) (16 )% 2,678   3,050   (372 ) (12 )%
Sales tax recovery – prior years – energy and infrastructure²     2,138   (2,138 ) 100 % (14,338 ) 6,155   (20,493 ) (333 )%
Other   13   (114 ) 127   nm   1,222   (343 ) 1,565   nm  
Gross Mining profit   16,699   14,527   2,172   15 % 68,689   44,823   23,866   53 %
Gross Mining margin   38 % 44 %     52 % 47 %    

Advertisement 19

Story continues below

Article content

nm: not meaningful

(1) Non-Mining revenues reconciliation:
    Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
(U.S.$ in thousands except where indicated)   2024   2023   $ Change   % Change   2024   2023   $ Change   % Change  
Revenues   44,853   34,596   10,257   30 % 136,718   100,125   36,593   37 %
Less Mining related revenues for the purpose of calculating gross Mining margin:                          
Mining revenues³   (43,402 ) (32,899 ) (10,503 ) 32 % (133,208 ) (96,350 ) (36,858 ) 38 %
Non-Mining revenues   1,451   1,697   (246 ) (14 )% 3,510   3,775   (265 ) (7 )%
(2) Sales tax recovery relating to energy and infrastructure expenses has been allocated to their respective periods; refer to Q3 2024 interim financial statements Note 23b – Additional Details to the Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Profit or Loss (Canadian sales tax refund).
(3) Mining revenues include Revenues from sale of computational power used for hashing calculations and Revenue from computational power sold in exchange of services.
   
Bitfarms Ltd. Calculation of Direct Cost and Direct Cost per BTC
 
    Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
(U.S.$ in thousands except where indicated)   2024   2023   $ Change   % Change   2024   2023   $ Change   % Change  
Cost of revenues   56,642   43,462   13,180   30 % 170,464   123,384   47,080   38 %
Depreciation and amortization   (28,829 ) (21,767 ) (7,062 ) 32 % (125,143 ) (62,995 ) (62,148 ) 99 %
Sales tax recovery – depreciation and amortization         % 8,760     8,760   100 %
Electrical components and salaries   (1,097 ) (1,299 ) 202   (16 )% (2,678 ) (3,050 ) 372   (12 )%
Infrastructure   (1,432 ) (600 ) (832 ) 139 % (4,328 ) (2,303 ) (2,025 ) 88 %
Sales tax recovery – prior years – energy and infrastructure (1)     (2,138 ) 2,138   (100 )% 14,338   (6,155 ) 20,493   (333 )%
Other         %   82   (82 ) (100 )%
Direct Cost   25,284   17,658   7,626   43 % 61,413   48,963   12,450   25 %
Quantity of BTC earned   703   1,172   (469 ) (40 )% 2,260   3,692   (1,432 ) (39 )%
Direct Cost per BTC (in U.S. dollars)   36,000   15,100   20,900   138 % 27,200   13,300   13,900   105 %

Advertisement 20

Story continues below

Article content

nm: not meaningful

 
Bitfarms Ltd. Calculation of Total Cash Cost and Total Cost per BTC
 
    Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
(U.S.$ in thousands except where indicated)   2024   2023   $ Change   % Change   2024   2023   $ Change   % Change  
Cost of revenues   56,642   43,462   13,180   30 % 170,464   123,384   47,080   38 %
General and administrative expenses   27,600   8,372   19,228   230 % 53,198   25,887   27,311   106 %
    84,242   51,834   32,408   63 % 223,662   149,271   74,391   50 %
Depreciation and amortization   (28,829 ) (21,767 ) (7,062 ) 32 % (125,143 ) (62,995 ) (62,148 ) 99 %
Non-cash service expense (2)   (564 )   (564 ) 100 % (564 )   (564 ) 100 %
Sales tax recovery – depreciation and amortization         % 8,760     8,760   100 %
Electrical components and salaries   (1,097 ) (1,299 ) 202   (16 )% (2,678 ) (3,050 ) 372   (12 )%
Share-based payment   (5,159 ) (2,011 ) (3,148 ) 157 % (9,928 ) (7,009 ) (2,919 ) 42 %
Service fees not associated with ongoing operations   (9,253 )   (9,253 ) 100 % (12,479 )   (12,479 ) 100 %
Sales tax recovery – prior years – energy and infrastructure and general and administrative expenses (1)     (2,366 ) 2,366   100 % 16,081   (6,796 ) 22,877   nm  
Other   (2,500 ) 23   (2,523 ) nm   (5,659 ) 510   (6,169 ) nm  
Total Cash Cost   36,840   24,414   12,426   51 % 92,052   69,931   22,121   32 %
Quantity of BTC earned   703   1,172   (469 ) (40 )% 2,260   3,692   (1,432 ) (39 )%
Total Cash Cost per BTC (in U.S. dollars)   52,400   20,800   31,600   152 % 40,700   18,900   21,800   115 %

nm: not meaningful

   
1         Sales tax recovery relating to energy and infrastructure and general and administrative expenses have been allocated to their respective periods; refer to Q3 2024 interim financial statements Note 23b – Additional Details to the Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Profit or Loss (Canadian sales tax refund).
2         Non-cash service expense, included in infrastructure, which was exchanged for computational power sold.


Article content

Comments

Join the Conversation

Featured Local Savings

Six Canadian Cities for Americans Escaping a Trump Presidency



With Donald Trump entering the White House in January, some Americans may consider a fresh start in a stable, welcoming, and progressive country like Canada.

Known for its high quality of life, universal healthcare, and multicultural environment, Canada has long been a preferred destination for those seeking a secure and peaceful lifestyle.

Here, we explore six Canadian cities that offer a variety of lifestyle options for Americans who may be contemplating relocation.

Each city has its unique character, opportunities, and amenities, providing a new beginning that feels like home.

Toronto

1. Toronto, Ontario

Overview:
Toronto, Canada’s largest city, offers a dynamic, metropolitan lifestyle reminiscent of New York or Chicago. It’s an economic powerhouse with a rich cultural scene and unparalleled diversity, making it a natural choice for Americans looking for job opportunities and cultural vibrancy.

Why It Appeals to Americans:

  • Job Opportunities: Toronto’s job market is robust, particularly in finance, tech, healthcare, and media. The city is also home to the Toronto Stock Exchange and many multinational companies.
  • Diversity and Community: Known as one of the most multicultural cities worldwide, Toronto is welcoming to people from all walks of life.
  • Urban Amenities and Quality of Life: Ranked as one of the safest and most livable cities, Toronto offers excellent healthcare, education, and entertainment.

Considerations:
Toronto’s cost of living, especially housing, is among the highest in Canada. Those relocating for job opportunities may find it easier to manage expenses, but careful budgeting is essential.


Vancouver

2. Vancouver, British Columbia

Overview:
Nestled between mountains and the Pacific Ocean, Vancouver is famous for its stunning natural beauty, mild climate, and thriving industries in tech, film, and environmental sciences. It’s ideal for those who want access to outdoor adventures without sacrificing urban amenities.

Why It Appeals to Americans:

  • Natural Beauty and Climate: Vancouver’s landscape includes beaches, mountains, and forests, making it a haven for outdoor enthusiasts. Its mild winters and cool summers are also attractive for those avoiding harsher climates.
  • Booming Tech and Media Sectors: Often called “Hollywood North,” Vancouver attracts many professionals in film, tech, and media, making it especially appealing for Americans from the West Coast.
  • Sustainability and Progressiveness: Vancouver’s eco-friendly policies and community focus make it a great fit for those who prioritize environmental consciousness.

Considerations:
Vancouver’s cost of living, especially in housing, is high, so it’s ideal for those with established careers or remote work flexibility.


Montreal

3. Montreal, Quebec

Overview:
Montreal combines the charm of Europe with North American comforts, creating a vibrant, bilingual atmosphere with affordable living and a thriving cultural scene. Known for its arts, festivals, and unique history, Montreal is a great choice for those who appreciate a mix of tradition and modernity.

Why It Appeals to Americans:

  • Affordable Living: Compared to Toronto and Vancouver, Montreal offers lower housing costs, making it a great option for families or those on a budget.
  • Cultural Richness: Montreal is known for its world-class festivals, art galleries, and music scene, attracting creative and artistic individuals.
  • Bilingual Lifestyle: While French is the primary language, English is widely spoken, making it accessible yet giving newcomers a chance to embrace bilingualism.

Considerations:
Learning some French is beneficial in Montreal, especially for social integration and work, as the city embraces its Francophone roots.


Calgary

4. Calgary, Alberta

Overview:
Calgary provides a balance of urban energy and outdoor adventure, with a strong economy and proximity to the stunning Rocky Mountains. Known for its friendly residents and practical living costs, Calgary is ideal for those seeking career opportunities and easy access to nature.

Why It Appeals to Americans:

  • Affordable Housing and Lower Taxes: Calgary offers affordable housing compared to other major Canadian cities and has no provincial sales tax, making it attractive for families.
  • Booming Job Market: Calgary’s job market is strong, particularly in the oil, gas, and renewable energy sectors, though tech is also on the rise.
  • Outdoor Lifestyle: With the Rockies just an hour away, Calgary is perfect for those who enjoy skiing, hiking, and other outdoor activities.

Considerations:
Calgary has long winters with significant snowfall, so newcomers should be prepared for colder temperatures during winter months.


Ottawa

5. Ottawa, Ontario

Overview:
Canada’s capital, Ottawa, is known for its political significance, high quality of life, and beautiful architecture. It’s a city that combines urban sophistication with a community feel, making it ideal for professionals, families, and retirees alike.

Why It Appeals to Americans:

  • Stable Job Market: Ottawa has a strong job market, especially in government, tech, and education, and is home to Canada’s largest high-tech park.
  • Quality of Life: Known for its clean environment, safe neighborhoods, and extensive green spaces, Ottawa consistently ranks high in quality of life.
  • Bilingual and Multicultural: While English is widely spoken, Ottawa’s bilingual nature adds a cultural dimension that may be appealing to Americans interested in embracing new experiences.

Considerations:
Winters in Ottawa can be long and cold, though the city has plenty of winter activities, such as skating on the Rideau Canal, to make the season enjoyable.


Halifax

6. Halifax, Nova Scotia

Overview:
Halifax offers a slower pace of life, with strong community ties, proximity to the Atlantic Ocean, and affordable living costs. It’s perfect for those seeking a more relaxed lifestyle in a friendly environment with rich maritime history.

Why It Appeals to Americans:

  • Affordable Living: Halifax’s cost of living is more manageable than in larger cities, making it attractive for remote workers, retirees, or those looking to downsize.
  • Growing Job Market: Halifax’s economy is growing, especially in ocean tech, healthcare, and education. Its accessible job market makes it a viable option for many professionals.
  • Community and Nature: Halifax’s strong community feel and access to coastal beauty make it an ideal place for Americans seeking a close-knit, friendly city near the sea.

Considerations:
Halifax may not have the same job diversity as larger Canadian cities, so it’s best suited for remote workers, retirees, or those with job offers.


Each of these Canadian cities offers a unique mix of opportunities, culture, and lifestyle that may appeal to Americans considering relocation. Whether you’re drawn to the metropolitan buzz of Toronto, the outdoor beauty of Vancouver, the European flair of Montreal, the balanced lifestyle of Calgary, the political and cultural richness of Ottawa, or the coastal charm of Halifax, Canada offers diverse and welcoming cities that align with a wide range of priorities and lifestyles.

FAQ: Moving to Canada from the U.S.

What are the benefits of moving to Canada from the U.S.?

Moving to Canada offers Americans stability, universal healthcare, and a welcoming, multicultural society. Canada’s high quality of life, progressive policies, and economic opportunities make it appealing for those seeking a fresh start. Each city presents unique options, from Toronto’s career prospects to Halifax’s affordable, relaxed lifestyle. Whether it’s for work, family, or community, Canada’s inclusive environment supports newcomers in finding a secure and fulfilling home.

Which Canadian cities are most popular among American expats?

Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, Calgary, Ottawa, and Halifax are top choices for American expats due to their unique amenities and communities. Toronto and Vancouver offer thriving job markets and cultural vibrancy, while Ottawa and Halifax provide quieter lifestyles with affordable living costs. Each city has its distinct benefits, ensuring expats can find a place that matches their lifestyle, from dynamic urban centers to more relaxed, community-focused areas.

Is the cost of living high in major Canadian cities?

While cities like Toronto and Vancouver have higher living costs, especially for housing, other cities such as Montreal, Calgary, and Halifax are more affordable options. Factors like job market conditions, housing availability, and general living expenses vary across cities. Many American expats find that careful budgeting and choosing the right city can help manage costs, allowing them to enjoy Canada’s quality of life without financial strain.

Do I need to speak French to live in Canada?

English is widely spoken throughout Canada, especially in provinces like Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia. In Quebec, particularly in Montreal, knowing French is beneficial but not mandatory for English-speaking expats. In Ottawa, Canada’s bilingual capital, both English and French are commonly used. While French can enhance social and work opportunities in some areas, English speakers are generally comfortable across the country.

What immigration pathways are available for Americans moving to Canada?

Canada offers multiple immigration options, including Express Entry for skilled workers, the Start-Up Visa for entrepreneurs, and the Provincial Nominee Program. Each pathway has specific eligibility criteria, with Express Entry being the most popular for qualified professionals. Americans looking to relocate permanently can explore these programs, each tailored to meet different backgrounds and goals, making it easier for skilled individuals and families to settle in Canada.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2019. TSX Stocks
All Rights Reserved